If the earth is round.

I feel like I've repeated myself enough in this thread.

Agreed.  You have repeatedly failed to produce a photo that supports your claim.

Quote from: flatulence on August 03, 2014, 08:45:10 PM

I feel like I've repeated myself enough in this thread.

Agreed.  You have repeatedly failed to produce a photo that supports your claim.

I've provided several.

Quote from: markjo on August 04, 2014, 05:24:58 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 03, 2014, 08:45:10 PM

I feel like I've repeated myself enough in this thread.

Agreed.  You have repeatedly failed to produce a photo that supports your claim.

I've provided several.

Yes, but none of them supported your claim.

Quote from: flatulence on August 04, 2014, 05:35:41 AM

Quote from: markjo on August 04, 2014, 05:24:58 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 03, 2014, 08:45:10 PM

I feel like I've repeated myself enough in this thread.

Agreed.  You have repeatedly failed to produce a photo that supports your claim.

I've provided several.

Yes, but none of them supported your claim.

Your biased worldview is not allowing you to see the truth.

Quote from: markjo on August 04, 2014, 06:06:51 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 04, 2014, 05:35:41 AM

Quote from: markjo on August 04, 2014, 05:24:58 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 03, 2014, 08:45:10 PM

I feel like I've repeated myself enough in this thread.

Agreed.  You have repeatedly failed to produce a photo that supports your claim.

I've provided several.

Yes, but none of them supported your claim.

Your biased worldview is not allowing you to see the truth.

Not really. He just has eyes, like the rest of us.

Quote from: flatulence on August 04, 2014, 06:35:44 AM

Quote from: markjo on August 04, 2014, 06:06:51 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 04, 2014, 05:35:41 AM

Quote from: markjo on August 04, 2014, 05:24:58 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 03, 2014, 08:45:10 PM

I feel like I've repeated myself enough in this thread.

Agreed.  You have repeatedly failed to produce a photo that supports your claim.

I've provided several.

Yes, but none of them supported your claim.

Your biased worldview is not allowing you to see the truth.

Not really. He just has eyes, like the rest of us.

It is funny that you mention eyes considering that that is the first thing that should tell you where you've erred.

Quote from: markjo on August 04, 2014, 06:06:51 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 04, 2014, 05:35:41 AM

Quote from: markjo on August 04, 2014, 05:24:58 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 03, 2014, 08:45:10 PM

I feel like I've repeated myself enough in this thread.

Agreed.  You have repeatedly failed to produce a photo that supports your claim.

I've provided several.

Yes, but none of them supported your claim.

Your biased worldview is not allowing you to see the truth.

No, your inability to produce evidence to support your claim is not allowing me to see the truth.

Quote from: Socratic Amusement on August 04, 2014, 07:04:03 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 04, 2014, 06:35:44 AM

Quote from: markjo on August 04, 2014, 06:06:51 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 04, 2014, 05:35:41 AM

Quote from: markjo on August 04, 2014, 05:24:58 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 03, 2014, 08:45:10 PM

I feel like I've repeated myself enough in this thread.

Agreed.  You have repeatedly failed to produce a photo that supports your claim.

I've provided several.

Yes, but none of them supported your claim.

Your biased worldview is not allowing you to see the truth.

Not really. He just has eyes, like the rest of us.

It is funny that you mention eyes considering that that is the first thing that should tell you where you've erred.

Exactly. But since you've produced nothing to show where we have erred in photographs of the past, I'd say that your assertion that a biased worldview is the culprit is baseless.

The only pictures you provided were on of a nebula and one of the earth made out of other inmates. Feel free to actually try and prove a point by posting proper pictures and then showing how they are fake.

As for bias. The only bias in this thread is from you and it showed up in the OP. 

I suggest you go back to lurking. Then maybe in a month you can try again.

Quote from: flatulence on August 04, 2014, 07:20:32 AM

Quote from: Socratic Amusement on August 04, 2014, 07:04:03 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 04, 2014, 06:35:44 AM

Quote from: markjo on August 04, 2014, 06:06:51 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 04, 2014, 05:35:41 AM

Quote from: markjo on August 04, 2014, 05:24:58 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 03, 2014, 08:45:10 PM

I feel like I've repeated myself enough in this thread.

Agreed.  You have repeatedly failed to produce a photo that supports your claim.

I've provided several.

Yes, but none of them supported your claim.

Your biased worldview is not allowing you to see the truth.

Not really. He just has eyes, like the rest of us.

It is funny that you mention eyes considering that that is the first thing that should tell you where you've erred.

Exactly. But since you've produced nothing to show where we have erred in photographs of the past, I'd say that your assertion that a biased worldview is the culprit is baseless.

Because a picture is worth more than seeing its flatitude with your own eyes

Quote from: Socratic Amusement on August 04, 2014, 08:58:28 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 04, 2014, 07:20:32 AM

Quote from: Socratic Amusement on August 04, 2014, 07:04:03 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 04, 2014, 06:35:44 AM

Quote from: markjo on August 04, 2014, 06:06:51 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 04, 2014, 05:35:41 AM

Quote from: markjo on August 04, 2014, 05:24:58 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 03, 2014, 08:45:10 PM

I feel like I've repeated myself enough in this thread.

Agreed.  You have repeatedly failed to produce a photo that supports your claim.

I've provided several.

Yes, but none of them supported your claim.

Your biased worldview is not allowing you to see the truth.

Not really. He just has eyes, like the rest of us.

It is funny that you mention eyes considering that that is the first thing that should tell you where you've erred.

Exactly. But since you've produced nothing to show where we have erred in photographs of the past, I'd say that your assertion that a biased worldview is the culprit is baseless.

Because a picture is worth more than seeing its flatitude with your own eyes

First of all, you're the one who brought up pictures and have yet to provide one that supports your claim.

Secondly, I live in a river valley with hills all around me.  The only flatitude that I see was flattened by a bulldozer.

Quote from: Socratic Amusement on August 04, 2014, 08:58:28 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 04, 2014, 07:20:32 AM

Quote from: Socratic Amusement on August 04, 2014, 07:04:03 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 04, 2014, 06:35:44 AM

Quote from: markjo on August 04, 2014, 06:06:51 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 04, 2014, 05:35:41 AM

Quote from: markjo on August 04, 2014, 05:24:58 AM

Quote from: flatulence on August 03, 2014, 08:45:10 PM

I feel like I've repeated myself enough in this thread.

Agreed.  You have repeatedly failed to produce a photo that supports your claim.

I've provided several.

Yes, but none of them supported your claim.

Your biased worldview is not allowing you to see the truth.

Not really. He just has eyes, like the rest of us.

It is funny that you mention eyes considering that that is the first thing that should tell you where you've erred.

Exactly. But since you've produced nothing to show where we have erred in photographs of the past, I'd say that your assertion that a biased worldview is the culprit is baseless.

Because a picture is worth more than seeing its flatitude with your own eyes

The world doesn't look flat.

I live an hour from the ocean, and every time I go there, I am jaw dropped about how flat the Earth looks. 

I live an hour from the ocean, and every time I go there, I am jaw dropped about how flat the Earth looks.

Are you really arguing that the earth must be flat because your eyes can't discern any curvature when you stand on the shore?  If not, then why bother mentioning this?

Quote from: jroa on August 04, 2014, 12:36:34 PM

I live an hour from the ocean, and every time I go there, I am jaw dropped about how flat the Earth looks.

Are you really arguing that the earth must be flat because your eyes can't discern any curvature when you stand on the shore?  If not, then why bother mentioning this?

I simply gave an observation.  Are you telling me that I am not entitled to have opinions? 

Quote from: FlatAllTheWay on August 04, 2014, 01:01:46 PM

Quote from: jroa on August 04, 2014, 12:36:34 PM

I live an hour from the ocean, and every time I go there, I am jaw dropped about how flat the Earth looks.

Are you really arguing that the earth must be flat because your eyes can't discern any curvature when you stand on the shore?  If not, then why bother mentioning this?

I simply gave an observation.  Are you telling me that I am not entitled to have opinions?

It looks flat simply because of the size of it, as you know.

I live an hour from the ocean, and every time I go there, I am jaw dropped about how flat the Earth looks.

And I live in the mountains. The world must be a zig-zag shape. 

If you have access to Autocad or something like that, an interesting thing to do is make a drawing to scale of a stick man and a round Earth, then zoom out from the man and see just how far out you need to get to see even one pixel's worth of curvature.

Quote from: Pythagoras on August 03, 2014, 10:49:43 AM

By the way have you had time to present us with your model yet?

It is still in development. Please be patient.

Okay... it's now two days down the track.  Can I ask you how your flat earth model is progressing?

Can you also tell me what sort of data sources you're utilising in order to construct this model?  As far as I can tell from having researched this issue, there are no accredited scientific resources to draw upon—other than in constructing a spherical earth model.

Is your model a product of your own intuition, rationale, and logical processes—having considered the actual evidence surrounding us, and visible to all?  Or is it purely hypothetical, and posited as a possibility only?  Finally, have you drawn upon any other flat earth models for guidance, or is your model unique?

Quote from: flatulence on August 03, 2014, 10:55:54 AM

Quote from: Pythagoras on August 03, 2014, 10:49:43 AM

By the way have you had time to present us with your model yet?

It is still in development. Please be patient.

Okay... it's now two days down the track.  Can I ask you how your flat earth model is progressing?

Can you also tell me what sort of data sources you're utilising in order to construct this model?  As far as I can tell from having researched this issue, there are no accredited scientific resources to draw upon—other than in constructing a spherical earth model.

Is your model a product of your own intuition, rationale, and logical processes—having considered the actual evidence surrounding us, and visible to all?  Or is it purely hypothetical, and posited as a possibility only?  Finally, have you drawn upon any other flat earth models for guidance, or is your model unique?

Did it take Einstein two days to formulate his theory of Special Relativity?  Can't you have a little patience? 

Quote from: ausGeoff on August 04, 2014, 09:52:03 PM

Quote from: flatulence on August 03, 2014, 10:55:54 AM

Quote from: Pythagoras on August 03, 2014, 10:49:43 AM

By the way have you had time to present us with your model yet?

It is still in development. Please be patient.

Okay... it's now two days down the track.  Can I ask you how your flat earth model is progressing?

Can you also tell me what sort of data sources you're utilising in order to construct this model?  As far as I can tell from having researched this issue, there are no accredited scientific resources to draw upon—other than in constructing a spherical earth model.

Is your model a product of your own intuition, rationale, and logical processes—having considered the actual evidence surrounding us, and visible to all?  Or is it purely hypothetical, and posited as a possibility only?  Finally, have you drawn upon any other flat earth models for guidance, or is your model unique?

Did it take Einstein two days to formulate his theory of Special Relativity?  Can't you have a little patience?

Apart from the fact that my questions weren't addressed to you jroa (you just can't resist posting your witless one-liners can you LOL) I wasn't asking flatulence for the entire, finished model.  My questions were directed more at his progress, and what technical resources he was using to develop his model.

Then why does a known fraudulent conspiracy entity like NASA exist? Why do we see so many fake pictures of the world being round? Surely, if the earth was round then the pictures would look real instead of like the blatant fabrications that they are.

You're perfectly right. They are fake. Crystal clear.

The problem is that they can see what you see. Something is covering their eyes. Maybe because of what they used to learn and fed since their childhood.


* Why your photo is very sad with ugly eyes boy?

I am interested to know why you think the first photo in this thread is "fake"?  NASA have access to the worlds finest equipment for astrophotography.   A composite photo does not mean a fake photo.

This website is from a gentleman I met recently who started out his astrophotography as a hobby, and he has now been featured in various magazines etc.  He was telling me that it takes him MONTHS to put one image together - using various pieces of equipment and loooooong 12 hour exposures, the photos are built up in layers.  He has no reason to fake photographs, he is nothing to do with NASA - this is a link to his gallery, including the Horsehead Nebula.  http://www.astrophotography.ie/gallery.htm   And remember, NASA will have equipment 100 times better that his....

I am interested to know why you think the first photo in this thread is "fake"?  NASA have access to the worlds finest equipment for astrophotography.   

It should be noted that flatulence failed to provide one single piece of viable evidence supporting his claim the this infrared image of the Horsehead Nebula taken from the Hubble telescope was faked in any way.



Like too many flat earthers, flatulance makes the simple but unscientifically-supported claim that all NASA photographic images are bogus.  He's unable to offer any explanation as to why he believes this, or how exactly it's been faked—other than his own personal "opinion" that it's so.

I therefore challenge you flatulence to address this issue, and provide empirical evidence that could prove NASA faked this image.  It's time to put your money where your mouth is flatulence, or like your user name suggests, are you just full of hot air?

I thought flatulence was getting rid of warm, smelly methane.

I live an hour from the ocean, and every time I go there, I am jaw dropped about how flat the Earth looks.

Come on now, the round earth "theory" perfectly explains why you're perceiving the world as flat, it's not even a tricky concept to wrap your head round. We live on a pretty huge (and round) planet.

But jroa I have to ask, your little pope/hitler gif thing... are you kinda joking with that or do you actually think that's a decent way of arguing your position?

It seems you are having a really hard time understanding my metaphor. So I suppose I will spoon feed you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eclipse_cycle

I don't quite get it flatulence, you just spoon fed us an animation of a round earth..?

But jroa I have to ask, your little pope/hitler gif thing... are you kinda joking with that or do you actually think that's a decent way of arguing your position?

Satire just flies over your head, does it not?   

Quote from: Murrays mint on August 13, 2014, 08:01:18 AM

But jroa I have to ask, your little pope/hitler gif thing... are you kinda joking with that or do you actually think that's a decent way of arguing your position?

Satire just flies over your head, does it not?

Thankfully not, I'm too tall.
I did actually ask you if you were joking. I assumed as much but I had to check, I mean, you DO believe the earth is flat. Thanks for confirming though.

Quote from: Murrays mint on August 13, 2014, 08:01:18 AM

But jroa I have to ask, your little pope/hitler gif thing... are you kinda joking with that or do you actually think that's a decent way of arguing your position?

Satire just flies over your head, does it not?

Don't worry about it Murrays mint !. LOL ! Once you stop taking anything seriously from any FE you can have a lot of fun on this website. Of course every one knows the website is is one big.....Uh Oh. I am not allowed to say that. jroa is one of the best or worst at it. We all know what this website is all about. Not allowed to say that, too. Might- Quote- "Run someone off this website" -Unquote -, but I think it's the attraction to this website. Cheers ! Most of us come here for the fun of it. See my signature line. Welcome to the club ! "It' so xxxxxx it's xxxxx."