REs Please Explain

Quote from: jroa on July 13, 2014, 11:54:29 PM

The satanists at NASA come up with all kinds of ploys to divert your attention.  You people just lap it up, like a kitten with a saucer of cream.  I feel sorry for you.

Rather than wasting your time "feeling sorry" for round earthers jroa, you should spend a bit more time researching our geophysical and astrophysical models—and comparing how they comply with every observable and replicable phenomena on earth with those suggested by the flat earth model.

The flat earth hypothesis is sorely lacking in any empirical data that explains myriad naturally occurring phenomena on our planet or in the skies.  It's also lacking in any support whatsoever from the scientific fraternity.  And again, no flat earther on this forum has been able to name even a half dozen accredited scientists who accept that the earth is (allegedly) flat.  Why not?

From my standpoint, I consider it's the round earthers who should be feeling sorry for the flat earthers—judging by the obvious lack of scientific knowledge repeatedly displayed on these forums.  One of the reasons I post stuff here is in an attempt to at least get some flat earthers to consider—even for a nanosecond—that their flat earth model could be wrong, or that a lot of the round earth theory does make sense.

Intellectual inflexibility and  dogmatic opinion inevitably blind one to the ultimate truth.  Consider Galileo's heliocentric model and the Roman Inquisition as a classic example of this.  (Although I know that flat earthers still consider that the sun orbits the earth, rather than the other way around.)

Perhaps, next time, you can have a defensible position when injecting yourself into a debate.  As it stands, you simply try your hardest to make a witty ad hominem attack that ends up making you look silly.  Put a little effort into it for a change.  Your little ramblings are getting a little old and really seem to dumb down many of the debates you try to enter. 

Perhaps, next time, you can have a defensible position when injecting yourself into a debate.  As it stands, you simply try your hardest to make a witty ad hominem attack that ends up making you look silly.  Put a little effort into it for a change.  Your little ramblings are getting a little old and really seem to dumb down many of the debates you try to enter.

And yet another of jroa's embarrassingly obvious attempts to derail the thread simply because he's unable to address my claim that:  "The flat earth hypothesis is sorely lacking in any empirical data that explains myriad naturally occurring phenomena on our planet or in the skies.  It's also lacking in any support whatsoever from the scientific fraternity.  And again, no flat earther on this forum has been able to name even a half dozen accredited scientists who accept that the earth is (allegedly) flat.  Why not?"

—Rather than attacking my "little ramblings" jroa, maybe you'd look a little more scientifically literate if you answered these questions of mine.  Or don't you have any answers maybe?