What now FE'ers?

yet, not even one single person whom believes in flat earth can show even a photoshopped picture of the giant ice wall with the pink teddys and machine gune gaurding it

The internet is a glorious place. Anything you want. Pink bears in the snow with guns, round planets, whatever you can imagine.

Posting a video or picture has to questioned. Its too easy to find anything you like these days.

Quote from: eartheater on October 30, 2010, 10:12:06 AM

yet, not even one single person whom believes in flat earth can show even a photoshopped picture of the giant ice wall with the pink teddys and machine gune gaurding it

The internet is a glorious place. Anything you want. Pink bears in the snow with guns, round planets, whatever you can imagine.

Posting a video or picture has to questioned. Its too easy to find anything you like these days.

Then by all means, point out how you determined the video in question was faked.

Quote from: Thork on November 01, 2010, 04:35:33 PM

Quote from: eartheater on October 30, 2010, 10:12:06 AM

yet, not even one single person whom believes in flat earth can show even a photoshopped picture of the giant ice wall with the pink teddys and machine gune gaurding it

The internet is a glorious place. Anything you want. Pink bears in the snow with guns, round planets, whatever you can imagine.

Posting a video or picture has to questioned. Its too easy to find anything you like these days.

Then by all means, point out how you determined the video in question was faked.

Indeed it is round earth evidence. Surely round earther's should verify its authenticity before use. This still has not been done.

So we revert to a burden of proof argument yet again. You are saying that the video must be considered fake unless it can be verified as accurate? Why do you not hold any of FE's "evidence" to the same standard?

So we revert to a burden of proof argument yet again. You are saying that the video must be considered fake unless it can be verified as accurate? Why do you not hold any of FE's "evidence" to the same standard?

Do not try to trick me with word games. We are only interested in earth's shape. This 'evidence' cannot be verified. Therefore it cannot be used.

Quote from: General Disarray on November 01, 2010, 05:59:37 PM

So we revert to a burden of proof argument yet again. You are saying that the video must be considered fake unless it can be verified as accurate? Why do you not hold any of FE's "evidence" to the same standard?

Do not try to trick me with word games. We are only interested in earth's shape. This 'evidence' cannot be verified. Therefore it cannot be used.

Please justify that the video cannot be verified as unmodified.

Quote from: Thork on November 01, 2010, 06:02:11 PM

Quote from: General Disarray on November 01, 2010, 05:59:37 PM

So we revert to a burden of proof argument yet again. You are saying that the video must be considered fake unless it can be verified as accurate? Why do you not hold any of FE's "evidence" to the same standard?

Do not try to trick me with word games. We are only interested in earth's shape. This 'evidence' cannot be verified. Therefore it cannot be used.

Please justify that the video cannot be verified as unmodified.

Please justify that this video can be taken on face value.

Ah, so you are being a hypocrite by only holding one side to a certain standard of evidence.

well, if the earth was a flat circle, i dont think you would see a circular outline of a circle perpendicular to your point of view

http://sharp.hnet.uh.edu/doku.php
this was research done, i think this link was on the youtube description.  i think this provides verification