I can't be the only one who thinks that requiring an idea to be checked by a bunch of people and used productively in some demanding application before taking it seriously makes me less gullible than some (quite hypothetical) person who takes at face value, the word of nobodies, cranks and the imaginatively paranoid whenever their ramblings feel like they gel just right with our (hypothetical) person's intuitions.
Can I?
I've had a fundamentalist Christian call me, pretty heatedly, to my face, that I was just putting my faith in Richard Dawkins (or Darwin or something, I forget) whereas he put his in God, so what's the difference. He was sure that they were absolutely equivalent things. But surely anyone here can see that the scientific method is by definition the act of not taking things on faith. It's being sceptical, forever.