I don't know if you realize how extensively movies are used to influence public opinion and create fake events.
For example, did you know that 9/11 was basically just movies? The live television coverage was fake. The real event was probably an insurance scam, set up to also gain some political mileage. At the scene, they set up smoke screens and cleared the area, while jamming private video. Then on TV, they aired a bunch of rubbish. Flying projectiles coming in at all different angles, impossible shots, things not lining up properly, it goes on and on. All proven on cluesforum.info.
On that forum they have also proven that the 'mass shootings' alleged to occur especially in the USA are fake. Go see for yourself. They have done great work over there.
These things are all done to create political movements, and to induce an increasing degree of malleability in the populace.
There is no doubt that the use of phony footage and photographs began much, much before that. And indeed, the lunar landings are easy to detect as fakes. They probably even deliberately leak information, simply to let the air out a bit, and give the thing a chance to breathe. They only have to convince almost everybody, and almost everybody always believes what they put on the telly.
So don't doubt for a minute that they haven't thought of putting movies into the windows of flying objects, to fool passengers. Why not? It would be a cheap and easy way to propagandize everyone on earth.
Alleged war crimes are another use for fake pictures and movies. This goes way back. If you start studying, you'll be amazed at what you discover. You don't have to be a 'big conspiracy nut'. I'm not a nutter. A nutter will think things like, "Area 51 has aliens! They move underground! The Bushes are part Whack-a-mole! Soon we will all have a chip in our butts!" Etc. I'm just saying that the use of still and moving pictures to manipulate people is more extensive than you may realize. They don't need a chip in our butts to manipulate us.