It makes no logical sense for it not to.
But if it makes you happy, I'll now prove the atmospheric drainoff sans gravity just to make this whole side argument moot.
Let's review: our atmosphere is a very, very large collection of assorted air molecules. These molecules have mass and therefore have inertia.
Now, if earth is, as you say, accelerating upwards at 1 g, each of these molecules will have to be accelerated, as well. However, the air beneath the air on top is not enough to push it upward, so the air at the top will remain static until pushed on by a force strong enough to actually move it: a solid, in this case the earth.
When this is the case, the atmosphere will act like all other fluids, and it will flatten out until it reaches the boundaries of its container. However, in the flat earth model it has no container outside of the ice wall and therefore will drain away from the earth until it reaches the approximate height of the ice wall. From there, see my original post.
Why does it seem that this entire thing is just a joke to see how riled up everyone will get over it?
(Oh, and if you guys were actually right and there was a government conspiracy, one simple fact
would be true: this site would not exist and its creator(s) would be dead. Because that's how conspiring governments work, period. As that is not the case... Well, there you go.)
Again - you're assuming that things that are true of the RE model are still true on our flat Earth. This is simply not the case. Instead of referring to RE science, why don't you give us evidence we can test ourselves? Don't give us evidence we have to believe other people to accept.
Because RE science has evidence to back it up. FE 'science' must be put in quotes because it's 25% unfounded conspiracy theory, 25% random flawed theories that are explained differently (often with many debilitating contradictories) depending on what's being argued and 50% denial of all science that proves you wrong.
Regardless of what you call RE science and FE science, it's all science that has been proven on the earth that we exist on, meaning that all the observed science that is true in RE must also be true in FE for FE to even stand a chance of existing.
So sorry, dismissing my arguments as inapplicable is not going to defeat them.