Lizardmen questions

The lizard conspiracy is central to flat earth theory.

Does this have any relevance or should I move it to the "Complete Nonsense" section?



Oh wait that is your job.

Does this have any relevance or should I move it to the "Complete Nonsense" section?



Oh wait that is your job.

The lizard conspiracy is central to flat earth theory.

Quote from: RyanTG on May 25, 2013, 02:04:35 PM

Does this have any relevance or should I move it to the "Complete Nonsense" section?



Oh wait that is your job.

You are just as powerful as he is.

I have a few questions about the lizardmen that John Davis so fervently denies the existence of.

1) If not lizardmen, who exactly is hiding the shape of the earth from us?

2) If lizardmen don't exist, why the deliberate and unprompted thread denying all existence? It seems very orchestrated.

3) Why are the flat earth society suppressing information about the lizardmen?

4) Why do lizardmen not appear in the FAQ, earth not a globe and the site wiki when [they are such a central part]

5) Why is such a central theory completely swept under the carpet by the flat earth society?

6) Can we assume that John Davis speaks on behalf of the entire society? Will Lord Wilmore personally endorse John Davis' lizardman stance or like the rest of us, dismiss him as a boring drunkard with a history of substance abuse and psychotic episodes?

A lizard man should be identifiable by a few simple clues. Likely a lack of shame or guilt would be present, liars by nature with an almost complete lack of appreciation towards matters of love.  Intense  lack of will to apologize or be shown to be as "incorrect" would also be likely.  Likely unwilling to confront the nature when confronted with this truth some might even rewrite their own memory to exalt these beasts. Perhaps issues identifying sarcasm, double speak, or abstraction, however perhaps thats why some would say they made hybrids to begin with.

Quote from: John Davis on May 29, 2013, 09:08:25 AM

A lizard man should be identifiable by a few simple clues. Likely a lack of shame or guilt would be present, liars by nature with an almost complete lack of appreciation towards matters of love.  Intense  lack of will to apologize or be shown to be as "incorrect" would also be likely.  Likely unwilling to confront the nature when confronted with this truth some might even rewrite their own memory to exalt these beasts. Perhaps issues identifying sarcasm, double speak, or abstraction, however perhaps thats why some would say they made hybrids to begin with.

You realize that covers a good chunk of the members on both sides here, don't you?

I'm sure it does.  Well, it seems that if such a large percent of people here are capable of lying, a position I thought was impossible, I have no grounds to my previous claim that it was indeed impossible that a conspiracy could consist of 50% of the world.  I think if anything this shows it is possible that if it was advantageous enough to a small or large group to control another subset of man through some lever, that small or large group could make it happen. Especially given that people see what they want to and would purposefully ignore any such conspiracy or label it as "wacky."

Either that or a large part of regulars in FES are, in fact, lizards dominated by dominance and power struggles, and petty fights.  If a bird is a dinosaur, man is certainly at least a hybrid lizard.  What then of those who rely heaviest on these genes of dominance and brut -- those who reject the abstract? Where should this line be drawn? Is it any different to call them lizards, or sociopaths, or devils, or fae, or beasts?  Does name alone matter?

If we are to believe dinosaurs ruled the Earth, and even built boats when humans where just scurrying rodents then me must assume the reptilian race upon as is superior. Even in Genesis a snake outwitted humans. 
What hope does the human race have?

For the record, I am not a lizard, nor am I of reptilian ancestry (to the best of my knowledge).

For the record, I am not a lizard, nor am I of reptilian ancestry (to the best of my knowledge).

Quote from: iwanttobelieve on May 29, 2013, 05:29:52 PM

If we are to believe dinosaurs ruled the Earth, and even built boats when humans where just scurrying rodents then me must assume the reptilian race upon as is superior. Even in Genesis a snake outwitted humans. 
What hope does the human race have?

Jesus is your only hope.

Quote from: iwanttobelieve on May 29, 2013, 05:29:52 PM

If we are to believe dinosaurs ruled the Earth, and even built boats when humans where just scurrying rodents then me must assume the reptilian race upon as is superior. Even in Genesis a snake outwitted humans. 
What hope does the human race have?

Jesus is your only hope.

For the record, I am not a lizard, nor am I of reptilian ancestry (to the best of my knowledge).

Quote from: Lord Wilmore on May 29, 2013, 05:34:20 PM

For the record, I am not a lizard, nor am I of reptilian ancestry (to the best of my knowledge).

But it's well known that lizards are notorious liars, so of course you would deny your reptilian ancestry.

Quote from: markjo on May 29, 2013, 06:28:31 PM

Quote from: Lord Wilmore on May 29, 2013, 05:34:20 PM

For the record, I am not a lizard, nor am I of reptilian ancestry (to the best of my knowledge).

But it's well known that lizards are notorious liars, so of course you would deny your reptilian ancestry.

Are the lizard men the origin of the liar's paradox?