conspiracy cover up?

Quote from: zork on September 28, 2017, 02:13:17 PM

You are going off the rail again. I talk about math and physics and chemistry and so on. This letter was not about these topics, 100% not. Pythagoras theorem is not about public opinion. Its in place and you don't change it. You may devise some other way in some other context but in euclidean geometry it is in place, its proven and you don't change it. Same with other math theorems and physic laws. They are not topic which was under discussion on this letter.

If you research 9/11 and Apollo your ''math and physics and chemistry and so on''' simply do not behave accordingly in those events.
That is not going off the rail, that is pointing out the gap between scientific facts and events that defy that scientific facts on all accounts.... .

and a new topic that you know nothing about.

-you do not know anything about architecture
-you do not know anything about physics
-you do not know anything about chemistry
-you do not know anything about astronomy
-you do not know anything about aviation
-you do not know anything about engineering
....

and you have proven that with all you post with claims that you are not able to prove.

i am really afraid that you are not able to do that promised experiment because of lake of knowledge to perform a proper experiment with documentation.

Quote from: zork on September 28, 2017, 02:13:17 PM

You are going off the rail again. I talk about math and physics and chemistry and so on. This letter was not about these topics, 100% not. Pythagoras theorem is not about public opinion. Its in place and you don't change it. You may devise some other way in some other context but in euclidean geometry it is in place, its proven and you don't change it. Same with other math theorems and physic laws. They are not topic which was under discussion on this letter.

If you research 9/11 and Apollo your ''math and physics and chemistry and so on''' simply do not behave accordingly in those events.
That is not going off the rail, that is pointing out the gap between scientific facts and events that defy that scientific facts on all accounts.... .

Compare your 'math and physics' with NVIDIA's 'math and physics' from this video:

Quote from: zork on September 28, 2017, 02:13:17 PM

You are going off the rail again. I talk about math and physics and chemistry and so on. This letter was not about these topics, 100% not. Pythagoras theorem is not about public opinion. Its in place and you don't change it. You may devise some other way in some other context but in euclidean geometry it is in place, its proven and you don't change it. Same with other math theorems and physic laws. They are not topic which was under discussion on this letter.

If you research 9/11 and Apollo your ''math and physics and chemistry and so on''' simply do not behave accordingly in those events.
That is not going off the rail, that is pointing out the gap between scientific facts and events that defy that scientific facts on all accounts.... .

There is no 9/11 math and physics and chemistry. There is only speculations what happened afterwards. You can't make correct coclusion afterwards just looking at videos and pictures. And math and physics worked very well on Apollo case. You are still going off rails and off topic also. If you want to show that math/physics/chemistry does not work then can you show some specific math/physics/chemistry laws/equations which are not working and back up that with measurements and data not just "i looked at picture and I don't feel that this physics law works correctly there". And topic was the letter from professors where they definitely didn't address students to question physic/math and others sciences but to question mainstream public views and opinions.