No way in hell can that picture be taken of a foot and footprint with that Hasselblad camera chest mount. There's no way to bend the body to that angle and also not a chance it was taken by any other so called Astronaut because the picture is taken directly down the body of the so called Astronaut.
The best angle that the camera could have taken is about 3 feet or so in front of the person, not down to the foot. Just take a look at the camera and also remember that the so called Astronauts couldn't even bend their heads in that suit.
Of course, I'm sure you'll all jump in and say stuff like, " he will have taken the camera off it's chest mount and took it like that."
The truth is, it would be the correct answer, IF it was taken in a studio by someone not wearing a helmet and not in a pressurised suit. It certainly would not have been taken in what we are told is a moon environment in a pressurised suit with pressurised gloves and a camera on a chest mount or even taken off of the chest mount, regardless of no viewfinder and reliant on immediate luck.
It's just another nail in the ever increasing moon landing hot air ruse that deflates it a little bit more as time goes on. Not that it really needs it, because half the world knows it was hoaxed.