Really?

  • 191 Replies
  • 24286 Views
?

inquisitive

  • 5108
  • +0/-0
Re: Really?
« Reply #150 on: August 18, 2014, 01:50:58 PM »
Evidence that something is not real?
How about you provide some evidence of how you believe GPS works.

?

Macpie

  • 245
  • +0/-0
Re: Really?
« Reply #151 on: August 18, 2014, 01:51:11 PM »
Evidence that something is not real?
No, for f*cks sake. That your FE is real. How can it be so hard to read a few sentences where this is clearly worded and understand it properly? What evidence exists for FE? Not some stuff "disproving" RE, no "workarounds" for stuff which works on RE but wouldn't on a "simple" FE. Just plain old evidence supporting FE.

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Really?
« Reply #152 on: August 18, 2014, 01:52:43 PM »
I will give you some examples.  Please prove that Big Foot does not exist.  Please prove that the Lochness Monster does not exist.  Please prove the moon is not made of cheese.  Do you see what proving a negative means now? 

?

General Patton

  • 245
  • +0/-0
  • Undefeated round earther
Re: Really?
« Reply #153 on: August 18, 2014, 01:55:24 PM »
I will give you some examples.  Please prove that Big Foot does not exist.  Please prove that the Lochness Monster does not exist.  Please prove the moon is not made of cheese.  Do you see what proving a negative means now?
FFS, this isn't about bigfoot, this isn't about the lochness monster, this isn't about the moon being made of cheese.
Your hypocriteness level is very high right now.
You aren't proving sh*t to us by this BS
It is so fun educating FE'rs who don't know anything.

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Really?
« Reply #154 on: August 18, 2014, 01:59:27 PM »
You asked me to prove a negative, and I gave you examples to show how that is not possible.  Maybe you could try to prove your positive? 

?

inquisitive

  • 5108
  • +0/-0
Re: Really?
« Reply #155 on: August 18, 2014, 02:01:42 PM »
You asked me to prove a negative, and I gave you examples to show how that is not possible.  Maybe you could try to prove your positive?
Prove your view of how GPS works.

?

Macpie

  • 245
  • +0/-0
Re: Really?
« Reply #156 on: August 18, 2014, 02:02:41 PM »
You asked me to prove a negative, and I gave you examples to show how that is not possible.  Maybe you could try to prove your positive?
Where did you find us asking you to "prove a negative"?
And inquisitive, let him answer a single question at a time.

?

General Patton

  • 245
  • +0/-0
  • Undefeated round earther
Re: Really?
« Reply #157 on: August 18, 2014, 02:04:24 PM »
You asked me to prove a negative, and I gave you examples to show how that is not possible.  Maybe you could try to prove your positive?
So I guess you can't prove why you think the Earth is flat, huh?
Very interesting.
It is so fun educating FE'rs who don't know anything.

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Really?
« Reply #158 on: August 18, 2014, 02:07:20 PM »
So, I guess you can't prove the Earth is round, then?

?

General Patton

  • 245
  • +0/-0
  • Undefeated round earther
Re: Really?
« Reply #159 on: August 18, 2014, 02:08:39 PM »
So, I guess you can't prove the Earth is round, then?
That is what we have been doing. Did you see the picture i posted earlier?
It is so fun educating FE'rs who don't know anything.

?

General Patton

  • 245
  • +0/-0
  • Undefeated round earther
Re: Really?
« Reply #160 on: August 18, 2014, 02:11:18 PM »
So, I guess you can't prove the Earth is round, then?
 



Looks round to me, what about you?
This is from NASA.
This isn't fake













It is so fun educating FE'rs who don't know anything.

?

inquisitive

  • 5108
  • +0/-0
Re: Really?
« Reply #161 on: August 18, 2014, 02:14:19 PM »
So, I guess you can't prove the Earth is round, then?
Distances, travel times, pictures, satellites, observations of sun and moon.

FE proof?

?

General Patton

  • 245
  • +0/-0
  • Undefeated round earther
Re: Really?
« Reply #162 on: August 18, 2014, 02:18:35 PM »
So, I guess you can't prove the Earth is round, then?
Distances, travel times, pictures, satellites, observations of sun and moon.

FE proof?
I think he is too scared to reply, or wants to find a way to prove the pic is fake
LOL
It is so fun educating FE'rs who don't know anything.

?

General Patton

  • 245
  • +0/-0
  • Undefeated round earther
Re: Really?
« Reply #163 on: August 18, 2014, 03:57:50 PM »
And you have not provided evidence yet that Tatooine is real or not real.
Looks like someone is thinking of a way to prove that the picture is fake.
LOL
It is so fun educating FE'rs who don't know anything.

?

robintex

  • Ranters
  • 5322
  • +0/-0
Re: Really?
« Reply #164 on: August 18, 2014, 04:06:49 PM »
Hey Macpie and General Patton. Don't get frustrated. If you have been on this website very long you will get used to jroa's behavior when he - or any other FE - is backed into a corner. It's one of the attractions for "Round Earthers" to see what kind of nonsense the "Flat Earthers" are going to come up with next, so don't expect any results if you ask them simple questions.
Stick close , very close , to your P.C.and never go to sea
And you all may be Rulers of The Flat Earth Society

Look out your window , see what you shall see
And you all may be Rulers of The Flat Earth Society

Chorus:
Yes ! Never, never, never,  ever go to sea !

?

robintex

  • Ranters
  • 5322
  • +0/-0
Re: Really?
« Reply #165 on: August 18, 2014, 04:09:13 PM »
Yes, really.  And, yes we are serious.  Also, pictures are easily faked and so are videos.

This website is a lot of fun if you don't take anthing from an FE seriously. LOL  !.

They are not really serious. They are just actors playing as if they were serious.
Stick close , very close , to your P.C.and never go to sea
And you all may be Rulers of The Flat Earth Society

Look out your window , see what you shall see
And you all may be Rulers of The Flat Earth Society

Chorus:
Yes ! Never, never, never,  ever go to sea !

?

General Patton

  • 245
  • +0/-0
  • Undefeated round earther
Re: Really?
« Reply #166 on: August 18, 2014, 04:13:54 PM »
Yes, really.  And, yes we are serious.  Also, pictures are easily faked and so are videos.

This website is a lot of fun if you don't take anthing from an FE seriously. LOL  !.

They are not really serious. They are just actors playing as if they were serious.
Are you a round earther?
It is so fun educating FE'rs who don't know anything.

?

robintex

  • Ranters
  • 5322
  • +0/-0
Re: Really?
« Reply #167 on: August 18, 2014, 05:25:39 PM »
Yes, really.  And, yes we are serious.  Also, pictures are easily faked and so are videos.

This website is a lot of fun if you don't take anthing from an FE seriously. LOL  !.

They are not really serious. They are just actors playing as if they were serious.
Are you a round earther?

Yes. See my signature . This is just the opinion of many "Round Earthers". There may be some that really believe in a flat earth, but it does seem incredible.
Stick close , very close , to your P.C.and never go to sea
And you all may be Rulers of The Flat Earth Society

Look out your window , see what you shall see
And you all may be Rulers of The Flat Earth Society

Chorus:
Yes ! Never, never, never,  ever go to sea !

?

General Patton

  • 245
  • +0/-0
  • Undefeated round earther
Re: Really?
« Reply #168 on: August 18, 2014, 05:36:46 PM »
Yes, really.  And, yes we are serious.  Also, pictures are easily faked and so are videos.

This website is a lot of fun if you don't take anthing from an FE seriously. LOL  !.

They are not really serious. They are just actors playing as if they were serious.
Are you a round earther?

Yes. See my signature . This is just the opinion of many "Round Earthers". There may be some that really believe in a flat earth, but it does seem incredible.
Ok
It is so fun educating FE'rs who don't know anything.

?

robintex

  • Ranters
  • 5322
  • +0/-0
Re: Really?
« Reply #169 on: August 18, 2014, 05:56:48 PM »
One of jroa's favorite tactics is to de-rail a topic with a lot of off-topic posts such as  "Tatooine" which of course is not real, but fictional and part of the "Star Wars" movies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatooine
Stick close , very close , to your P.C.and never go to sea
And you all may be Rulers of The Flat Earth Society

Look out your window , see what you shall see
And you all may be Rulers of The Flat Earth Society

Chorus:
Yes ! Never, never, never,  ever go to sea !

?

General Patton

  • 245
  • +0/-0
  • Undefeated round earther
Re: Really?
« Reply #170 on: August 18, 2014, 06:01:47 PM »
One of jroa's favorite tactics is to de-rail a topic with a lot of off-topic posts such as  "Tatooine" which of course is not real, but fictional and part of the "Star Wars" movies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatooine
Yeah.
It is funny how he thinks that some fictional planet from a Star Wars movie can have to do with the Earth being flat......
It is so fun educating FE'rs who don't know anything.

?

robintex

  • Ranters
  • 5322
  • +0/-0
Re: Really?
« Reply #171 on: August 18, 2014, 06:05:27 PM »
One of jroa's favorite tactics is to de-rail a topic with a lot of off-topic posts such as  "Tatooine" which of course is not real, but fictional and part of the "Star Wars" movies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatooine
Yeah.
It is funny how he thinks that some fictional planet from a Star Wars movie can have to do with the Earth being flat......

Welcome to  the club.........

There is another website which has book reviews. One of the reviewers of a book that was particularly bad called it "It's so stupid it's funny." I sometimes think that also applies to this website......
« Last Edit: August 18, 2014, 06:10:43 PM by Googleotomy »
Stick close , very close , to your P.C.and never go to sea
And you all may be Rulers of The Flat Earth Society

Look out your window , see what you shall see
And you all may be Rulers of The Flat Earth Society

Chorus:
Yes ! Never, never, never,  ever go to sea !

?

General Patton

  • 245
  • +0/-0
  • Undefeated round earther
Re: Really?
« Reply #172 on: August 18, 2014, 06:10:48 PM »
One of jroa's favorite tactics is to de-rail a topic with a lot of off-topic posts such as  "Tatooine" which of course is not real, but fictional and part of the "Star Wars" movies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatooine
Yeah.
It is funny how he thinks that some fictional planet from a Star Wars movie can have to do with the Earth being flat......

Welcome to  the club.........
Yep!
It is so fun educating FE'rs who don't know anything.

?

robintex

  • Ranters
  • 5322
  • +0/-0
Re: Really?
« Reply #173 on: August 18, 2014, 08:30:06 PM »
Stratollites can perform the same function that a satellite is claimed to do.
They do not exist and existing GPS is based on satellites as you know.
Sorry guys, I was at work.
I have seen that we have gave jroa so much correct information, that it is about time that he gives us some evidence on why the Earth is flat.
Give us some, jroa

You claim that the Earth is round, and I say it is not.  Then, you demand evidence and demand that I prove a negative?  Hey, Tatooine is real.  Here is a picture.  Now, prove it is not real.  ::)



Verrrry funny . I should think that this  should provide sufficient evidence that it's not real. LOL
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatooine
Stick close , very close , to your P.C.and never go to sea
And you all may be Rulers of The Flat Earth Society

Look out your window , see what you shall see
And you all may be Rulers of The Flat Earth Society

Chorus:
Yes ! Never, never, never,  ever go to sea !

*

th3rm0m3t3r0

  • At least 3 words, please.
  • 4696
  • +0/-0
  • It's SCIENCE!
Re: Really?
« Reply #174 on: August 18, 2014, 11:02:25 PM »
So, I guess you can't prove the Earth is round, then?
 



Looks round to me, what about you?
This is from NASA.
This isn't fake
What have you done to prove that this picture hasn't been doctored?
Or did you just take NASA's word for it?
Those pictures always somehow look fake to me.
That's just my first instinct.


I don't profess to be correct.
Quote from: sceptimatic
I am correct.

?

guv

  • 1132
  • +0/-0
Re: Really?
« Reply #175 on: August 18, 2014, 11:09:35 PM »
The flat mob should get into politics they got the bullshit part worked out pretty good. Mr Rowbotham wrote in his book that you should not trust theories and then spends 400 odd pages expounding his own theories with no proof. The chapter about the Earths motion is real funny. His understanding of ballistics is non existent. Sounds like something you will see a lot of around here. No facts no answers and a whole heap of mass debate. You are debating the shape of a large amount of mass after all.

*

th3rm0m3t3r0

  • At least 3 words, please.
  • 4696
  • +0/-0
  • It's SCIENCE!
Re: Really?
« Reply #176 on: August 18, 2014, 11:18:42 PM »
Well, how about one of you tell me why the image in question looks like this when I use one of those nifty error level analyzers?



I don't profess to be correct.
Quote from: sceptimatic
I am correct.

?

Macpie

  • 245
  • +0/-0
Re: Really?
« Reply #177 on: August 19, 2014, 12:00:56 AM »
Well, how about one of you tell me why the image in question looks like this when I use one of those nifty error level analyzers?


I do not know which program have you used, but my first guess would be that it interprets these irregular bright spots on a much darker background as artifacts or wear of a scanned photo. What does this program actually do?

*

th3rm0m3t3r0

  • At least 3 words, please.
  • 4696
  • +0/-0
  • It's SCIENCE!
Re: Really?
« Reply #178 on: August 19, 2014, 12:18:14 AM »
Macpie -
http://29a.ch/2012/4/15/image-error-level-analysis-with-html5
Quote
Image error level analysis is a technique that can help to identify manipulations to compressed (JPEG) images by detecting the distribution of error introduced after resaving the image at a specific compression rate. I stumbled across this technique in this presentation by Neal Krawetz and decided to do a quick implementation in JavaScript.

Google "image error level analyzer", there are plenty.


I don't profess to be correct.
Quote from: sceptimatic
I am correct.

?

QuQu

  • 231
  • +0/-0
Re: Really?
« Reply #179 on: August 19, 2014, 12:33:46 AM »
Macpie -
http://29a.ch/2012/4/15/image-error-level-analysis-with-html5
Quote
Image error level analysis is a technique that can help to identify manipulations to compressed (JPEG) images by detecting the distribution of error introduced after resaving the image at a specific compression rate. I stumbled across this technique in this presentation by Neal Krawetz and decided to do a quick implementation in JavaScript.

Google "image error level analyzer", there are plenty.

Get a picture of yourself and analyze it using these. You will see that it is fake.