At sceptimatic's request...

  • 678 Replies
  • 129153 Views
*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #450 on: February 27, 2014, 02:12:05 AM »


Sorry bud, now I think your making shit up.
Think what you like, it's all there for you to look up. I'm sure the N.A.S.A folks will be along soon to confirm it's real.

?

tappet

  • 2162
  • +0/-0
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #451 on: February 27, 2014, 02:17:43 AM »
I just looked it up myself.
Your not shitting me.
WTF....................

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #452 on: February 27, 2014, 02:32:52 AM »
I just looked it up myself.
Your not shitting me.
WTF....................
And these people think it shouldn't be questioned. Can you seriously believe that human beings can believe all this stuff after seeing the evidence?

*

JimmyTheCrab

  • 10340
  • +0/-5
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #453 on: February 27, 2014, 02:39:10 AM »
So, you are reduced to "oh it looks a bit crap and could never land on the moon, even though I have absolutely no engineering knowledgt whatsoever" ?

I mean, can you find a single engineer to support your position? 

what is your problem with this design:



and here is a test version in action (notice without the foil covering how complicated it is).  You reckon you could build one of these from "cardboard and glue"??

Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.

?

tappet

  • 2162
  • +0/-0
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #454 on: February 27, 2014, 02:56:09 AM »
So what is the foil for?

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #455 on: February 27, 2014, 03:09:51 AM »
So, you are reduced to "oh it looks a bit crap and could never land on the moon, even though I have absolutely no engineering knowledgt whatsoever" ?

I mean, can you find a single engineer to support your position? 

what is your problem with this design:



and here is a test version in action (notice without the foil covering how complicated it is).  You reckon you could build one of these from "cardboard and glue"??


Yes, it's a lovely little design. I think I'll rig up a moon lander and show you my design and tell you I landed it on the moon.
Come on man, are you being serious?
Take a real good look at the piece of crap paper and cardboard effigy they say they sent up, full of tin foil. It shocks me that grown up people swallow this.

They made diagrams of rocket ships that could go to distant planets with everything on them that would be needed for the long trips, they say. Like little cities in a ship. Are they real?
Stop being so naive.

?

Scintific Method

  • 1448
  • +0/-0
  • Trust, but verify.
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #456 on: February 27, 2014, 03:27:51 AM »
It shocks me that grown up people swallow this.

It used to shock me that a person capable of putting together a (fairly) complete sentence could be so willfully ignorant, but I've gotten used to it now.

Seriously though, learn something about physics and engineering, do it all yourself through experimentation if you have to, but just do it and stop criticising all this stuff simply because you don't understand it.
Quote from: jtelroy
...the FE'ers still found a way to deny it. Not with counter arguments. Not with proof of any kind. By simply denying it.

"Better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt."

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #457 on: February 27, 2014, 03:45:39 AM »
It shocks me that grown up people swallow this.

It used to shock me that a person capable of putting together a (fairly) complete sentence could be so willfully ignorant, but I've gotten used to it now.

Seriously though, learn something about physics and engineering, do it all yourself through experimentation if you have to, but just do it and stop criticising all this stuff simply because you don't understand it.
And this is from? A scientist? or a scintific one?

Don't come all that clap trap with me, sonny. You're just like me and everyone else on a forum, only you pretend you know it all and what's really going on, when in truth, you have no clue.
I can't help the fact that you are naive. It's not my problem, it's yours...but you can avoid being naive by looking at stuff in realistic terms instead of the fantasy terms that N.A.S.A (for instance) drill into your skull.
Even some kids can see that the moon landing stuff is complete garbage; not because they have no scientific background, it's because they see the ridiculousness for what it is with just a few of the silly cardboard effigies that are purported to have navigated space and the moon.
You! As well as others, simply hang onto what you have always believed and you won't use your own common sense to allow you to see it for what it all is... and was.

When things look legitimate, they are hard to pick apart. They are hard, because they are what they are and look to be what was told.
This space stuff has hundreds and hundreds of questions about it all from start to finish. It doesn't matter whether people go into debunk mode; it's a matter of, it's full of holes and needs to be questioned.
Weak minded people like yourself will simply follow protocol and your peers, because it's easier to do that, than to actually expend time looking at reality and going against the grain.

One day you may see it all for what it is. Maybe!

?

Scintific Method

  • 1448
  • +0/-0
  • Trust, but verify.
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #458 on: February 27, 2014, 03:51:14 AM »
I suppose this could never fly then?


I mean, it's just some rickety wood and fabric thing made in the very early 1900's.
Quote from: jtelroy
...the FE'ers still found a way to deny it. Not with counter arguments. Not with proof of any kind. By simply denying it.

"Better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt."

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #459 on: February 27, 2014, 04:01:14 AM »
I suppose this could never fly then?


I mean, it's just some rickety wood and fabric thing made in the very early 1900's.
What a weak come back.

?

SirSpankalot

  • 601
  • +0/-0
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #460 on: February 27, 2014, 04:15:32 AM »

If you understood how your camera processes light and turns that into a format to be readable by your computer, you'd say your own photos were doctored too.

It's becoming pretty obvious that not many flat earthers have much idea about the technicalities of photography or its mechanisms and processes.

Their confusion about the effects of wide-angle lenses on image distortion is a good example.
If only we were experts in EVERYTHING known to man like you round earthers, eh?
Ah well, you can't have everything I suppose.

I think I'll spend the next 500 years of my life reading up on absolutely everything so I can converse better with all you round earthers.  ;D

We don't know all that much, what we do know is how to find out what the answer is...

The reason you think that we think that we know everything is, that you know so little.  You're starting from a very low starting place.

?

SirSpankalot

  • 601
  • +0/-0
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #461 on: February 27, 2014, 04:18:18 AM »
I just looked it up myself.
Your not shitting me.
WTF....................

How can you NOT know this? Have you been living under a rock?

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #462 on: February 27, 2014, 04:20:27 AM »

If you understood how your camera processes light and turns that into a format to be readable by your computer, you'd say your own photos were doctored too.

It's becoming pretty obvious that not many flat earthers have much idea about the technicalities of photography or its mechanisms and processes.

Their confusion about the effects of wide-angle lenses on image distortion is a good example.
If only we were experts in EVERYTHING known to man like you round earthers, eh?
Ah well, you can't have everything I suppose.

I think I'll spend the next 500 years of my life reading up on absolutely everything so I can converse better with all you round earthers.  ;D

We don't know all that much, what we do know is how to find out what the answer is...

The reason you think that we think that we know everything is, that you know so little.  You're starting from a very low starting place.
Are your eyes better now? Stopped stinging?

In your mind I know very little and in the minds of your little friends and that's great.
What you actually know, is nothing.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2014, 04:23:53 AM by sceptimatic »

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #463 on: February 27, 2014, 04:23:21 AM »
I just looked it up myself.
Your not shitting me.
WTF....................

How can you NOT know this? Have you been living under a rock?
Not everyone studies the moon landing bullcrap you know. Most people are busy doing other stuff and at best, take fleeting glances at snippets of info, which is not enough to give anyone any insight into the full on clap trap that it was and still is.

It's not a 10 minute job. It has to be thoroughly looked over from both sides and then the realism hits, that it was all a big hoax.

?

SirSpankalot

  • 601
  • +0/-0
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #464 on: February 27, 2014, 04:27:25 AM »
So what is the foil for?

OK, I am staggered you don't know this. But anyway... here goes..

The LM, or LEM, was only designed to be flown from lunar orbit to landing, take off back to the command module which orbited the moon while the LM was on the ground.

It did not need the external structural strength that a craft would need in the earths atmosphere.  The internal skin was strong to maintain a positive pressure inside the craft, its external skin did not need so much strength.

The foil was to protect the craft from the extreme heat and cold in space.. the temps up there went from -250 deg f to + 250 deg f.

So the foil was pretty much a Mylar foil (from memory) and about 20 layers of it.. It acted as an outstanding protective layer and insulator.

The LM looked very strange.. remember it it was flying in zero gravity.. it didn't need to be aerodynamic - it just needed to provide a life support system, a cargo system, a landing system and a launch system.. it had to be as light as possible so that they could minimise fuel...

If you look at the command module, which is what they re-entered the atmosphere in. .that was MUCH sturdy.

?

SirSpankalot

  • 601
  • +0/-0
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #465 on: February 27, 2014, 04:32:24 AM »
I just looked it up myself.
Your not shitting me.
WTF....................

How can you NOT know this? Have you been living under a rock?
Not everyone studies the moon landing bullcrap you know. Most people are busy doing other stuff and at best, take fleeting glances at snippets of info, which is not enough to give anyone any insight into the full on clap trap that it was and still is.

It's not a 10 minute job. It has to be thoroughly looked over from both sides and then the realism hits, that it was all a big hoax.

To most educated, well rounded adults that aren't ignorant morons like you. it's common knowledge.  Given its one of the most significant events in our history.

Sure there are people that are blind to it, but there also the sort of people that sleep all day, smoke dope, take welfare and generally waste the air we breath. much like you.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #466 on: February 27, 2014, 04:42:48 AM »
I just looked it up myself.
Your not shitting me.
WTF....................

How can you NOT know this? Have you been living under a rock?
Not everyone studies the moon landing bullcrap you know. Most people are busy doing other stuff and at best, take fleeting glances at snippets of info, which is not enough to give anyone any insight into the full on clap trap that it was and still is.

It's not a 10 minute job. It has to be thoroughly looked over from both sides and then the realism hits, that it was all a big hoax.

To most educated, well rounded adults that aren't ignorant morons like you. it's common knowledge.  Given its one of the most significant events in our history.

Sure there are people that are blind to it, but there also the sort of people that sleep all day, smoke dope, take welfare and generally waste the air we breath. much like you.
Well, we can't all be the same, can we?

*

JimmyTheCrab

  • 10340
  • +0/-5
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #467 on: February 27, 2014, 04:43:24 AM »
So what is the foil for?
To wrap round your head and stop Them from controlling your mind with their evil rays.


Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #468 on: February 27, 2014, 04:50:32 AM »
So what is the foil for?
Do you know what convection is? ever seen medical crews putting "tin foil" blankets around people? Feel like doing some research? I will give you some key words to start you off: convection, mylar blanket, thermal radiation. Then when you have read up on that have a look at your pictures. Have a good look and see if you can think what the "tin foil" might be used for. Some more key words: moon, temperature, variations..
Space is neither hot or cold as we are told, so therefore we can only assume that the body heat of the actornauts will heat up inside the craft and is insulted in a vacuum, so no escape from the build up of heat, not to mention all the electronics running.
If it's to stop the sun heating it up, well, turkeys don't fare too well in ovens when foil covered.
Anyone for baked actornauts? Leg or breast?

*

glokta

  • 598
  • +0/-0
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #469 on: February 27, 2014, 04:53:04 AM »
Quote from: sceptimatic
Not everyone studies the moon
landing bullcrap you know. Most
people are busy doing other stuff and
at best, take fleeting glances at
snippets of info, which is not enough
to give anyone any insight
At last! This is the only thing you have said so far that makes any sense! Does this explain why you are taken in by photos showing the wrong side of the lem, well known photoshopped fakes etc? It is fine for you to admit that you don't really know much about the subject and have only taking a passing interest in it. It would explain why you have unravelled so spectacularly over the last 20 odd pages.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2014, 04:57:28 AM by glokta »
Quote from: sceptimatic
Use your brain. There is no sun in space. You are simply duped.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #470 on: February 27, 2014, 04:56:15 AM »
Quote from: sceptimatic
Not everyone studies the moon
landing bullcrap you know. Most
people are busy doing other stuff and
at best, take fleeting glances at
snippets of info, which is not enough
to give anyone any insight
At last! This is the only thing you have said so far that makes any sense! Does this explain why you are taken in by photos showing the wrong side of the lem, well know photoshopped fakes etc? It is fine for you to admit that you don't really know much about the subject and have only taking a passing interest in the subject. It would explain why you have unravelled so spectacularly over the last 20 odd pages.
No passing interest here my friend. I'm well up on it. It's you and your little buddies that are not clued in, except to be armed with debunking ammo that's on a plate for you.
Keep trying though, you never know, you might convert me before you're 100 years old.

*

glokta

  • 598
  • +0/-0
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #471 on: February 27, 2014, 05:04:59 AM »
Quote from: sceptimatic
Not everyone studies the moon
landing bullcrap you know. Most
people are busy doing other stuff and
at best, take fleeting glances at
snippets of info, which is not enough
to give anyone any insight
At last! This is the only thing you have said so far that makes any sense! Does this explain why you are taken in by photos showing the wrong side of the lem, well know photoshopped fakes etc? It is fine for you to admit that you don't really know much about the subject and have only taking a passing interest in the subject. It would explain why you have unravelled so spectacularly over the last 20 odd pages.
No passing interest here my friend. I'm well up on it. It's you and your little buddies that are not clued in, except to be armed with debunking ammo that's on a plate for you.
Keep trying though, you never know, you might convert me before you're 100 years old.
There is no denying it, the extent of your knowledge is plain for everyone to see. I will leave it at that.
Quote from: sceptimatic
Use your brain. There is no sun in space. You are simply duped.

?

SirSpankalot

  • 601
  • +0/-0
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #472 on: February 27, 2014, 05:07:32 AM »
Moderators, can we lock this thread?

*

glokta

  • 598
  • +0/-0
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #473 on: February 27, 2014, 05:12:26 AM »
It is strange that a certain mod doesn't step in and stop a thread descending into chaos when it is a flat earther that is up against the ropes.  ::)
Quote from: sceptimatic
Use your brain. There is no sun in space. You are simply duped.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #474 on: February 27, 2014, 05:15:39 AM »
Quote from: sceptimatic
Not everyone studies the moon
landing bullcrap you know. Most
people are busy doing other stuff and
at best, take fleeting glances at
snippets of info, which is not enough
to give anyone any insight
At last! This is the only thing you have said so far that makes any sense! Does this explain why you are taken in by photos showing the wrong side of the lem, well know photoshopped fakes etc? It is fine for you to admit that you don't really know much about the subject and have only taking a passing interest in the subject. It would explain why you have unravelled so spectacularly over the last 20 odd pages.
No passing interest here my friend. I'm well up on it. It's you and your little buddies that are not clued in, except to be armed with debunking ammo that's on a plate for you.
Keep trying though, you never know, you might convert me before you're 100 years old.
There is no denying it, the extent of your knowledge is plain for everyone to see. I will leave it at that.
I know! I didn't ask to be a genius but some people are just gifted I suppose. One day if you work hard and gain some common sense and logic, maybe you can be one. I think it has to be in you though. You know what I mean?

As long as you gain a bit of commons ense, it's a start, in my opinion. If you pm me, maybe I can give you a few pointers to help you. Obviously it will stay private. I'm not the type to go boasting that I helped you.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #475 on: February 27, 2014, 05:18:11 AM »
Moderators, can we lock this thread?
Sorry, son, no can do. I will say one thing though. I do believe this should be in flat earth general as it is more of a conspiracy topic.
You can't beg for something to be locked when it doesn't suit you, Spanky boy. You do have the option of staying out of it or ignoring me, so try that. I'm only trying to help you.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2014, 05:21:21 AM by sceptimatic »

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #476 on: February 27, 2014, 05:20:17 AM »
It is strange that a certain mod doesn't step in and stop a thread descending into chaos when it is a flat earther that is up against the ropes.  ::)
Why should it be stopped? I mean you boys are on a roll, you're wiping me out aren't you? keep going, you're all destroying me. Don't let up or I might gain in strength and really tear you all a new one.  ;D

*

JimmyTheCrab

  • 10340
  • +0/-5
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #477 on: February 27, 2014, 05:35:08 AM »
Space is neither hot or cold as we are told, so therefore we can only assume that the body heat of the actornauts will heat up inside the craft and is insulted in a vacuum, so no escape from the build up of heat, not to mention all the electronics running.
If it's to stop the sun heating it up, well, turkeys don't fare too well in ovens when foil covered.
Anyone for baked actornauts? Leg or breast?
This is all completely wrong.  Of course heat can radiate off into space.
Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.

?

SirSpankalot

  • 601
  • +0/-0
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #478 on: February 27, 2014, 05:37:11 AM »
Space is neither hot or cold as we are told, so therefore we can only assume that the body heat of the actornauts will heat up inside the craft and is insulted in a vacuum, so no escape from the build up of heat, not to mention all the electronics running.
If it's to stop the sun heating it up, well, turkeys don't fare too well in ovens when foil covered.
Anyone for baked actornauts? Leg or breast?
This is all completely wrong.  Of course heat can radiate off into space.

Are you surprised?  Everything this idiot has stated as fact as been total fantasy. How anyone can so unbelievably dopey is way beyond my understanding.

He's a fuckin psycho.


*

glokta

  • 598
  • +0/-0
Re: At sceptimatic's request...
« Reply #479 on: February 27, 2014, 05:38:58 AM »
It is strange that a certain mod doesn't step in and stop a thread descending into chaos when it is a flat earther that is up against the ropes.  ::)
Why should it be stopped? I mean you boys are on a roll, you're wiping me out aren't you? keep going, you're all destroying me. Don't let up or I might gain in strength and really tear you all a new one.  ;D
Why should it be stopped descending into chaos? Because I would prefer a debate. For every piece of "evidence" you present, we have to deal with 15 pages of the psycho-drama of you.
Quote from: sceptimatic
Use your brain. There is no sun in space. You are simply duped.