A glass dome in the sky? Really?

  • 221 Replies
  • 61432 Views
A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« on: June 10, 2014, 10:46:38 AM »
In another thread or two I've seen reference to a "glass dome" in the sky that is believed - by some - to exist. Is this a core tenet of FE hypothesis or only something believed by the lunatic fringe?

Also, do believers believe that this dome is actually made of glass? If not, what exactly do they/you suggest it does, in fact, consist of?

Thirdly, does it encircle the Earth or only encase the "top".

Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2014, 11:07:40 AM »

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2014, 11:09:42 AM »
First of all, not many sibscribe to it. I do and one or two others on here.
The dome is ICE, made up of frozen helium, hydrogen, nitrogen, etc depending on positition in the natural build of it.
It covers all the solid ground we exist on to a unknown height. Maybe 50 miles high as a wild guess.
There is definitely a dome, of this I am certain, because it makes perfect sense.

What does not make any sense is an atmosphere around a ball that somehow stays in place as a gas. It's preposterous and people really need to start thinking for themselves instead of mocking the dome, seriously.

*

JimmyTheCrab

  • 10340
  • +0/-5
Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2014, 11:10:36 AM »
In another thread or two I've seen reference to a "glass dome" in the sky that is believed - by some
I think it is just scepti.  I very much doubt he actually believes it: he hasn't got much to do, so trolls forums with made up shit.  He likes the attention.

He says it is ice, not glass: it is frozen gas.  The sun is actually at the South pole, and what we all the sun and the moon are just reflections on the ice.  Stars are some kind of radiation, or something, reflected.  Oh, and there isn't anything at all outside of dome - no universe, nothing at all....blah....blah...blah.

He's always threatening to make a diagram of how this bollocks works, but of course never does, as it is all his made up gibberings.
Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.

Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #4 on: June 10, 2014, 11:17:58 AM »
Crab, do some research on how crystals are formed.  COMPACTED ICE and/or water at high temp.  Crystal is natural glass.

?

rottingroom

  • 4785
  • +0/-0
  • Around the world.
Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #5 on: June 10, 2014, 11:19:49 AM »
So with this dome there is a sunset right? The sun is projected onto the side of the dome and there we have it, sunset. So if that is happening then where on earth is someone simultaneously experiencing an overhead noon sun?

Not possible. Good bye dome hypothesis.

Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2014, 11:24:53 AM »
It is never projected on the sides.  The sun doesn't reach that far on the Antarctica rim.

?

rottingroom

  • 4785
  • +0/-0
  • Around the world.
Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #7 on: June 10, 2014, 11:27:19 AM »
It is never projected on the sides.  The sun doesn't reach that far on the Antarctica rim.

So then it never reaches near the bottom of the dome to look like a sunset. It also never looks like an ellipse like it should if it was a flat projection. Seriously, it makes no sense.

Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #8 on: June 10, 2014, 11:35:09 AM »
As discussed in the other thread recently, it is an ILLUSION that the sun is as low as the Earth landscape.  The reason it is always a perfect circle is because it never gets far enough away from the observer before the landscape cuts it off.  End of debate.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #9 on: June 10, 2014, 11:37:12 AM »
So with this dome there is a sunset right? The sun is projected onto the side of the dome and there we have it, sunset. So if that is happening then where on earth is someone simultaneously experiencing an overhead noon sun?

Not possible. Good bye dome hypothesis.
Take a bit of time and actually look into what's been said over time and you might grasp it. You are in dismissal mode and always have been, so you probably won't ever grasp it, which is fine. You have your thoughts, so stick to them. It's all on a plate for you and others, so go with the done work, it's much easier and you have the backing of billions.
I've had the experience of looking at it all, including being brainwashed with the silly spinning globe, yet I choose what fits better and pick my way through it. You are scared to take that step because you fear ridicule like most people do. You're simply not strong enough to think for yourself against what's been drilled into you.
That's not meant as a dig, it's merely saying that most people, including yourself cannot see past one story, because the story fits perfectly in your mind and you are more than willing to accept the get out of jail free cards that have been pulled to make it fit; like air to solid rotation and gravity; warped space time and a whole host of other absolute bull shit that it sickens me to think that people cannot see past this charade, yet here we are seeing it.

The problem is, I was one of you, except I simply blindly accepted it without actually looking deep into it, so I was easy meat, like the billions of others are.
Very few people can actually grasp the workings of a globe.
The best that most will know is we live on a ball and it rotates in space around the sun and gravity makes things fall or stick to the ground. That's it!

People like you have studied it all, which makes you the weakest of the weak, because it shows that your brainwashing is so severe that it's caused you to abandon logic, of which your senses should have kicked in. Maybe one day. Maybe one day.

*

Rama Set

  • 6875
  • +1/-0
  • I am also an engineer
Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #10 on: June 10, 2014, 11:41:04 AM »
As discussed in the other thread recently, it is an ILLUSION that the sun is as low as the Earth landscape.  The reason it is always a perfect circle is because it never gets far enough away from the observer before the landscape cuts it off.  End of debate.

Was that the same thread where Rottingroom pointed out that the sun would never get within 10 degrees of the horizon on a FE? And then you invoke an illusion with no evidence so that your world can now fit observation?  That is what you are talking about right?
Aether is the  characteristic of action or inaction of charged  & noncharged particals.

?

rottingroom

  • 4785
  • +0/-0
  • Around the world.
Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #11 on: June 10, 2014, 11:47:57 AM »
Blah blah blah scepti. Your hypothesis makes no sense.

Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #12 on: June 10, 2014, 11:56:40 AM »
As discussed in the other thread recently, it is an ILLUSION that the sun is as low as the Earth landscape.  The reason it is always a perfect circle is because it never gets far enough away from the observer before the landscape cuts it off.  End of debate.

Was that the same thread where Rottingroom pointed out that the sun would never get within 10 degrees of the horizon on a FE? And then you invoke an illusion with no evidence so that your world can now fit observation?  That is what you are talking about right?
And his equation was wrong for the simple fact that we can see less distance of the Earth landscape than we do distance of objects in the sky.  HEIGHT MAKES A HUGE DIFFERENCE.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #13 on: June 10, 2014, 12:04:33 PM »
Blah blah blah scepti. Your hypothesis makes no sense.
Like I said. It makes no sense to those who ridicule it at first point. Only a deep thinking attitude will gain anyone an insight into it all. Something that most refuse to do. But like I said, it's up to the individual what they go with, as it is with me.

Keeping the science world space theories firmly implanted will gain you no alternative headway. Fir enough I say.

?

rottingroom

  • 4785
  • +0/-0
  • Around the world.
Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #14 on: June 10, 2014, 12:09:15 PM »
As discussed in the other thread recently, it is an ILLUSION that the sun is as low as the Earth landscape.  The reason it is always a perfect circle is because it never gets far enough away from the observer before the landscape cuts it off.  End of debate.

Was that the same thread where Rottingroom pointed out that the sun would never get within 10 degrees of the horizon on a FE? And then you invoke an illusion with no evidence so that your world can now fit observation?  That is what you are talking about right?
And his equation was wrong for the simple fact that we can see less distance of the Earth landscape than we do distance of objects in the sky.  HEIGHT MAKES A HUGE DIFFERENCE.

The height of the object in the sky (the sun) was accounted for in the equation. Oblivious.

3000 miles is already absurdly low enough. Any lower and you are getting dramatic ellipses. Period.

The game is over. We have proven the earth is round. It's just a matter of seeing a shrink now. I can find some for you if you need me to.

*

th3rm0m3t3r0

  • At least 3 words, please.
  • 4696
  • +0/-0
  • It's SCIENCE!
Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #15 on: June 10, 2014, 12:32:04 PM »
Lunatic fringe. Next question.


I don't profess to be correct.
Quote from: sceptimatic
I am correct.

?

rottingroom

  • 4785
  • +0/-0
  • Around the world.
Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #16 on: June 10, 2014, 12:39:44 PM »
Blah blah blah scepti. Your hypothesis makes no sense.
Like I said. It makes no sense to those who ridicule it at first point. Only a deep thinking attitude will gain anyone an insight into it all. Something that most refuse to do. But like I said, it's up to the individual what they go with, as it is with me.

Keeping the science world space theories firmly implanted will gain you no alternative headway. Fir enough I say.

If only you actually did satisfactorily contend our arguments then a response like this would be warranted. If anyone does take the time to read the novel that's on these forums concerning your horrible hypothesis then it's plain as day. You haven't been able to keep your ideas together. You respond with ways to satisfy your theory which breaks other responses. It is unsound. It is incorrect. It is not reality.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45115
  • +87/-130
Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #17 on: June 10, 2014, 12:42:43 PM »
Crab, do some research on how crystals are formed.  COMPACTED ICE and/or water at high temp.  Crystal is natural glass.
No.  Glass does not have a regular crystalline structure.  Glass is a class of  amorphous solid.  Sceptimatic's "ice dome" of frozen helium, hydrogen, etc., would require temperatures very close to absolute zero.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

th3rm0m3t3r0

  • At least 3 words, please.
  • 4696
  • +0/-0
  • It's SCIENCE!
Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #18 on: June 10, 2014, 12:42:52 PM »
Blah blah blah scepti. Your hypothesis makes no sense.
Like I said. It makes no sense to those who ridicule it at first point. Only a deep thinking attitude will gain anyone an insight into it all. Something that most refuse to do. But like I said, it's up to the individual what they go with, as it is with me.

Keeping the science world space theories firmly implanted will gain you no alternative headway. Fir enough I say.

If only you actually did satisfactorily contend our arguments then a response like this would be warranted. If anyone does take the time to read the novel that's on these forums concerning your horrible hypothesis then it's plain as day. You haven't been able to keep your ideas together. You respond with ways to satisfy your theory which breaks other responses. It is unsound. It is incorrect. It is not reality.
Almost makes me wonder why you're wasting your time.


I don't profess to be correct.
Quote from: sceptimatic
I am correct.

?

rottingroom

  • 4785
  • +0/-0
  • Around the world.
Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #19 on: June 10, 2014, 12:46:40 PM »
Blah blah blah scepti. Your hypothesis makes no sense.
Like I said. It makes no sense to those who ridicule it at first point. Only a deep thinking attitude will gain anyone an insight into it all. Something that most refuse to do. But like I said, it's up to the individual what they go with, as it is with me.

Keeping the science world space theories firmly implanted will gain you no alternative headway. Fir enough I say.

If only you actually did satisfactorily contend our arguments then a response like this would be warranted. If anyone does take the time to read the novel that's on these forums concerning your horrible hypothesis then it's plain as day. You haven't been able to keep your ideas together. You respond with ways to satisfy your theory which breaks other responses. It is unsound. It is incorrect. It is not reality.
Almost makes me wonder why you're wasting your time.

I can't help myself. Oh, and boredom. It's not as bad as wasting time pretending to be a flat earther.

*

th3rm0m3t3r0

  • At least 3 words, please.
  • 4696
  • +0/-0
  • It's SCIENCE!
Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #20 on: June 10, 2014, 12:48:57 PM »
Blah blah blah scepti. Your hypothesis makes no sense.
Like I said. It makes no sense to those who ridicule it at first point. Only a deep thinking attitude will gain anyone an insight into it all. Something that most refuse to do. But like I said, it's up to the individual what they go with, as it is with me.

Keeping the science world space theories firmly implanted will gain you no alternative headway. Fir enough I say.

If only you actually did satisfactorily contend our arguments then a response like this would be warranted. If anyone does take the time to read the novel that's on these forums concerning your horrible hypothesis then it's plain as day. You haven't been able to keep your ideas together. You respond with ways to satisfy your theory which breaks other responses. It is unsound. It is incorrect. It is not reality.
Almost makes me wonder why you're wasting your time.

I can't help myself. Oh, and boredom. It's not as bad as wasting time pretending to be a flat earther.
Pretending?
I'm offended.


I don't profess to be correct.
Quote from: sceptimatic
I am correct.

Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #21 on: June 10, 2014, 12:51:05 PM »
The height of the object in the sky (the sun) was accounted for in the equation. Oblivious.

3000 miles is already absurdly low enough. Any lower and you are getting dramatic ellipses. Period.

The game is over. We have proven the earth is round. It's just a matter of seeing a shrink now. I can find some for you if you need me to.
No YOU'RE oblivious....to everything I've been explaining to you.   ::)  You accounted for the height but NOT the distance of the sun.  The sun is BEYOND the landscape.

Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #22 on: June 10, 2014, 12:56:16 PM »
The game is over. We have proven the earth is round. It's just a matter of seeing a shrink now. I can find some for you if you need me to.
You and most others here are the one's who will need a shrink when the truth is either revealed to the world or you realize it before then.  Either way, makes no difference to me.  I don't go around calling people names and ridiculing them like you do.

?

rottingroom

  • 4785
  • +0/-0
  • Around the world.
Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #23 on: June 10, 2014, 12:56:41 PM »
The height of the object in the sky (the sun) was accounted for in the equation. Oblivious.

3000 miles is already absurdly low enough. Any lower and you are getting dramatic ellipses. Period.

The game is over. We have proven the earth is round. It's just a matter of seeing a shrink now. I can find some for you if you need me to.
No YOU'RE oblivious....to everything I've been explaining to you.   ::)  You accounted for the height but NOT the distance of the sun.  The sun is BEYOND the landscape.

Haha. No.

I accounted for both. I'm sorry that you don't understand basic geometry.

The distance can be anything. You can make it a billion if you want. The sun will still never be below the horizon.

?

rottingroom

  • 4785
  • +0/-0
  • Around the world.
Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #24 on: June 10, 2014, 12:57:46 PM »
The game is over. We have proven the earth is round. It's just a matter of seeing a shrink now. I can find some for you if you need me to.
You and most others here are the one's who will need a shrink when the truth is either revealed to the world or you realize it before then.  Either way, makes no difference to me.  I don't go around calling people names and ridiculing them like you do.

Will never happen idiot.

?

inquisitive

  • 5108
  • +0/-0
Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #25 on: June 10, 2014, 12:59:39 PM »
The height of the object in the sky (the sun) was accounted for in the equation. Oblivious.

3000 miles is already absurdly low enough. Any lower and you are getting dramatic ellipses. Period.

The game is over. We have proven the earth is round. It's just a matter of seeing a shrink now. I can find some for you if you need me to.
No YOU'RE oblivious....to everything I've been explaining to you.   ::)  You accounted for the height but NOT the distance of the sun.  The sun is BEYOND the landscape.
So 3000 miles high, what is the path over the earth at different times of the year?

Beyond the landscape, explain. 

Measured angles of the sun from across the earth are consistent with its location and a round earth.

Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #26 on: June 10, 2014, 01:03:49 PM »
If only you actually did satisfactorily contend our arguments then a response like this would be warranted. If anyone does take the time to read the novel that's on these forums concerning your horrible hypothesis then it's plain as day. You haven't been able to keep your ideas together. You respond with ways to satisfy your theory which breaks other responses. It is unsound. It is incorrect. It is not reality.
I'd like to see YOU try and fit the pieces of a jigsaw this big together BY YOURSELF and maybe a few others.  It'a a lot of damn work and time.  The mainstream model has had more people and more time to put it all together.  It's science fiction, not truth.  I will laugh my ass off when you realize what a fool you've been.  You need to humble yourself and stop being so egotistical and acting intellectually superior. 

?

rottingroom

  • 4785
  • +0/-0
  • Around the world.
Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #27 on: June 10, 2014, 01:06:17 PM »
So you admit that your hypothesis makes no sense and that earth being round does? Welcome to senseville.

Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #28 on: June 10, 2014, 01:07:57 PM »
Haha. No.

I accounted for both. I'm sorry that you don't understand basic geometry.

The distance can be anything. You can make it a billion if you want. The sun will still never be below the horizon.
I see you STILL don't get it.  The point is not ONE distance.  There are TWO...the landscape (dry Earth or sea) and the object in the sky.  TWO DISTANCES.  UNDERSTAND?

*

th3rm0m3t3r0

  • At least 3 words, please.
  • 4696
  • +0/-0
  • It's SCIENCE!
Re: A glass dome in the sky? Really?
« Reply #29 on: June 10, 2014, 01:08:52 PM »
The game is over. We have proven the earth is round. It's just a matter of seeing a shrink now. I can find some for you if you need me to.
You and most others here are the one's who will need a shrink when the truth is either revealed to the world or you realize it before then.  Either way, makes no difference to me.  I don't go around calling people names and ridiculing them like you do.

Will never happen, idiot.
Needless ad hominem.... did you do that on purpose?
Fixed it for you as well.


I don't profess to be correct.
Quote from: sceptimatic
I am correct.