No, actually, UA is based on the premise that the entire Earth is accelerating toward *you*. Equivalence principle and all that.

Please explain more of this new relativity you've formed with a preferred frame.

Can you explain what you think the correct formula for velocity is? We can move on to frames of reference after this if you still want.

I thought we were talking about relativistic speeds. Can you explain why you believe that is the correct formula?

Right, because of the "relativistic velocity" or something....

No, we haven't even gotten into relativistic effects yet. Since velocity v = at, after one day, the slower-accelerating equatorial regions are traveling

v_{equator} = 9.7755 m/sec^{2} * 86400 sec

= 844,603.2 m/sec

= 844.6 km/sec

This is still well below relativistic velocity (the speed of light is about 300,000 km/sec). After a few weeks, however...

You are not using the correct formula for velocity

I haven't seen *your* "correct" formula for velocity yet.

That doesn't surprise me. Nor does it surprise me that you still manage to feel it appropriate to "educate" me.

What doesn't surprise you?

I'm still waiting for your "correct" formula for velocity. Can you provide it, please?

*You* were the one who said my formula was wrong. Remember?

Is 844.6 km/sec (less than 0.3% the speed of light) relativistic?

I'm the one waiting to be educated.