earth from outer space

Carma is a bitch!

Carma is a bitch!

That would be karma.

The Death Star looked pretty realistic as well

It did?!?  You must have been on some serious drugs back then.

Notice that, despite all of the other continents being represented, Antarctica is not.  Suspicious?

Also, the Earth on their logo looks a lot like the FE map.  Coincidence?

There is nothing suspicious about the UN logo. It is simply that - a logo. And the only coincidence is that is simply a stylized version of the Unipolar Projection of the globe. Nothing suspicious about the Ice Ring not being shown Again the UN logo is just a simplified stylized logo. It looks neater without the Ice Ring. Besides some FE's say there is no FE Map. The Unipolar Projection Map has been around quite some time.

Quote from: tappet on April 05, 2014, 02:16:19 PM

The helicopter is for entertainment only as I know you guys love toy models.

But not nearly as much as you flat earthers love claiming that every picture of every shuttle and every satellite is bogus LOL.

You have absolutely no viable evidence to support any of these "model" claims of course, but that doesn't stop you repeating them ad nauseam does it?

It also amuses me endlessly that you seriously expect us round earthers to accept absolutely your obviously doctored images of the beach and straight edge you've posted here numerous times, but at the same time dismiss all round earthers' photos as fakes.

It'd be pathetic were it not so funny.  But then I guess this sort of irony is lost on people like you tappet?

There is a review of a rather bad book on another website , which different reviewers called it "pathetic" and another one called it "so stupid it's funny." Sometimes I think that applies to this website. LOL.

Still another reviewer called the book "the worst book ever commercially published." No comment on that, but I sometimes wonder about this website.LOL.

Quote from: jroa on March 25, 2014, 04:58:21 AM

Notice that, despite all of the other continents being represented, Antarctica is not.  Suspicious?

Also, the Earth on their logo looks a lot like the FE map.  Coincidence?

There is nothing suspicious about the UN logo. It is simply that - a logo. And the only coincidence is that is simply a stylized version of the Unipolar Projection of the globe. Nothing suspicious about the Ice Ring not being shown Again the UN logo is just a simplified stylized logo. It looks neater without the Ice Ring. Besides some FE's say there is no FE Map. The Unipolar Projection Map has been around quite some time.

Antarctica is a continent, not just a ring of ice. 

Quote from: ausGeoff on April 05, 2014, 02:32:38 PM

Quote from: tappet on April 05, 2014, 02:16:19 PM

The helicopter is for entertainment only as I know you guys love toy models.

But not nearly as much as you flat earthers love claiming that every picture of every shuttle and every satellite is bogus LOL.

You have absolutely no viable evidence to support any of these "model" claims of course, but that doesn't stop you repeating them ad nauseam does it?

It also amuses me endlessly that you seriously expect us round earthers to accept absolutely your obviously doctored images of the beach and straight edge you've posted here numerous times, but at the same time dismiss all round earthers' photos as fakes.

It'd be pathetic were it not so funny.  But then I guess this sort of irony is lost on people like you tappet?

There is a review of a rather bad book on another website , which different reviewers called it "pathetic" and another one called it "so stupid it's funny." Sometimes I think that applies to this website. LOL.

Still another reviewer called the book "the worst book ever commercially published." No comment on that, but I sometimes wonder about this website.LOL.

Yeh  I get it. You think I am stupid and pathetic so phukin what. Now how about you explain the 3mm wire on your toy shuttle.
And maybe you and your buddy can explain how I obviously doctored my photos.
That would be something I would really enjoy reading.

this debate is going to nowhere,i hope you all realize that.it is transforming in a complete waste of time for all sides,especially for the side that is in the middle of the round and flat eartheres : which is exactly the theme of this topic that most of you avoid or seems you have forgotten.
my personal opinion is that the debate is immature and as i started..it leads to nothing constructive.
come on!and lets join together to do this!hmm?

so far we have some really nice pictures but the ones with earth from outer space from whatever angle(from a sufficient distance to see the whole rim of the alleged globe/disc*) still lacks the details to make them credible beyond doubt.
*though keep in mid that the debate is not about the roundness or flatness of Earth,this is more as a guideline,a base for what are we here to find out through the means of photographic media,in motion or not.

to eliminate a possible question : we are here to find out why there are so few pictures and videos(that are lacking credibility as a whole,not the ones that are composite,ok?)with earth from outer space especially with all the technology and deep space missions after the year 2000.

Antarctica is a continent, not just a ring of ice.

So all the maps we have (and use) of Antarctica  are completely and utterly wrong?

this debate is going to nowhere,i hope you all realize that.it is transforming in a complete waste of time for all sides,especially for the side that is in the middle of the round and flat eartheres : which is exactly the theme of this topic that most of you avoid or seems you have forgotten.
my personal opinion is that the debate is immature and as i started..it leads to nothing constructive.
come on!and lets join together to do this!hmm?

so far we have some really nice pictures but the ones with earth from outer space from whatever angle(from a sufficient distance to see the whole rim of the alleged globe/disc*) still lacks the details to make them credible beyond doubt.
*though keep in mid that the debate is not about the roundness or flatness of Earth,this is more as a guideline,a base for what are we here to find out through the means of photographic media,in motion or not.

to eliminate a possible question : we are here to find out why there are so few pictures and videos(that are lacking credibility as a whole,not the ones that are composite,ok?)with earth from outer space especially with all the technology and deep space missions after the year 2000.

How many pictures would you like and what would make them credible to you?  There may be many, but not published.

Quote from: djuptsjomaour on April 06, 2014, 03:03:08 AM

this debate is going to nowhere,i hope you all realize that.it is transforming in a complete waste of time for all sides,especially for the side that is in the middle of the round and flat eartheres : which is exactly the theme of this topic that most of you avoid or seems you have forgotten.
my personal opinion is that the debate is immature and as i started..it leads to nothing constructive.
come on!and lets join together to do this!hmm?

so far we have some really nice pictures but the ones with earth from outer space from whatever angle(from a sufficient distance to see the whole rim of the alleged globe/disc*) still lacks the details to make them credible beyond doubt.
*though keep in mid that the debate is not about the roundness or flatness of Earth,this is more as a guideline,a base for what are we here to find out through the means of photographic media,in motion or not.

to eliminate a possible question : we are here to find out why there are so few pictures and videos(that are lacking credibility as a whole,not the ones that are composite,ok?)with earth from outer space especially with all the technology and deep space missions after the year 2000.

How many pictures would you like and what would make them credible to you?  There may be many, but not published.

the most credible of them all should be something like this trip upwards,getting further away than just a simple horizon " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">  of course without the logo going on ,real / not CGI and in a real time footage if possible.or at least a photograph similar in clarity  if not even better than this http://yuq.me/users/16/937/QkRL0tJMZD.png.
sorry but this is the best i could find that can relate to the idea.

Quote from: inquisitive on April 06, 2014, 03:24:44 AM

Quote from: djuptsjomaour on April 06, 2014, 03:03:08 AM

this debate is going to nowhere,i hope you all realize that.it is transforming in a complete waste of time for all sides,especially for the side that is in the middle of the round and flat eartheres : which is exactly the theme of this topic that most of you avoid or seems you have forgotten.
my personal opinion is that the debate is immature and as i started..it leads to nothing constructive.
come on!and lets join together to do this!hmm?

so far we have some really nice pictures but the ones with earth from outer space from whatever angle(from a sufficient distance to see the whole rim of the alleged globe/disc*) still lacks the details to make them credible beyond doubt.
*though keep in mid that the debate is not about the roundness or flatness of Earth,this is more as a guideline,a base for what are we here to find out through the means of photographic media,in motion or not.

to eliminate a possible question : we are here to find out why there are so few pictures and videos(that are lacking credibility as a whole,not the ones that are composite,ok?)with earth from outer space especially with all the technology and deep space missions after the year 2000.

How many pictures would you like and what would make them credible to you?  There may be many, but not published.

the most credible of them all should be something like this trip upwards,getting further away than just a simple horizon " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">  of course without the logo going on ,real / not CGI and in a real time footage if possible.or at least a photograph similar in clarity  if not even better than this http://yuq.me/users/16/937/QkRL0tJMZD.png.
sorry but this is the best i could find that can relate to the idea.

see dvidshub.net

Quote from: inquisitive on April 06, 2014, 03:24:44 AM

Quote from: djuptsjomaour on April 06, 2014, 03:03:08 AM

this debate is going to nowhere,i hope you all realize that.it is transforming in a complete waste of time for all sides,especially for the side that is in the middle of the round and flat eartheres : which is exactly the theme of this topic that most of you avoid or seems you have forgotten.
my personal opinion is that the debate is immature and as i started..it leads to nothing constructive.
come on!and lets join together to do this!hmm?

so far we have some really nice pictures but the ones with earth from outer space from whatever angle(from a sufficient distance to see the whole rim of the alleged globe/disc*) still lacks the details to make them credible beyond doubt.
*though keep in mid that the debate is not about the roundness or flatness of Earth,this is more as a guideline,a base for what are we here to find out through the means of photographic media,in motion or not.

to eliminate a possible question : we are here to find out why there are so few pictures and videos(that are lacking credibility as a whole,not the ones that are composite,ok?)with earth from outer space especially with all the technology and deep space missions after the year 2000.

How many pictures would you like and what would make them credible to you?  There may be many, but not published.

the most credible of them all should be something like this trip upwards,getting further away than just a simple horizon " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">  of course without the logo going on ,real / not CGI and in a real time footage if possible.or at least a photograph similar in clarity  if not even better than this http://yuq.me/users/16/937/QkRL0tJMZD.png.
sorry but this is the best i could find that can relate to the idea.

I am always find it funny when someone orders a video or picture to please their imagination. Space is not like traveling to the grand canyon to take special pictures. You have to accept what is there or forget it.

I am always find it funny when someone orders a video or picture to please their imagination. Space is not like traveling to the grand canyon to take special pictures. You have to accept what is there or forget it.

now...was this comment a contribution to the discussion?
if so...is my imagination that the Earth is round or flat?
and...it is the most easy way to accept what is "there",but that does implies is the answer?
each and everyone has his/hers own opinion.
i am not pleased..i am not so easygoing...sorry starman

Quote from: Starman on April 06, 2014, 04:29:48 AM

I am always find it funny when someone orders a video or picture to please their imagination. Space is not like traveling to the grand canyon to take special pictures. You have to accept what is there or forget it.

now...was this comment a contribution to the discussion?
if so...is my imagination that the Earth is round or flat?
and...it is the most easy way to accept what is "there",but that does implies is the answer?
each and everyone has his/hers own opinion.
i am not pleased..i am not so easygoing...sorry starman

The posted picture are really good. I am no sure what are you asking for.

Quote from: djuptsjomaour on April 06, 2014, 04:51:17 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 06, 2014, 04:29:48 AM

I am always find it funny when someone orders a video or picture to please their imagination. Space is not like traveling to the grand canyon to take special pictures. You have to accept what is there or forget it.

now...was this comment a contribution to the discussion?
if so...is my imagination that the Earth is round or flat?
and...it is the most easy way to accept what is "there",but that does implies is the answer?
each and everyone has his/hers own opinion.
i am not pleased..i am not so easygoing...sorry starman

The posted picture are really good. I am no sure what are you asking for.

? the most credible of them all should be something like this trip upwards,getting further away than just a simple horizon " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">  of course without the logo going on ,real / not CGI and in a real time footage if possible.or at least a photograph similar in clarity  if not even better than this http://yuq.me/users/16/937/QkRL0tJMZD.png. ?

Quote from: Starman on April 06, 2014, 05:51:42 AM

Quote from: djuptsjomaour on April 06, 2014, 04:51:17 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 06, 2014, 04:29:48 AM

I am always find it funny when someone orders a video or picture to please their imagination. Space is not like traveling to the grand canyon to take special pictures. You have to accept what is there or forget it.

now...was this comment a contribution to the discussion?
if so...is my imagination that the Earth is round or flat?
and...it is the most easy way to accept what is "there",but that does implies is the answer?
each and everyone has his/hers own opinion.
i am not pleased..i am not so easygoing...sorry starman

The posted picture are really good. I am no sure what are you asking for.

? the most credible of them all should be something like this trip upwards,getting further away than just a simple horizon " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">  of course without the logo going on ,real / not CGI and in a real time footage if possible.or at least a photograph similar in clarity  if not even better than this http://yuq.me/users/16/937/QkRL0tJMZD.png. ?

I have seen a few like that but it is taken from wide angle. I dough you will find the one without wide angle. I will look for some. The last link you posted does not work.

Take a look at this one. Start the time at 2:35.
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

Both sides of this need to learn how to link stuff.

Don't know what went wrong with the last one. Let me try this one:
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

Quote from: djuptsjomaour on April 06, 2014, 06:40:37 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 06, 2014, 05:51:42 AM

Quote from: djuptsjomaour on April 06, 2014, 04:51:17 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 06, 2014, 04:29:48 AM

I am always find it funny when someone orders a video or picture to please their imagination. Space is not like traveling to the grand canyon to take special pictures. You have to accept what is there or forget it.

now...was this comment a contribution to the discussion?
if so...is my imagination that the Earth is round or flat?
and...it is the most easy way to accept what is "there",but that does implies is the answer?
each and everyone has his/hers own opinion.
i am not pleased..i am not so easygoing...sorry starman

The posted picture are really good. I am no sure what are you asking for.

? the most credible of them all should be something like this trip upwards,getting further away than just a simple horizon " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">  of course without the logo going on ,real / not CGI and in a real time footage if possible.or at least a photograph similar in clarity  if not even better than this http://yuq.me/users/16/937/QkRL0tJMZD.png. ?

I have seen a few like that but it is taken from wide angle. I dough you will find the one without wide angle. I will look for some. The last link you posted does not work.

oh..the last one is just a still picture with the samevideo.it it the idea of it,some stellar background and the whole Earth

Quote from: Starman on April 06, 2014, 06:44:18 AM

Quote from: djuptsjomaour on April 06, 2014, 06:40:37 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 06, 2014, 05:51:42 AM

Quote from: djuptsjomaour on April 06, 2014, 04:51:17 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 06, 2014, 04:29:48 AM

I am always find it funny when someone orders a video or picture to please their imagination. Space is not like traveling to the grand canyon to take special pictures. You have to accept what is there or forget it.

now...was this comment a contribution to the discussion?
if so...is my imagination that the Earth is round or flat?
and...it is the most easy way to accept what is "there",but that does implies is the answer?
each and everyone has his/hers own opinion.
i am not pleased..i am not so easygoing...sorry starman

The posted picture are really good. I am no sure what are you asking for.

? the most credible of them all should be something like this trip upwards,getting further away than just a simple horizon " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">  of course without the logo going on ,real / not CGI and in a real time footage if possible.or at least a photograph similar in clarity  if not even better than this http://yuq.me/users/16/937/QkRL0tJMZD.png. ?

I have seen a few like that but it is taken from wide angle. I dough you will find the one without wide angle. I will look for some. The last link you posted does not work.

oh..the last one is just a still picture with the samevideo.it it the idea of it,some stellar background and the whole Earth

The last one came with 404 error.

Both sides of this need to learn how to link stuff.

true..
though keep in mind that i am not so well versed in computerology 
i will try better next time and take some reinsurance that they work properly.

I use the preview to confirm if it works.

Don't know what went wrong with the last one. Let me try this one:
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

I think i prefer this one: " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

Don't know what went wrong with the last one. Let me try this one:
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

wow starman!this one is just great!!that is the thing i am referring at just(and please don't take it as aggressive or personal)is half of the trip i am expecting to.what i mean is that will be a great asset for all to observe that horizon,depicting in the video you have posted,going into a circular contour showing a globular planet indeed.
this one is the closest thing yet!nice!

Quote from: Starman on April 06, 2014, 07:26:57 AM

Don't know what went wrong with the last one. Let me try this one:
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

I think i prefer this one: " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

Any particular reason why the camera never shakes or the reason for water on the camera lens, or the noise the bootsers are making in a near vacuum. Any answers would be appreciated.

Quote from: Starman on April 06, 2014, 07:26:57 AM

Don't know what went wrong with the last one. Let me try this one:
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

wow starman!this one is just great!!that is the thing i am referring at just(and please don't take it as aggressive or personal)is half of the trip i am expecting to.what i mean is that will be a great asset for all to observe that horizon,depicting in the video you have posted,going into a circular contour showing a globular planet indeed.
this one is the closest thing yet!nice!

What? You mean the one where the ocean waves just go into suspended animation?

Quote from: RandomREalist on April 06, 2014, 07:50:20 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 06, 2014, 07:26:57 AM

Don't know what went wrong with the last one. Let me try this one:
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

I think i prefer this one: " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

Any particular reason why the camera never shakes or the reason for water on the camera lens, or the noise the bootsers are making in a near vacuum. Any answers would be appreciated.

The camera is attached to a frame of the rocket that is very massive and heavy. The sounds can be heard by SMALL vibrations on the frame. You should be smart enough to figure that out. You just want to find things are look fake.

Quote from: Starman on April 06, 2014, 07:26:57 AM

Don't know what went wrong with the last one. Let me try this one:
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

I think i prefer this one: " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

while the one starman posted is nice this one is even better considering that from the minute 12:46 to 12:49 we can see two horizons,one under and other above in a way,but still not complete.it seams a breakthrough is approaching!this is the way!
thank you!