A glass dome in the sky is a dumb idea and most people should and do know better

  • 101 Replies
  • 18761 Views
*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30075
You still don't get it, ausGeoff.  A billion people could believe in Santa Clause and 5 people could believe that he does not exist.  The numbers mean nothing.  He could exist or not exist without the numbers.  You seem to just have some kind of "I am right because I follow the herd" attitude.

OK, but how likely is it that a billion adults believe in Santa Claus and only 5 don't? Believing doesn't make it true, but people do tend to believe things that are reasonable and plausible.
Billions of people believe in a god. Is that reasonable and plausible? billions of people believe in ghosts, the after life. Is that reasonable and plausible?
I'm not going to answer either way, I'm just putrting it out that people will believe anything if it's spread out far and wide.
People will buy a brand of food if you saturate their heads with it by advertising it with a good sales technique.
People in their billions can be made to believe anything if it's sold to them on a saturated scale.

Humans are as gullible as hell. We respond to fear or excitement. We sit and smask our hands together and scream if a person in shorts kicks a ball into a net or a person sings a song or whatever.
Every human being can be duped, even the ultra sceptical ones. It just depends on how clever the dupe is.
Most people can be duped when it's as plain as day that they are being played for gullible. It's the nature of the beast.

They say that the secret to a good job is all in the preparation.It's true. It's also true that the secret to a good con, is also in the preparation. You prepare the minds of the people over time so that they accept the con job when it comes.

?

Shmeggley

  • 1909
  • Eppur si muove!
You still don't get it, ausGeoff.  A billion people could believe in Santa Clause and 5 people could believe that he does not exist.  The numbers mean nothing.  He could exist or not exist without the numbers.  You seem to just have some kind of "I am right because I follow the herd" attitude.

OK, but how likely is it that a billion adults believe in Santa Claus and only 5 don't? Believing doesn't make it true, but people do tend to believe things that are reasonable and plausible.
Billions of people believe in a god. Is that reasonable and plausible? billions of people believe in ghosts, the after life. Is that reasonable and plausible?
I'm not going to answer either way, I'm just putrting it out that people will believe anything if it's spread out far and wide.
People will buy a brand of food if you saturate their heads with it by advertising it with a good sales technique.
People in their billions can be made to believe anything if it's sold to them on a saturated scale.

Humans are as gullible as hell. We respond to fear or excitement. We sit and smask our hands together and scream if a person in shorts kicks a ball into a net or a person sings a song or whatever.
Every human being can be duped, even the ultra sceptical ones. It just depends on how clever the dupe is.
Most people can be duped when it's as plain as day that they are being played for gullible. It's the nature of the beast.

They say that the secret to a good job is all in the preparation.It's true. It's also true that the secret to a good con, is also in the preparation. You prepare the minds of the people over time so that they accept the con job when it comes.

That's actually a really good point. Religion is different though. It was the prevailing "theory" of reality for millenia, before people ever critically examined the world around them. But belief in it, and people's passion for sports, are something people are heavily invested in emotionally, and of course that biases people a lot. With science on the other hand, the whole point is to remove human bias from it as far as possible. As a result I don't think the average person has any strong emotional bias towards the shape of the Earth, they just tend to go along with what seems to be the most reasonable explanation, to the extent that they have knowledge of the facts of the matter.
Giess what? I am a tin foil hat conspiracy lunatic who knows nothing... See what I'm getting at here?

You still don't get it, ausGeoff.  A billion people could believe in Santa Clause and 5 people could believe that he does not exist.  The numbers mean nothing.  He could exist or not exist without the numbers.  You seem to just have some kind of "I am right because I follow the herd" attitude.

OK, but how likely is it that a billion adults believe in Santa Claus and only 5 don't? Believing doesn't make it true, but people do tend to believe things that are reasonable and plausible.
Billions of people believe in a god. Is that reasonable and plausible? billions of people believe in ghosts, the after life. Is that reasonable and plausible?
I'm not going to answer either way, I'm just putrting it out that people will believe anything if it's spread out far and wide.
People will buy a brand of food if you saturate their heads with it by advertising it with a good sales technique.
People in their billions can be made to believe anything if it's sold to them on a saturated scale.

Humans are as gullible as hell. We respond to fear or excitement. We sit and smask our hands together and scream if a person in shorts kicks a ball into a net or a person sings a song or whatever.
Every human being can be duped, even the ultra sceptical ones. It just depends on how clever the dupe is.
Most people can be duped when it's as plain as day that they are being played for gullible. It's the nature of the beast.


Yes, yes...but this has absolutely no bearing on the very obvious reality of not living under a giant, perfectly reflective ice dome where even sunsets couldn't exist.  Let alone such subtleties as seasons or the waxing and waning of the moon.  Or nighttime.
Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.

*

macrohard

  • 139
  • IQ over 180
You still don't get it, ausGeoff.  A billion people could believe in Santa Clause and 5 people could believe that he does not exist.  The numbers mean nothing.  He could exist or not exist without the numbers.  You seem to just have some kind of "I am right because I follow the herd" attitude.

OK, but how likely is it that a billion adults believe in Santa Claus and only 5 don't? Believing doesn't make it true, but people do tend to believe things that are reasonable and plausible.
Billions of people believe in a god. Is that reasonable and plausible? billions of people believe in ghosts, the after life. Is that reasonable and plausible?
I'm not going to answer either way, I'm just putrting it out that people will believe anything if it's spread out far and wide.
People will buy a brand of food if you saturate their heads with it by advertising it with a good sales technique.
People in their billions can be made to believe anything if it's sold to them on a saturated scale.

Humans are as gullible as hell. We respond to fear or excitement. We sit and smask our hands together and scream if a person in shorts kicks a ball into a net or a person sings a song or whatever.
Every human being can be duped, even the ultra sceptical ones. It just depends on how clever the dupe is.
Most people can be duped when it's as plain as day that they are being played for gullible. It's the nature of the beast.

They say that the secret to a good job is all in the preparation.It's true. It's also true that the secret to a good con, is also in the preparation. You prepare the minds of the people over time so that they accept the con job when it comes.

The difference is that FE, unlike religion, can be disproved.

With the right technology you can prove the shape of the earth.  You can never prove the non-existence of God.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30075
I don't think the average person has any strong emotional bias towards the shape of the Earth, they just tend to go along with what seems to be the most reasonable explanation, to the extent that they have knowledge of the facts of the matter.
That's just the point. People on the whole (average Joes) don't have a strong emotional bias to the shape of the Earth. They accept the Earth to be what everyone believes it to be, then carry on in their lives probably never giving it a second fore-front thought. It is what it is and that's that.
For anyone to tell them differently, they will be met with, "yeah, ok fine" and that's that, with maybe a roll of the eyes.

Most people can't even wire a plug let alone think on any level of Earth science, other than what's in their faces, physically.

The fact that most pople are not emotionally attached to such science, as in Earth shape, they simply follow the route of the masses. It's like saying to the average Joe "name me a DIY tool?" Most will say a hammer, yet a bricklayer might say a trowel or a carpenter might say a saw, etc.

The truth is, most global earthers come onto this site and tell people that there's billions of people who KNOW the Earth is a globe. They don't KNOW...they are told it is. Those who believe they KNOW are the few who come on here, just as those who believe they know the Earth is flat come on here in their few. The odds are not stacked against the flat Earth as far as this site goes. It's just percieved as stacked odds by those whose beliefs are global Earth ingrained, who have spent the time to actually study what scientists have put on a plate for them

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30075
Yes, yes...but this has absolutely no bearing on the very obvious reality of not living under a giant, perfectly reflective ice dome where even sunsets couldn't exist.  Let alone such subtleties as seasons or the waxing and waning of the moon.  Or nighttime.
In your opinion. Your opinion is based on global Earth saturation of your mind and senses. I know you will deny it but it's the truth.
You can't vision what I vision because you do not and will not follow my thoughts to see if it's actually possible. It's simple not possible to you and that's that.
That's fine, I accept that and I once followed your train of thought. If someone told me the sky was an ice dome, I'd have made my excuses and walked away at one time.


?

rottingroom

  • 4785
  • Around the world.
Fair enough scepti but none of that implies that the masses aren't being told the right information. The masses are told wrong information a lot of the time but not for everything. We can verify the earths shape independently of what we are told.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30075

The difference is that FE, unlike religion, can be disproved.

With the right technology you can prove the shape of the earth.  You can never prove the non-existence of God.
If the Global Earth model is proved beyond any doubt, then why are any of you global Earthers here?
Why are any of you even arguing against a flat or whatever alternate Earth shape? It makes no sense for any of you to argue.
Of course, you can say, " I'm just here for the fun of it" or " I'm just here to laugh at how stupid you all are." That's not the truth though, is it?

So why are you here?
The reality is, you're interested in the alternative theories. They may not make much sense to you, yet...but it's peaked your interest, as it has with many.
You can tell me that you fully believe your model...but deep down, you are questioning it, even if it's minor at the moment.

No person who believes they are intelligent and scientific minded are ever going to admit they could be wrong and maybe they've been fooled.

?

rottingroom

  • 4785
  • Around the world.

The difference is that FE, unlike religion, can be disproved.

With the right technology you can prove the shape of the earth.  You can never prove the non-existence of God.
If the Global Earth model is proved beyond any doubt, then why are any of you global Earthers here?
Why are any of you even arguing against a flat or whatever alternate Earth shape? It makes no sense for any of you to argue.
Of course, you can say, " I'm just here for the fun of it" or " I'm just here to laugh at how stupid you all are." That's not the truth though, is it?

So why are you here?
The reality is, you're interested in the alternative theories. They may not make much sense to you, yet...but it's peaked your interest, as it has with many.
You can tell me that you fully believe your model...but deep down, you are questioning it, even if it's minor at the moment.

No person who believes they are intelligent and scientific minded are ever going to admit they could be wrong and maybe they've been fooled.

Because some people like to argue that the earth is round to people who wrongly believe it to be flat, proves it isn't round? ???

We've told you why we are here. We just enjoy it.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30075
Fair enough scepti but none of that implies that the masses aren't being told the right information. The masses are told wrong information a lot of the time but not for everything. We can verify the earths shape independently of what we are told.
Correct, it doesn't imply that the masses are mis-informed in many cases. You say you can verify the shape of the Earth because you have been shown how to and you take it as the truth.

Here's a little test for you.
Standing outside (theoretically) show me what you would do to convince the person next to you that the Earth is what you say it is. You can use any gadget you can dream up that you can use with your feet on the ground.

how does ice remain solid in space? as at that temperature, it would be a liquid, unless the sun was shining on it, and it would be a gas?
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30075

The difference is that FE, unlike religion, can be disproved.

With the right technology you can prove the shape of the earth.  You can never prove the non-existence of God.
If the Global Earth model is proved beyond any doubt, then why are any of you global Earthers here?
Why are any of you even arguing against a flat or whatever alternate Earth shape? It makes no sense for any of you to argue.
Of course, you can say, " I'm just here for the fun of it" or " I'm just here to laugh at how stupid you all are." That's not the truth though, is it?

So why are you here?
The reality is, you're interested in the alternative theories. They may not make much sense to you, yet...but it's peaked your interest, as it has with many.
You can tell me that you fully believe your model...but deep down, you are questioning it, even if it's minor at the moment.

No person who believes they are intelligent and scientific minded are ever going to admit they could be wrong and maybe they've been fooled.

Because some people like to argue that the earth is round to people who wrongly believe it to be flat, proves it isn't round? ???

We've told you why we are here. We just enjoy it.
I have no doubt you enjoy it. I'm saying that regardless of what gets said ..most people are questioning their beliefs in some way, shape of form and as part of their enjoyment of the site, they are using their thoughts and sitting there thinking, " well maybe."
I know you are doing this. You may deny it but I  believe  that some doubt has been placed into your mind about your overall model.
« Last Edit: July 18, 2014, 07:52:26 AM by sceptimatic »

?

rottingroom

  • 4785
  • Around the world.
Fair enough scepti but none of that implies that the masses aren't being told the right information. The masses are told wrong information a lot of the time but not for everything. We can verify the earths shape independently of what we are told.
Correct, it doesn't imply that the masses are mis-informed in many cases. You say you can verify the shape of the Earth because you have been shown how to and you take it as the truth.

Here's a little test for you.
Standing outside (theoretically) show me what you would do to convince the person next to you that the Earth is what you say it is. You can use any gadget you can dream up that you can use with your feet on the ground.

Foucalt's Pendulum
Eotvos Effect
Seeing further from higher up
Seeing rotation of stars
Observing sinking ships
Yard sticks in two different locations having shadows of different lengths and angles.
Sum of triangles created on surface != 180°
The sun sets
Observe the curvature from a large mountain


?

rottingroom

  • 4785
  • Around the world.

The difference is that FE, unlike religion, can be disproved.

With the right technology you can prove the shape of the earth.  You can never prove the non-existence of God.
If the Global Earth model is proved beyond any doubt, then why are any of you global Earthers here?
Why are any of you even arguing against a flat or whatever alternate Earth shape? It makes no sense for any of you to argue.
Of course, you can say, " I'm just here for the fun of it" or " I'm just here to laugh at how stupid you all are." That's not the truth though, is it?

So why are you here?
The reality is, you're interested in the alternative theories. They may not make much sense to you, yet...but it's peaked your interest, as it has with many.
You can tell me that you fully believe your model...but deep down, you are questioning it, even if it's minor at the moment.

No person who believes they are intelligent and scientific minded are ever going to admit they could be wrong and maybe they've been fooled.

Because some people like to argue that the earth is round to people who wrongly believe it to be flat, proves it isn't round? ???

We've told you why we are here. We just enjoy it.
I have no doubt you enjoy it. I'm saying that regardless of what gets said ..most people are questioning their beliefs in some way, shape of form and as part of their enjoyment of the site, they are using their thoughts and sitting there thinking, " well maybe."
I know you are doing this. You may deny it but I  believe  that some doubt has been placed into your mind about your overall model.

Nah scepti. The only thing I have doubts about are which FE'rs are trolls and which one's really believe what they say they do.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30075
how does ice remain solid in space? as at that temperature, it would be a liquid, unless the sun was shining on it, and it would be a gas?
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
Excellent video. If people look at this and allow themselves to think, they will see how my dome works.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30075
Fair enough scepti but none of that implies that the masses aren't being told the right information. The masses are told wrong information a lot of the time but not for everything. We can verify the earths shape independently of what we are told.
Correct, it doesn't imply that the masses are mis-informed in many cases. You say you can verify the shape of the Earth because you have been shown how to and you take it as the truth.

Here's a little test for you.
Standing outside (theoretically) show me what you would do to convince the person next to you that the Earth is what you say it is. You can use any gadget you can dream up that you can use with your feet on the ground.

Foucalt's Pendulum
Eotvos Effect
Seeing further from higher up
Seeing rotation of stars
Observing sinking ships
Yard sticks in two different locations having shadows of different lengths and angles.
Sum of triangles created on surface != 180°
The sun sets
Observe the curvature from a large mountain
You know that none of them prove anything other than to simply say they do.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30075

The difference is that FE, unlike religion, can be disproved.

With the right technology you can prove the shape of the earth.  You can never prove the non-existence of God.
If the Global Earth model is proved beyond any doubt, then why are any of you global Earthers here?
Why are any of you even arguing against a flat or whatever alternate Earth shape? It makes no sense for any of you to argue.
Of course, you can say, " I'm just here for the fun of it" or " I'm just here to laugh at how stupid you all are." That's not the truth though, is it?

So why are you here?
The reality is, you're interested in the alternative theories. They may not make much sense to you, yet...but it's peaked your interest, as it has with many.
You can tell me that you fully believe your model...but deep down, you are questioning it, even if it's minor at the moment.

No person who believes they are intelligent and scientific minded are ever going to admit they could be wrong and maybe they've been fooled.

Because some people like to argue that the earth is round to people who wrongly believe it to be flat, proves it isn't round? ???

We've told you why we are here. We just enjoy it.
I have no doubt you enjoy it. I'm saying that regardless of what gets said ..most people are questioning their beliefs in some way, shape of form and as part of their enjoyment of the site, they are using their thoughts and sitting there thinking, " well maybe."
I know you are doing this. You may deny it but I  believe  that some doubt has been placed into your mind about your overall model.

Nah scepti. The only thing I have doubts about are which FE'rs are trolls and which one's really believe what they say they do.
You're a smart person. I refuse to accept that you believe all what you are told. I seriously do refuse to accept it.

?

rottingroom

  • 4785
  • Around the world.
Fair enough scepti but none of that implies that the masses aren't being told the right information. The masses are told wrong information a lot of the time but not for everything. We can verify the earths shape independently of what we are told.
Correct, it doesn't imply that the masses are mis-informed in many cases. You say you can verify the shape of the Earth because you have been shown how to and you take it as the truth.

Here's a little test for you.
Standing outside (theoretically) show me what you would do to convince the person next to you that the Earth is what you say it is. You can use any gadget you can dream up that you can use with your feet on the ground.

Foucalt's Pendulum
Eotvos Effect
Seeing further from higher up
Seeing rotation of stars
Observing sinking ships
Yard sticks in two different locations having shadows of different lengths and angles.
Sum of triangles created on surface != 180°
The sun sets
Observe the curvature from a large mountain
You know that none of them prove anything other than to simply say they do.

No scepti, this is empirical proof that the earth isn't flat. You just deny it. That's fine that you do, it has no bearing on what is really going on. It says a whole lot about you though.


The difference is that FE, unlike religion, can be disproved.

With the right technology you can prove the shape of the earth.  You can never prove the non-existence of God.
If the Global Earth model is proved beyond any doubt, then why are any of you global Earthers here?
Why are any of you even arguing against a flat or whatever alternate Earth shape? It makes no sense for any of you to argue.
Of course, you can say, " I'm just here for the fun of it" or " I'm just here to laugh at how stupid you all are." That's not the truth though, is it?

So why are you here?
The reality is, you're interested in the alternative theories. They may not make much sense to you, yet...but it's peaked your interest, as it has with many.
You can tell me that you fully believe your model...but deep down, you are questioning it, even if it's minor at the moment.

No person who believes they are intelligent and scientific minded are ever going to admit they could be wrong and maybe they've been fooled.

Because some people like to argue that the earth is round to people who wrongly believe it to be flat, proves it isn't round? ???

We've told you why we are here. We just enjoy it.
I have no doubt you enjoy it. I'm saying that regardless of what gets said ..most people are questioning their beliefs in some way, shape of form and as part of their enjoyment of the site, they are using their thoughts and sitting there thinking, " well maybe."
I know you are doing this. You may deny it but I  believe  that some doubt has been placed into your mind about your overall model.

Nah scepti. The only thing I have doubts about are which FE'rs are trolls and which one's really believe what they say they do.
You're a smart person. I refuse to accept that you believe all what you are told. I seriously do refuse to accept it.

I don't believe what I'm told simply because I was told to. I believe it because it I've proven to myself that it is true. This notion that you attempt to invoke that science is like a religion is absurd too. Sure, there are supporters of science that are as obnoxious as a mormon knocking on your door, but that is no fault of science and if I was one to believe what I am told then I would certainly be a religious person. Your notion that everyone believes what they are told is silly anyways. Religosity and science, most of the time, oppose each other. One can't really believe in both and simultaneously believe everything they are told.

?

Shmeggley

  • 1909
  • Eppur si muove!
I don't think the average person has any strong emotional bias towards the shape of the Earth, they just tend to go along with what seems to be the most reasonable explanation, to the extent that they have knowledge of the facts of the matter.
That's just the point. People on the whole (average Joes) don't have a strong emotional bias to the shape of the Earth. They accept the Earth to be what everyone believes it to be, then carry on in their lives probably never giving it a second fore-front thought. It is what it is and that's that.
For anyone to tell them differently, they will be met with, "yeah, ok fine" and that's that, with maybe a roll of the eyes.

Most people can't even wire a plug let alone think on any level of Earth science, other than what's in their faces, physically.

The fact that most pople are not emotionally attached to such science, as in Earth shape, they simply follow the route of the masses. It's like saying to the average Joe "name me a DIY tool?" Most will say a hammer, yet a bricklayer might say a trowel or a carpenter might say a saw, etc.

The truth is, most global earthers come onto this site and tell people that there's billions of people who KNOW the Earth is a globe. They don't KNOW...they are told it is. Those who believe they KNOW are the few who come on here, just as those who believe they know the Earth is flat come on here in their few. The odds are not stacked against the flat Earth as far as this site goes. It's just percieved as stacked odds by those whose beliefs are global Earth ingrained, who have spent the time to actually study what scientists have put on a plate for them

You're right that the average person probably doesn't know how he knows what he knows, he just knows that's what he was taught. But there is still a significant portion of people who do question things and do take the time and effort to check - and they find that the theories actually do work and are correct. I haven't seen anyone on this site yet put forward a flat Earth explanation or theory that wasn't based on some misunderstanding or ignorance about science. I'm still hopeful though.
Giess what? I am a tin foil hat conspiracy lunatic who knows nothing... See what I'm getting at here?

Standing outside (theoretically) show me what you would do to convince the person next to you that the Earth is what you say it is. You can use any gadget you can dream up that you can use with your feet on the ground.
Don't need a gadget.  Just stand and watch ships "sink" below the horizon.  Then we could then watch a sunset.  We could stand for a month and watch the phases of the moon.  If you want to use gadgets I could show them photos of the earth from space, or use my GPS device, or set up a satellite dish and watch TV.  We could calculate the diameter of the earth with sticks and shadows.  And so on.


Now you tell me how you would convince them of a perfectly reflective ice dome above a flat, none rotating earth and that the sun, moon and stars are actually on earth etc.
Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30075
Standing outside (theoretically) show me what you would do to convince the person next to you that the Earth is what you say it is. You can use any gadget you can dream up that you can use with your feet on the ground.
Don't need a gadget.  Just stand and watch ships "sink" below the horizon.  Then we could then watch a sunset.  We could stand for a month and watch the phases of the moon.  If you want to use gadgets I could show them photos of the earth from space, or use my GPS device, or set up a satellite dish and watch TV.  We could calculate the diameter of the earth with sticks and shadows.  And so on.


Now you tell me how you would convince them of a perfectly reflective ice dome above a flat, none rotating earth and that the sun, moon and stars are actually on earth etc.
I could just use exactly the same stuff you use and that proves it for me about what I'm saying.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 43052
Here's a little test for you.
Standing outside (theoretically) show me what you would do to convince the person next to you that the Earth is what you say it is. You can use any gadget you can dream up that you can use with your feet on the ground.
I would show them a sunset.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

rottingroom

  • 4785
  • Around the world.
Standing outside (theoretically) show me what you would do to convince the person next to you that the Earth is what you say it is. You can use any gadget you can dream up that you can use with your feet on the ground.
Don't need a gadget.  Just stand and watch ships "sink" below the horizon.  Then we could then watch a sunset.  We could stand for a month and watch the phases of the moon.  If you want to use gadgets I could show them photos of the earth from space, or use my GPS device, or set up a satellite dish and watch TV.  We could calculate the diameter of the earth with sticks and shadows.  And so on.


Now you tell me how you would convince them of a perfectly reflective ice dome above a flat, none rotating earth and that the sun, moon and stars are actually on earth etc.
I could just use exactly the same stuff you use and that proves it for me about what I'm saying.

LOL

Please tell us how:

Foucalt's Pendulum proves the earth isn't turning
Eotvos Effect proves the earth isn't turning
Seeing further from higher up proves the earth is flat
Seeing rotation of stars proves that their rotation doesn't depend on your location on a round earth
Observing sinking ships proves the earth is flat
Yard sticks in two different locations having shadows of different lengths and angles proves the earth is flat
Sum of triangles created on surface != 180° proves the earth is flat
The sun setting proves the earth is flat
Observe the curvature from a large mountain proves the earth is flat

Scepti, it's comments like this that reinforces our accusations when we say that you don't understand anything about anything.

?

Shmeggley

  • 1909
  • Eppur si muove!
how does ice remain solid in space? as at that temperature, it would be a liquid, unless the sun was shining on it, and it would be a gas?
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
Excellent video. If people look at this and allow themselves to think, they will see how my dome works.

Both videos are fascinating and well explained. I can't see though how you think this give any legitimacy to your ice dome model. The videos show what happens when you take cold nitrogen and pull a vacuum on it. In your model, you have a vacuum pulling against the ice but with air pressure from underneath. As you see in the video, as soon as you go above .14 atm pressure, it reverts to liquid. Also, they pointed out that it only freezes because the nitrogen is allowed to cool by evaporation - this will not work if you have a heat source - like the sun - next to it. You also need somewhere for that evaporation to escape to - in your model, "nothing gets in, nothing gets out". Finally, the solid nitrogen is in absolutely no way a perfectly smooth and perfectly reflective surface.
Giess what? I am a tin foil hat conspiracy lunatic who knows nothing... See what I'm getting at here?

That's why wherever the sun is, the sky is melting.  The hydrogen particles create their own heat with low pressure, as seen in the video when it boils.  It will return to a solid when it reaches it's lowest possible pressure up there.  Actually, here's the definition of boiling, just for clarification:
Boiling is the rapid vaporization of a liquid, which occurs when a liquid is heated to its boiling point, the temperature at which the vapor pressure of the liquid is equal to the pressure exerted on the liquid by the surrounding environmental pressure.
« Last Edit: July 18, 2014, 09:05:33 AM by EarthIsASpaceship »

?

Shmeggley

  • 1909
  • Eppur si muove!
That's why wherever the sun is, the sky is melting.  The hydrogen particles create their own heat with low pressure, as seen in the video when it boils.  It will return to a solid when it reaches it's lowest possible pressure up there.  Actually, here's the definition of boiling, just for clarification:
Boiling is the rapid vaporization of a liquid, which occurs when a liquid is heated to its boiling point, the temperature at which the vapor pressure of the liquid is equal to the pressure exerted on the liquid by the surrounding environmental pressure.

It just doesn't make any sense. What you say is happening with your dome is not what is happening in the video. It's not like the dark side of the Earth is plunged into subzero temperatures cold enough to form solid nitrogen every night. You'd expect the nitrogen to freeze on the surface, not up in the sky. And even if it did freeze up there, it's not a shiny smooth reflective surface. It's like a fluffy nitrogen snowball.
Giess what? I am a tin foil hat conspiracy lunatic who knows nothing... See what I'm getting at here?

*

ausGeoff

  • 6091
You still don't get it, ausGeoff.  A billion people could believe in Santa Clause and 5 people could believe that he does not exist.
This is getting ridiculous!  Your hypothesis is irrelevant, simply because (hopefully LOL) a billion people don't believe in Santa Claus. 

A scientific hypothesis is a proposition tendered as an explanation for the occurrence of some specified phenomenon accepted as highly probable in the light of established facts.  Your Santa Claus example fails this test.  Sorry.

Quote
You seem to just have some kind of "I am right because I follow the herd" attitude.
If you mean by "herd" those 6,000,000 scientists who accept the round earth model, then you're quite correct.  Can you tell me the names of a few of the "herd" of flat earth scientists you apparently follow?  And how large is that "herd" of flat earthers you follow?  500 or 5,000, or 5 million maybe?

—Or do you not follow any herd at all, but just make up the factoids you accept in your own mind, devoid of any scientific input?




*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • Planar Moderator
  • 37834
  • I have artificial intelligence
You seem to just have some kind of "I am right because I follow the herd" attitude.
If you mean by "herd" those 6,000,000 scientists who accept the round earth model, then you're quite correct.  Can you tell me the names of a few of the "herd" of flat earth scientists you apparently follow?  And how large is that "herd" of flat earthers you follow?  500 or 5,000, or 5 million maybe?

—Or do you not follow any herd at all, but just make up the factoids you accept in your own mind, devoid of any scientific input?




[/quote]

Every time I give you names of FE scientists, you brush them away as the person joking, lying, or simply being mistaken.  I am not going to waste my time giving you any more names. 

*

ausGeoff

  • 6091
Every time I give you names of FE scientists, you brush them away as the person joking, lying, or simply being mistaken.  I am not going to waste my time giving you any more names.

I can't find any posts wherein you named even half a dozen flat earth scientists jroa

Can you please take a minute to name them again for me.  I've also asked the same question of several other flat earthers here, but so far no names have been forthcoming for flat earth scientists.

Here's the names of six "round earth" scientists—right off the top of my head—no need for Google:  Carl Sagan, Murray Gell-Mann, Stephen Hawking, Richard Dawkins, Roger Penrose, Craig Venter.

Can you name six flat earth scientists straight off the top of your head—without Google?  I'm betting you can't.


*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • Planar Moderator
  • 37834
  • I have artificial intelligence
Maybe I can job your memory.  You asked for a single name of a FE scientist.  I provided 3 names.  You then began to dismiss them with no evidence, and then raised the stakes to 6 names.  I then backed out because it was a waste of time.  Sound familiar?