I know Bravimore, it's mad, isn't it? The thermosphere info is easily available on the net as well.
What it all shows is that with just a few hours of internet searches over a couple of evenings you can destroy an entire promotional concept that we all previously accepted.
The problem is, this kind of research is new to me and it amazes me that I hadn't bothered to look before. We all finish work, go home, prepare to eat, eat, and then relax in what ways we can, then go to bed. A little bit of research like this takes effort and the concept that "they are lieing to us" has to be accepted first as well I suppose.
That can be the only reason why I think most others don't know of the complete NASA bullshit.
I'm with you as well on the heliocentric nonsense. That is a ludicrous theory if you take it apart. I have my own theories on what the sun, moon and stars are really (no idea about "planets" and celestial "movement" though), but it will take me a little time to organize the evidence and speculations into something more concrete and understandable. When I mentioned the theory to my wife she looked at me like I was a complete imbecile, but heh
Awesome... sceptimatic the 2nd. You'll fit in around here.
I must say, I laugh at how you FE's have seemingly thrown the baby out with the bathwater. Yes, people and politician lies, yes there are real conspiracies, but that doesn't mean that all of science is based on lies and subterfuge. There is simply no connection there whatsoever and no one on this forum has come close to connecting the (non-existent) dots let alone substantiate anything. Science is what it is because it is repeatable, verifiable and
refutable. We are where we are today in a technological sense because the laws of physics
work and are not in any way based on guesses or baseless assumptions like everything FE's post on this forum.
Calling RE'ers 'indoctrinated' about science is truly nonsensical. Science isn't static; it is constantly evolving. That, in and of itself, says that dogma plays no part in science, nor does subterfuge. Nothing that is put forward as a hypothesis is considered above reproach and will never be blindly accepted. Where in all of this do you come to the conclusion that this is all smoke and mirrors, and someone at sometime decided to conceal the truth about the shape of the earth and the nature of the universe and managed to convince everyone that it was a good idea (for some unknown reason)? Not only that, but to keep this charade going generations into the future..
This, too, is all long before space travel. Why would they even bother with 'space travel' in the first place? Why not simply say space is inaccessible and leave it at that? It would save them faking space rockets, public rocket launches, footage of astronauts experiencing zero-g in orbit, faked moon landings, the endless charade of astronauts whom they need to lie until they die, countless shopped photos/footage and still they have to fudge hours of live footage of the ISS every single day... the list goes on and on.
Yea... I can certainly see that it really is all 'nonsense'.