FE explanations for the April 2014 lunar eclipse

  • 139 Replies
  • 27662 Views
Re: FE explanations for the April 2014 lunar eclipse
« Reply #120 on: April 21, 2014, 08:57:18 AM »
#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">THE MOON IS TURNING/ROTATING UPSIDE DOWN POSSIBLE POLE SHIFT COMING?
& if your real good at observing you will know that what is being projected is  Antarctica.
Here is the story:
I guess they don't teach basic science in US schools anymore.
The part of the moon that we see is the part that is lit by sunlight (we just see the moon by the sunlight it reflects).
So as the moon orbits the Earth, the angle the sunlit side makes with us changes (from new moon to full moon and back to new moon).
But no matter where the moon is, the sunlit side is always the side closest to the sun. In winter the sun is farther south in our skies than the rest of the year, so the sunlit side of the moon (which is always the closest part of the moon to the sun) is more towards the "bottom" (south) of the moon.

Note the pictures were taken 8 months apart.
He's not talking about the sunlight on the moon.  He's talking about the dark spots rotating from the right to the left.

?

Starman

  • 3860
  • +0/-0
  • Never miss a day to learn something
Re: FE explanations for the April 2014 lunar eclipse
« Reply #121 on: April 21, 2014, 02:30:37 PM »
#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">THE MOON IS TURNING/ROTATING UPSIDE DOWN POSSIBLE POLE SHIFT COMING?
& if your real good at observing you will know that what is being projected is  Antarctica.
Here is the story:
I guess they don't teach basic science in US schools anymore.
The part of the moon that we see is the part that is lit by sunlight (we just see the moon by the sunlight it reflects).
So as the moon orbits the Earth, the angle the sunlit side makes with us changes (from new moon to full moon and back to new moon).
But no matter where the moon is, the sunlit side is always the side closest to the sun. In winter the sun is farther south in our skies than the rest of the year, so the sunlit side of the moon (which is always the closest part of the moon to the sun) is more towards the "bottom" (south) of the moon.

Note the pictures were taken 8 months apart.
He's not talking about the sunlight on the moon.  He's talking about the dark spots rotating from the right to the left.
The moon is lit by the sun. The light texture will change from different times of the seasons.

?

Starman

  • 3860
  • +0/-0
  • Never miss a day to learn something
Re: FE explanations for the April 2014 lunar eclipse
« Reply #122 on: April 21, 2014, 02:46:58 PM »
#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">THE MOON IS TURNING/ROTATING UPSIDE DOWN POSSIBLE POLE SHIFT COMING?
& if your real good at observing you will know that what is being projected is  Antarctica.
Here is the story:
I guess they don't teach basic science in US schools anymore.
The part of the moon that we see is the part that is lit by sunlight (we just see the moon by the sunlight it reflects).
So as the moon orbits the Earth, the angle the sunlit side makes with us changes (from new moon to full moon and back to new moon).
But no matter where the moon is, the sunlit side is always the side closest to the sun. In winter the sun is farther south in our skies than the rest of the year, so the sunlit side of the moon (which is always the closest part of the moon to the sun) is more towards the "bottom" (south) of the moon.

Note the pictures were taken 8 months apart.
He's not talking about the sunlight on the moon.  He's talking about the dark spots rotating from the right to the left.
If you want to read it here is a detailed explanation of it. http://www.rinkworks.com/rinkforum/view.cgi?post=71668

Re: FE explanations for the April 2014 lunar eclipse
« Reply #123 on: April 21, 2014, 04:34:06 PM »
You're misunderstanding.  He wasn't referring to it looking upside down from two different hemispheres.  He was talking about it looking different from one location...his own home.  For instance, if you did a time lapse of the moon from rise to set, it would appear to rotate.  It's called liberation.  I will see if I can find a video of it.

?

Starman

  • 3860
  • +0/-0
  • Never miss a day to learn something
Re: FE explanations for the April 2014 lunar eclipse
« Reply #124 on: April 21, 2014, 05:29:30 PM »
You're misunderstanding.  He wasn't referring to it looking upside down from two different hemispheres.  He was talking about it looking different from one location...his own home.  For instance, if you did a time lapse of the moon from rise to set, it would appear to rotate.  It's called liberation.  I will see if I can find a video of it.
Where about do you live? Here is a nice video on what you will see. " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
« Last Edit: April 21, 2014, 05:32:20 PM by Starman »

?

Scintific Method

  • 1448
  • +0/-0
  • Trust, but verify.
Re: FE explanations for the April 2014 lunar eclipse
« Reply #125 on: April 21, 2014, 07:07:33 PM »
...if you did a time lapse of the moon from rise to set, it would appear to rotate.

Not if you followed it with a camera mounted on an equatorial mount.

Quote
It's called liberation.  I will see if I can find a video of it.

You mean libration, which looks like this:
Quote from: jtelroy
...the FE'ers still found a way to deny it. Not with counter arguments. Not with proof of any kind. By simply denying it.

"Better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt."

Re: FE explanations for the April 2014 lunar eclipse
« Reply #126 on: April 22, 2014, 04:52:07 AM »
#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">THE MOON IS TURNING/ROTATING UPSIDE DOWN POSSIBLE POLE SHIFT COMING?
& if your real good at observing you will know that what is being projected is  Antarctica.
You sure make a lot of assumptions. It does not look like Antarctica at all. I thought the sun was a reflection.
Who says there assumptions ? invert a photo of the moon & then look at a topography map. I can throw a co2 laser together blind folded. I suppose aurora lights need man intervention as well. to exist  ::)         
When it comes to Jane's standards .I'm lower then an old stove she has in her garage.
Shannon Noll and Natalie Bassingthwaighte - Don't…:

?

Starman

  • 3860
  • +0/-0
  • Never miss a day to learn something
Re: FE explanations for the April 2014 lunar eclipse
« Reply #127 on: April 22, 2014, 05:15:20 AM »
#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">THE MOON IS TURNING/ROTATING UPSIDE DOWN POSSIBLE POLE SHIFT COMING?
& if your real good at observing you will know that what is being projected is  Antarctica.
You sure make a lot of assumptions. It does not look like Antarctica at all. I thought the sun was a reflection.
Who says there assumptions ? invert a photo of the moon & then look at a topography map. I can throw a co2 laser together blind folded. I suppose aurora lights need man intervention as well. to exist  ::)         
The aurora is not a hologram. Tell me how your man made is laser is made in nature? I can tie my shoe blindfolded but it does happen in nature.

Re: FE explanations for the April 2014 lunar eclipse
« Reply #128 on: April 22, 2014, 05:23:13 AM »
#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">THE MOON IS TURNING/ROTATING UPSIDE DOWN POSSIBLE POLE SHIFT COMING?
& if your real good at observing you will know that what is being projected is  Antarctica.
Here is the story:
I guess they don't teach basic science in US schools anymore.
The part of the moon that we see is the part that is lit by sunlight (we just see the moon by the sunlight it reflects).
So as the moon orbits the Earth, the angle the sunlit side makes with us changes (from new moon to full moon and back to new moon).
But no matter where the moon is, the sunlit side is always the side closest to the sun. In winter the sun is farther south in our skies than the rest of the year, so the sunlit side of the moon (which is always the closest part of the moon to the sun) is more towards the "bottom" (south) of the moon.

Note the pictures were taken 8 months apart.
He's not talking about the sunlight on the moon.  He's talking about the dark spots rotating from the right to the left.
No it is as he demonstrated. the face of the moon we see, rotated 135 degrees. viewed from the same location. I have witnessed this happening my self.   
When it comes to Jane's standards .I'm lower then an old stove she has in her garage.
Shannon Noll and Natalie Bassingthwaighte - Don't…:

?

Starman

  • 3860
  • +0/-0
  • Never miss a day to learn something
Re: FE explanations for the April 2014 lunar eclipse
« Reply #129 on: April 22, 2014, 05:26:35 AM »
#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">THE MOON IS TURNING/ROTATING UPSIDE DOWN POSSIBLE POLE SHIFT COMING?
& if your real good at observing you will know that what is being projected is  Antarctica.
Here is the story:
I guess they don't teach basic science in US schools anymore.
The part of the moon that we see is the part that is lit by sunlight (we just see the moon by the sunlight it reflects).
So as the moon orbits the Earth, the angle the sunlit side makes with us changes (from new moon to full moon and back to new moon).
But no matter where the moon is, the sunlit side is always the side closest to the sun. In winter the sun is farther south in our skies than the rest of the year, so the sunlit side of the moon (which is always the closest part of the moon to the sun) is more towards the "bottom" (south) of the moon.

Note the pictures were taken 8 months apart.
He's not talking about the sunlight on the moon.  He's talking about the dark spots rotating from the right to the left.
No it is as he demonstrated. the face of the moon we see, rotated 135 degrees. viewed from the same location. I have witnessed this happening my self.
What were the dates and times you saw this? Where do you live?

Re: FE explanations for the April 2014 lunar eclipse
« Reply #130 on: April 22, 2014, 05:40:32 AM »
#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">THE MOON IS TURNING/ROTATING UPSIDE DOWN POSSIBLE POLE SHIFT COMING?
& if your real good at observing you will know that what is being projected is  Antarctica.
You sure make a lot of assumptions. It does not look like Antarctica at all. I thought the sun was a reflection.
Who says there assumptions ? invert a photo of the moon & then look at a topography map. I can throw a co2 laser together blind folded. I suppose aurora lights need man intervention as well. to exist  ::)         
The aurora is not a hologram. Tell me how your man made is laser is made in nature? I can tie my shoe blindfolded but it does happen in nature.
i didn't say they were a hologram but there produced by natural workings.
laser : energy source, co2, two reflective surfaces one greater then the other & a vacuum.   
« Last Edit: April 22, 2014, 05:42:21 AM by charles bloomington »
When it comes to Jane's standards .I'm lower then an old stove she has in her garage.
Shannon Noll and Natalie Bassingthwaighte - Don't…:

?

Starman

  • 3860
  • +0/-0
  • Never miss a day to learn something
Re: FE explanations for the April 2014 lunar eclipse
« Reply #131 on: April 22, 2014, 05:52:07 AM »
#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">THE MOON IS TURNING/ROTATING UPSIDE DOWN POSSIBLE POLE SHIFT COMING?
& if your real good at observing you will know that what is being projected is  Antarctica.
You sure make a lot of assumptions. It does not look like Antarctica at all. I thought the sun was a reflection.
Who says there assumptions ? invert a photo of the moon & then look at a topography map. I can throw a co2 laser together blind folded. I suppose aurora lights need man intervention as well. to exist  ::)         
The aurora is not a hologram. Tell me how your man made is laser is made in nature? I can tie my shoe blindfolded but it does happen in nature.
i didn't say they were a hologram but there produced by natural workings.
laser : energy source, co2, two reflective surfaces one greater then the other & a vacuum.
Show me and example of a laser in nature. It is easy to say I can build one blindfolded but I dough you really can. What energy source in nature would it be used?

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: FE explanations for the April 2014 lunar eclipse
« Reply #132 on: April 22, 2014, 06:08:41 AM »

The aurora is not a hologram. Tell me how your man made is laser is made in nature? I can tie my shoe blindfolded but it does happen in nature.
You were saying.  ;)

#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">dynamo magician

?

Starman

  • 3860
  • +0/-0
  • Never miss a day to learn something
Re: FE explanations for the April 2014 lunar eclipse
« Reply #133 on: April 22, 2014, 08:06:21 AM »

The aurora is not a hologram. Tell me how your man made is laser is made in nature? I can tie my shoe blindfolded but it does happen in nature.
You were saying.  ;)

#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">dynamo magician
You were saying.
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: FE explanations for the April 2014 lunar eclipse
« Reply #134 on: April 22, 2014, 08:16:33 AM »

The aurora is not a hologram. Tell me how your man made is laser is made in nature? I can tie my shoe blindfolded but it does happen in nature.
You were saying.  ;)

#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">dynamo magician
You were saying.
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">


Thanks a lot for screwing that up for the rest of us.  You could have at least put a spoiler alert on that, d*ck. 

?

Starman

  • 3860
  • +0/-0
  • Never miss a day to learn something
Re: FE explanations for the April 2014 lunar eclipse
« Reply #135 on: April 22, 2014, 08:20:12 AM »
I am still waiting how a co2 laser exist in nature.

Re: FE explanations for the April 2014 lunar eclipse
« Reply #136 on: April 22, 2014, 09:12:07 AM »
Once again, I'm not talking about the light!  I'm talking about it rotating (the dark spots moving).
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

Re: FE explanations for the April 2014 lunar eclipse
« Reply #137 on: April 23, 2014, 02:39:39 AM »
I am still waiting how a co2 laser exist in nature.
He was wearing shorts not long pants.
Next sun rise.   
When it comes to Jane's standards .I'm lower then an old stove she has in her garage.
Shannon Noll and Natalie Bassingthwaighte - Don't…:

?

Jer9999

  • 805
  • +0/-0
Re: FE explanations for the April 2014 lunar eclipse
« Reply #138 on: April 23, 2014, 05:48:01 PM »
"We know lunar eclipses have also occurred where the sun and moon are both visible at the same time."

hahahahaha  thanks for the laugh! Please I hope for the sake of all humanity he is joking. Please be trolling. Please!


You haven't done your homework at all.

But I have.



From America, Christopher Columbus also wrote to the king and the queen of Spain about the simultaneous eclipses:

This that I have said is what I have heard. What I know is that the year 94 I sailed in 24 degrees to the west in 9 hours, and it could not be mistake because there were eclipses: the sun was in Libra and the moon in Ariete.

http://www.mgar.net/docs/colon4.htm

Esto que yo he dicho es lo que he oído. Lo que yo sé es que el ańo de 94 navegué en 24° al Poniente en término de nueve horas, y no pudo haber yerro porque hubo eclipses: el sol estaba en Libra y la luna en Ariete.

From Columbus words is clear that double eclipses were also known to the king and to the queen.

Yes in a selenelion eclipse this can happen, but the Earth is still in between the Sun and the Moon, just on an angle, not the moon next to the Sun overhead, or in any random position with just some darkening of the moon happening for no reason. You can research how and why the selenelion eclipse occurs and find your answer instead of you don't understand it therefore it is a gov't conspiracy.

?

Jer9999

  • 805
  • +0/-0
Re: FE explanations for the April 2014 lunar eclipse
« Reply #139 on: April 23, 2014, 05:53:30 PM »
What makes you so sure the orbit is planar and not the Earth?

EarthIsASpaceship: Could you elaborate on your question? I'm having trouble envisioning what you described; a diagram could help.
I mean, there is no concrete proof it's the Earth spinning and not the sky.  There is no concrete proof the planets are on a plane and not us! A magician can make a rabbit APPEAR to come out of an empty hat but I don't have to believe it. " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

Yes there is: The Faucault Pendulum proves the Earth is rotating. Great night last week. I was Able to view the pendulum, look at the eclipse through a massive telescope, then later go back to the pendulum and see how far it rotated.