How could flat earth conspiracists possibly explain THIS?

Newton started the NASA conspiracy. I'm hardly going to take his word for anything!

You do realize that low content posting is not appreciated in the serious discussion forums, don't you?

Quote from: muggsybogus1 on July 11, 2013, 06:54:44 AM

Newton started the NASA conspiracy. I'm hardly going to take his word for anything!

You do realize that low content posting is not appreciated in the serious discussion forums, don't you?

What is wrong with his comment. It contributes to this valuable discussion

So one time space flight is possible, the other time is not...let me guess. If it is a shot taken straight down towards earth and it shows up as flat to the camera. It is 100% true. Space shuttle is real, earth is real, picture is not photoshopped...it's a genuine picture.

And then again, you take the picture taken straight down depicting a 'flat' earth as real, without any doubt.

No. You are jumping to conclusions. It is being stated that the photo does not contradict FE, not necessarily that it is 100% real.

Quote from: Tom Bishop on July 10, 2013, 12:36:53 PM

Quote from: Scintific Method on July 07, 2013, 09:56:08 PM

Quote from: Junker on July 07, 2013, 06:20:58 PM

This photo doesn't show anything that would contradict FE.  Unless I am missing the curvature of the Earth in the photo.

True, all it does is prove space flight is real.

How do you know it's in space opposed to the upper atmosphere?

How do you know you're real opposed to the fantasy of someone's elses mind?

That has nothing to do with the photo so it is irrelevant.

Quote from: muggsybogus1 on July 11, 2013, 06:54:44 AM

Newton started the NASA conspiracy. I'm hardly going to take his word for anything!

You do realize that low content posting is not appreciated in the serious discussion forums, don't you?

Spoken like a true disinformation operative.

The Verbs of our ForFathers are underlass past doth night

This post really doesn't rate a reply......
But................................................
Anyway..........................................
Does gibberish like this count for "low content posting."

He can't even spell "Fore Fathers" correctly. 
Translation please ?

Quote from: muggsybogus1 on July 11, 2013, 06:54:44 AM

Quote from: markjo on July 11, 2013, 06:20:31 AM

Quote from: OrbisNonSufficit on July 10, 2013, 09:55:50 PM

Yeah but the debate is not about whether it is in space or not, its about whether or not it is using the atmosphere to keep itself afloat, as opposed to the very odd idea that the "spacecraft is endlessly falling around the earth.  Due to the ludicrous nature of the second idea, ill stick with the first, that or it is photo shopped.

Why is the idea of constantly falling over the edge of the earth (orbit) so ludicrous?  Newton conceived the principle almost 300 years ago, and assuming that you believe in a round earth and gravity, it's really quite simple and intuitive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_cannonball

Newton started the NASA conspiracy. I'm hardly going to take his word for anything!

I never knew that NASA was created by Newton. It's amazing that the US space agency was created long before the US was.  Fascinating!

Equally fascinating that I don't think Newton had even  ever been to the Colonies either !
(Maybe to plant the idea for NASA to future generations ?)

Fore Fathers and ForFathers both are separate in their meaning

I am aware of the usage and it has been stated

doesnt look photoshopped to me...

An airplane taking a picture of a nice model? or cgi..or .. actually thats it.

Quote from: acesuv on July 07, 2013, 06:07:52 PM

doesnt look photoshopped to me...

An airplane taking a picture of a nice model? or cgi..or .. actually thats it.

What about this picture makes you think it was photoshop or cgi?