This argument gets used time and time again and it's a silly argument to be honest.
There are many things in life that I accept. I accept them because I can actually go and verify them if I wish.
Oh good, you know you can go and verify rocket launches by actually going to one right?
Having said that, I have no wish to verify things that do not strike me as being faked or peak my interest.
Oh so basically you are being closed minded. You see something, decide it is fake, then not investigate it anymore. Good to know.
I do question things that appear to be borne, more of fantasy or sheer dis-info/mis-info, or potential blatant lies.
Much if not all of this stuff is usually classified as top secret.
No you don't question things. You deny things. Big difference. If you questioned things you would accept answers to those questions regardless if the answer you receive goes against your views.
You and anyone else can sit there all day long and tell me that this and that exists because you have been there and seen it with your own eyes, but the truth is, you haven't.
How do you know that the person telling you their personal experience didn't experience what they say? Are you some all knowing being that just can tell?
The best you can do is to assume what you are told is genuine, based on no more than the study of what has been put on a plate for you to feed off, of which you accept, unconditionally as a fact with no requirement of physical evidence for verification of this supposed fact.
And the best you can do is deny every thing presented to you based no more than on the visions in your head. Which you accept, unconditionally as fact with no requirement of physical evidence for verification of this supposed fact.