I encourage you all to continue to logically challenge information that is presented to us. Especially when that information is coming from an unreliable source such as Flat Earth society or any of it's members.
Fixed.
You have no intention of thinking. You're not here for that. You are here to attempt ridicule. The only questions are. Are you here to make yourself feel good or are you paid to do it.
If you, with your tiny deluded mind, can even comprehend the controversial string field theory I accept in physics you'll understand that I'm all for controversy. Theories of everything literally requires redesigning physics from the ground up as there still is one flaw in everything mathematically and physically: It is in existence…
Should I go ahead and just accept the so called "science" behind you're hypothesis without questioning it? Similar to saying we shouldn't agree with any of the evidence pointed out by governmental agencies, why should we treat treat Flat earthers any different?
Given the hypothesis's logic, none of the believers on this site has proven anything exept that they use falsifiable pseudoscience to support there claims with limited answers on the situations pointed out. These situations are the reason for questioning the world around you in the first place. It all boils down to on simple sentence. If you make a claim you need to prove it! Disbelieving the evidence supplied by physicist isn't proving your claim!
The debates sucks members such as myself into the site due to the lack of scientific reasoning. I pointed out on another site that it is like trying to avoid watching a nuclear bomb going off. Every single member have there own controversial beliefs not even supporting each other while none has the capability of using any physical tests to back it up.
So NO! it's not for the lols.
In the conversations none of the questions proposed get's valuable answers and the members here, including yourself immediately defend your beliefs with ad hominem attacks on the question askers. Somehow this attempts to turn the burden to us! WTF?
With that logic I could start a organisation that states what you dream is the real world and while you're awake, you are actually dreaming.
You made a statement on another thread that mainstream science always wins. That is completely incorrect, any theory/hypothesis has the ability to be falsified. Any
theory…
An example of this is a statement I heard last year coming straight from the Royal swedish academy of sciences. They said that that Nobel prize this year will not go to a scientist who discovers a new particle in quantum physics. The reason for this is the standard model is becoming a massively complex system that takes years of study to completely understand and they are just adding more complexity to it by discovering more and more particles. They need a higher solution to this problem.
So yeah, scepti. Once I see any form of value in your posts, I'll listen. But don't for one second think I wouldn't question a radical claim.