It is no more than the religion of this Age and it has shown itself as such a thousand times.
Whilst this statement sounds very deep and meaningful, I disagree totally with it.
The tenets of science are nothing like religious dogma. Scientific rationalism is based solely on empirical evidence. Religion is based solely on faith, and faith is defined as "belief without proof". And science has
nothing to do with morality
per se. That's for the philosophers and bioethicists to decide upon.
I also disagree with your allegation that science has reduced the "value of living" in a thousand ways. Please give us some examples, instead of empty rhetoric. Or would you prefer to be living in the Middle Ages, riding on a horse and cart, reading by candlelight, drinking from the village well, and with your every thought and action being controlled by the church? You know; before the age of contemporary science?
A hundred years ago, appendicitis, diabetes, emphysema, smallpox, mitral stenosis etc were all automatic premature death sentences.
Now—thanks to science—we have surgery, insulin pumps, lung transplants, antibiotics, and plastic heart valves, all thanks to the efforts of scientists.