Donk3y, you're about as much of a teacher as my dogs are of being buffalo. You're just a daft kid spouting off, using google to get into conversations.
You have no clue what you are talking about so don't put others down with their thoughts when you don't have the faintest idea.
Even scientists don't actually know if light is a particle or wave. Those at the top will know it's a wave and they do not propagate through a vacuum.
I've already done an experiment to prove that Nixon could not have made a phone call to the moon. I've also proven that the actornauts could not communicate with each other on the moon.
Your light is sound. Everything is sound. It's all vibration and frequency of different wave lengths. No particles, no photons, just propagated sound.
In a true vacuum, no light would travel through it. 100% guaranteed.
Lol as I said before, why would I care what a delusional nobody thinks about me? You're just a random idiot on the internet that has no idea what he's talking about, that has never picked up a science book, but sure talks as though he knows real shit, you know, like the moon being a reflection of the earth xD
Seriously kid, you have no idea whatsoever what you're talking about. Everything I said can be verified. There's a peer reviewed paper for all the claims I've made. I even presented you with a few about the sun's composition, but of course you ignored because, let's be honest, an idiot doesn't read science papers xD Now onto your other idiocies:
"Even scientists don't actually know if light is a particle or wave." - It's both... Light, or rather photons, as with many sub atomic particles such as electrons, have something that's called a wave-particle duality. You remember when you boasted about diffraction yet you didn't know the first thing about it either (in an earlier thread)? Well diffraction is a consequence of light's wave properties. The fact that you're too stupid to understand (more so, you're too stupid to even want to learn) about the particle-wave duality, doesn't mean that "scientists" don't know what it is. There's a very famous experiment that underlines it, it's called the double slit experiment (which I somehow bet you'll deny, because why not? you already denied 90% of science xD):
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
In the first few seconds you can see people that kind of resemble you (a.k.a. idiots) that say that "light is an element" and "light is aura" or "light is brightness" xD
Basically saying that "scientists don't actually know if light is a particle or wave" would be perfectly valid... IN NEWTON'S TIME! 
Here's an animated one with electrons:
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
This one is VERY comprehensible!
"I've already done an experiment to prove that Nixon could not have made a phone call to the moon. I've also proven that the actornauts could not communicate with each other on the moon." - Nice, so where did you submit the paper? Was it peer reviewed? The two most important questions, if not you can just wipe your ass with your "experiment"
"Your light is sound." - WRONG! Sound isn't EM waves. It's also not carried by photons... The less you know, the more bullshit you spout
"It's all vibration and frequency of different wave lengths." - As Martymer would say: "Vibrations of WHAT?" xD Unless you mean the "vibration of wave lengths", which, if you think about it with a bit more KNOWLEDGE on the subject, is a completely idiotic thing to say. Wavelengths don't vibrate, wavelengths are a property of a wave, like the amplitude and frequency. Vibrations are the oscillation of something around a center. Wavelengths don't vibrate (as they are the property of waves) and what could be defined as a vibration of the wave is actually the frequency (the number of times the wave completes a cycle in a unit of time).
"No particles, no photons, just propagated sound." - This is one of the STUPIDEST things one has ever said (of course it doesn't top your main idiocy, about the moon being a reflection of the earth xD). Apart from this claim being flat out retarded, where is your proof? xD
"In a true vacuum, no light would travel through it. 100% guaranteed." - Yea, I'll really take YOUR word for it, because, you know, I'm all okay with trusting a liar who knows nothing about what he's talking about
Here's a hint: some spectrometers rely on the fact that light (as with any EM wave) travels at "c" through vacuum...
Isn't that cool? I mean, in a post where you tried to badmouth me, you actually, not surprizingly, made a fool out of yourself... AGAIN xD It's actually nice, I mean, I don't have to go to the circus to witness somebody make a total fool of themselves xD
*FACEPALM*
You seem a little rattled. Chill out, I'm trying to teach you o think for yourself. Stop with this peer review nonsense.
Peer review works like this.
Scientist: Ok, I've got proof that communication can't be made from Earth to the moon.
Review board: So what you're saying is, the whole moon thing is bogus.
Scientist: Well, yeah, it has to be.
Review board: Your evidence is worthless, we will have you struck off. You are banished from mainstream science, as of now. Any attempt to take this any further and you will be ridiculed.
Peer review only works if it fits what they want it to fit.