Can anyone spot the error?

Have a good look at this picture and have a good think about it, then see if you can spot the error in it. Give me your best thoughts on it and I'll come back to it to see if anyone gets it. If not I'll explain the problem.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/gsfc/4812251745/in/photostream/

Have a good look at this picture and have a good think about it, then see if you can spot the error in it. Give me your best thoughts on it and I'll come back to it to see if anyone gets it. If not I'll explain the problem.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/gsfc/4812251745/in/photostream/

It looks what to be expected. I am sure you will tell us. What is it?

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 15, 2014, 12:06:45 PM

Have a good look at this picture and have a good think about it, then see if you can spot the error in it. Give me your best thoughts on it and I'll come back to it to see if anyone gets it. If not I'll explain the problem.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/gsfc/4812251745/in/photostream/

It looks what to be expected. I am sure you will tell us. What is it?

No starman, it doesn't look what's to be expected, far fom it. Put a bit of effort into it.

Quote from: Starman on April 15, 2014, 12:11:56 PM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 15, 2014, 12:06:45 PM

Have a good look at this picture and have a good think about it, then see if you can spot the error in it. Give me your best thoughts on it and I'll come back to it to see if anyone gets it. If not I'll explain the problem.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/gsfc/4812251745/in/photostream/

It looks what to be expected. I am sure you will tell us. What is it?

No starman, it doesn't look what's to be expected, far fom it. Put a bit of effort into it.

Don't have to because your mind will come up with some ridiculous idea we will have to explain to you and your will still not get it. So save yourself some time and tell my what is your issue.

Here's a big clue.

That photo there has been doctored.  The reflection in his helmet would NOT be that vivid.

Here's a big clue.

Stop playing games. Tell us the error in the first photo.

Oh. Moon-landing denial paranoid delusions again.

How cute.

Oh. Moon-landing denial paranoid delusions again.

How cute.

Coming from scepti all pictures from HIM will be full of conspiracies.

Oh. Moon-landing denial paranoid delusions again.

How cute.

Paranoid delusions my aris. Half the world know they didn't happen but let's not get into that. Let's concentrate on the photo and the camera chest mount. Can you see anything wrong with the OP picture and the second picture I put up? I doubt you can and I'm sure there's an  explanation for when I show you the issue, as you people always do have an explanation for everything, no matter how silly it is.

Quote from: Socratic Amusement on April 15, 2014, 12:42:01 PM

Oh. Moon-landing denial paranoid delusions again.

How cute.

Paranoid delusions my aris. Half the world know they didn't happen but let's not get into that. Let's concentrate on the photo and the camera chest mount. Can you see anything wrong with the OP picture and the second picture I put up? I doubt you can and I'm sure there's an  explanation for when I show you the issue, as you people always do have an explanation for everything, no matter how silly it is.

Are you suggesting that they went to the moon with only one camera?

Quote from: Socratic Amusement on April 15, 2014, 12:42:01 PM

Oh. Moon-landing denial paranoid delusions again.

How cute.

Paranoid delusions my aris. Half the world know they didn't happen but let's not get into that. Let's concentrate on the photo and the camera chest mount. Can you see anything wrong with the OP picture and the second picture I put up? I doubt you can and I'm sure there's an  explanation for when I show you the issue, as you people always do have an explanation for everything, no matter how silly it is.

Scepti, if people constantly prove you wrong, have you ever stopped to think for a minute that it might be you?

Like, we aren't indoctrinated, and there is no conspiracy. You are just flat out wrong. Has that thought ever occurred to you?

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 15, 2014, 12:48:02 PM

Quote from: Socratic Amusement on April 15, 2014, 12:42:01 PM

Oh. Moon-landing denial paranoid delusions again.

How cute.

Paranoid delusions my aris. Half the world know they didn't happen but let's not get into that. Let's concentrate on the photo and the camera chest mount. Can you see anything wrong with the OP picture and the second picture I put up? I doubt you can and I'm sure there's an  explanation for when I show you the issue, as you people always do have an explanation for everything, no matter how silly it is.

Are you suggesting that they went to the moon with only one camera?

No I'm not. What are you trying to say? Spit it out Rotter.

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 15, 2014, 12:48:02 PM

Quote from: Socratic Amusement on April 15, 2014, 12:42:01 PM

Oh. Moon-landing denial paranoid delusions again.

How cute.

Paranoid delusions my aris. Half the world know they didn't happen but let's not get into that. Let's concentrate on the photo and the camera chest mount. Can you see anything wrong with the OP picture and the second picture I put up? I doubt you can and I'm sure there's an  explanation for when I show you the issue, as you people always do have an explanation for everything, no matter how silly it is.

Scepti, if people constantly prove you wrong, have you ever stopped to think for a minute that it might be you?

Like, we aren't indoctrinated, and there is no conspiracy. You are just flat out wrong. Has that thought ever occurred to you?

Of course but seeing as you don't know the answer to what I'm suggesting, then what am I wrong about?
Straight into debunk mode without having a clue what the hell you are debunking. 

I am still waiting for the problem with the photo.

I THINK he's getting at he doesn't believe that the original photo could be taken based on the position of the camera mount in the second. Of course, given the fact that someone else had to take the second photo, disproves the concept that there was only one camera there, and unless you can get your hands on the original negatives showing the sequence of shots from that roll of film, it proves nothing, Let alone the fact that the camera on the body mount could also be hand operational, potentially

I THINK he's getting at he doesn't believe that the original photo could be taken based on the position of the camera mount in the second. Of course, given the fact that someone else had to take the second photo, disproves the concept that there was only one camera there, and unless you can get your hands on the original negatives showing the sequence of shots from that roll of film, it proves nothing, Let alone the fact that the camera on the body mount could also be hand operational, potentially

Maybe he is implying the astronaut could not bend over to take the picture.

Quote from: Socratic Amusement on April 15, 2014, 12:51:02 PM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 15, 2014, 12:48:02 PM

Quote from: Socratic Amusement on April 15, 2014, 12:42:01 PM

Oh. Moon-landing denial paranoid delusions again.

How cute.

Paranoid delusions my aris. Half the world know they didn't happen but let's not get into that. Let's concentrate on the photo and the camera chest mount. Can you see anything wrong with the OP picture and the second picture I put up? I doubt you can and I'm sure there's an  explanation for when I show you the issue, as you people always do have an explanation for everything, no matter how silly it is.

Scepti, if people constantly prove you wrong, have you ever stopped to think for a minute that it might be you?

Like, we aren't indoctrinated, and there is no conspiracy. You are just flat out wrong. Has that thought ever occurred to you?

Of course but seeing as you don't know the answer to what I'm suggesting, then what am I wrong about?
Straight into debunk mode without having a clue what the hell you are debunking. 

I'm not talking about this photo specifically. I just mean all of your easily disproved fantasies related to the moon, Flat Earth, etc.

I haven't even attempted to look for problems with the photo. Because I know you will probably point to something stupid that will take less than four seconds to debunk by anyone with a rational mind, and you will simply put your fingers in your ears and shut your eyes.

And then claim that we are indoctrinated/close minded, and run away.

Just like you always do...

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 15, 2014, 12:53:57 PM

Quote from: Socratic Amusement on April 15, 2014, 12:51:02 PM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 15, 2014, 12:48:02 PM

Quote from: Socratic Amusement on April 15, 2014, 12:42:01 PM

Oh. Moon-landing denial paranoid delusions again.

How cute.

Paranoid delusions my aris. Half the world know they didn't happen but let's not get into that. Let's concentrate on the photo and the camera chest mount. Can you see anything wrong with the OP picture and the second picture I put up? I doubt you can and I'm sure there's an  explanation for when I show you the issue, as you people always do have an explanation for everything, no matter how silly it is.

Scepti, if people constantly prove you wrong, have you ever stopped to think for a minute that it might be you?

Like, we aren't indoctrinated, and there is no conspiracy. You are just flat out wrong. Has that thought ever occurred to you?

Of course but seeing as you don't know the answer to what I'm suggesting, then what am I wrong about?
Straight into debunk mode without having a clue what the hell you are debunking. 

I'm not talking about this photo specifically. I just mean all of your easily disproved fantasies related to the moon, Flat Earth, etc.

I haven't even attempted to look for problems with the photo. Because I know you will probably point to something stupid that will take less than four seconds to debunk by anyone with a rational mind, and you will simply put your fingers in your ears and shut your eyes.

And then claim that we are indoctrinated/close minded, and run away.

Just like you always do...

He may not know they have two types of cameras video and still.

Would be interesting to hear Scepti's thoughts on the Challenger disaster.

Would be interesting to hear Scepti's thoughts on the Challenger disaster.

I am sure he will deny it. That is what he does. DENY everything.

Stop derailing the thread.   

That is true. I am still waiting for scepti to tell me what the problem is the the photo.

It's easy enough to see who took the picture and with what camera NASA catalogue all photos by who took them when and with what camera and what film. Scepti knows this as I have shown him the site many a time when he uses touched up published photos instead of pure originals

Omg it's so obvious!

Look what foot it is, it's a right foot!  Did you see the astronaut in the photo? 2 feet!!  They're such nimwits!

I am still waiting for the problem with the photo.

So am I.

The error is people are responding to a sceptic thread instead of just ignoring him.

The error is people are responding to a sceptic thread instead of just ignoring him.

I would rather make him look stupid. It is fun!!

Quote from: sokarul on April 15, 2014, 06:57:41 PM

The error is people are responding to a sceptic thread instead of just ignoring him.

I would rather make him look stupid. It is fun!!

Hey Starman !
You don't have to do that !
He does a pretty good job - all by himself !

Quote from: Starman on April 15, 2014, 07:12:57 PM

Quote from: sokarul on April 15, 2014, 06:57:41 PM

The error is people are responding to a sceptic thread instead of just ignoring him.

I would rather make him look stupid. It is fun!!

Hey Starman !
You don't have to do that !
He does a pretty good job - all by himself !

He is my computer toy!!