WAVES on the moon

  • 44 Replies
  • 6986 Views
*

dephelis

  • 479
  • Sine scientia ars nihil est.
Re: WAVES on the moon
« Reply #30 on: May 11, 2014, 04:19:30 PM »
Click on the guy's channel, he has a video of his equipment.  Do you have hours of video footage of the moon?

Hours? Try days/weeks taken over the last four or so years.

Re: WAVES on the moon
« Reply #31 on: May 11, 2014, 06:05:56 PM »
Click on the guy's channel, he has a video of his equipment.  Do you have hours of video footage of the moon?

Hours? Try days/weeks taken over the last four or so years.
Not total time.  How about continuous time?

Re: WAVES on the moon
« Reply #32 on: May 11, 2014, 06:15:00 PM »
If you calculate the speed of the wave it is about 800,000 mile an hour. Does that make sense to anybody. Listen to the explanation in the video at time 4:16. He why there is a wave in the video.

#t=257" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">#t=257

Also Crrow777 makes money through to donations to pay for his equipment. He has a motive to make these types of videos.
The wave is not going that fast.  Nor are the asteroids and ufos as enormous as they say.  Because the moon simply is NOT that big.  As far as the money motive, I understand your point.  However, considering that he is using the money to upgrade his equipment and that he is doing what many would like to themselves but can't for one reason or another, I see no problem in  people helping to support him.  He presents the videos to the public for all to see.  There are much worse things people do with donation money.

Re: WAVES on the moon
« Reply #33 on: May 11, 2014, 06:34:10 PM »
I meant the moon is not as big as we're told.  Work those figures for a 30 mile wide moon.

?

BJ1234

  • 1931
Re: WAVES on the moon
« Reply #34 on: May 11, 2014, 08:08:55 PM »
Well, if the moon were 20 miles, in diameter, the wave would move a factor of 100 slower.  Or still 12,000 miles per hour.  So since you are claiming the moon is 30 miles in diameter, the wave would move 50% faster than that last figure, or 18,000 miles per hour.

Re: WAVES on the moon
« Reply #35 on: May 11, 2014, 10:02:27 PM »
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

It's weird cause, in this video, no waves can be seen.


Anyways, anyone can look at the moon through a telescope and see that it's not wavy at all.

*

dephelis

  • 479
  • Sine scientia ars nihil est.
Re: WAVES on the moon
« Reply #36 on: May 12, 2014, 02:00:44 AM »
Click on the guy's channel, he has a video of his equipment.  Do you have hours of video footage of the moon?

Hours? Try days/weeks taken over the last four or so years.
Not total time.  How about continuous time?

Yes, and also hours of continuous visual observation of the moon where such an event would be seen.

Re: WAVES on the moon
« Reply #37 on: May 13, 2014, 05:22:08 AM »
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
It's weird cause, in this video, no waves can be seen.
Anyways, anyone can look at the moon through a telescope and see that it's not wavy at all.
You're either blind or an idiot.

Re: WAVES on the moon
« Reply #38 on: May 13, 2014, 05:23:58 AM »
I meant the moon is not as big as we're told.  Work those figures for a 30 mile wide moon.
The guy never at anytime suggested it was the flat earth model of 32 miles.
No shit.  Why would he?  He's not a Flat Earther.   ::)

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42910
Re: WAVES on the moon
« Reply #39 on: May 13, 2014, 06:19:50 AM »
Could it be that those are the legendary gravity waves that scientists have been looking for all of these years?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

Re: WAVES on the moon
« Reply #40 on: May 13, 2014, 06:26:03 AM »
I meant the moon is not as big as we're told.  Work those figures for a 30 mile wide moon.
The guy never at anytime suggested it was the flat earth model of 32 miles.
No shit.  Why would he?  He's not a Flat Earther.   ::)

Because, as we're oft reminded of here, no two FE'er ever agrees on everything?

Re: WAVES on the moon
« Reply #41 on: May 13, 2014, 06:47:40 AM »

Re: WAVES on the moon
« Reply #42 on: May 13, 2014, 06:56:13 AM »

Re: WAVES on the moon
« Reply #43 on: May 14, 2014, 05:36:54 AM »
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
It's weird cause, in this video, no waves can be seen.
Anyways, anyone can look at the moon through a telescope and see that it's not wavy at all.
You're either blind or an idiot.

Ok then show me anywhere in the equipment video, where do you see any waves on the moon (When he shows moon footage).

Or show me a video you made, through a telescope, proving these waves. Or at least a video from a second source.

Or at least honestly tell me that "Yes, I've looked through a telescope and I've seen these waves"
« Last Edit: May 14, 2014, 09:42:41 AM by abaaaabbbb63 »

?

Shmeggley

  • 1909
  • Eppur si muove!
Re: WAVES on the moon
« Reply #44 on: May 14, 2014, 07:13:00 AM »
Giess what? I am a tin foil hat conspiracy lunatic who knows nothing... See what I'm getting at here?