The fuel required to get to the moon & back. Rockets dont run on the smell of an oily rag. & gravity a real hard bitch to break away from .Care to provide the figures? NASA seems to of lost them. Maybe starman would like to supply them. His a NASA junky.
NASA haven't lost them, they're a matter of public record. The Saturn V had about 18km/s of delta v, or (shockingly) about what it takes to get to the moon. These values are all easily derived from known quantities and the F1 engines they used release no more energy than thermodynamics or other rocket engineers would expect. Nothing magical, just ordinary things built really large and really well with a lot of time and money.
Do you really think "The Conspiracy" would have gotten this far if it could be undone by a physics undergrad with a pencil and the back of an envelope?
Or to rephrase that: what is it that's so special about you that you can see through this story without even putting pen to paper, this story that the entire world couldn't figure out with
literally all the expertise there is?
Have you never heard of the conspiracy?
I've heard about it
here, sure, but I thought it was a loose, mutually beneficial arrangement where neither side wanted to let their profitable lie go? But now you're saying that it's an actual singular entity? Whichever of those it was, Russia would still have faked a moon landing. Your reason for them not doing so is that they were getting ready to let the US hang out to dry, which they could have done a much better job at by simply exposing them at any point before. I'm sure this all makes sense to you.