Am I the only one who finds this presentation of evidence odd? It seems extremely hypocritical...
Scenario #1:
FE'er posts audio clip of Moon conversation as proof. Dismisses the idea that it could be edited. This editing process would take almost no time and cost virtually nothing.
Scenario #2:
RE'er posts video of people on the ISS, spacewalks, etc. FE'ers immediately claim that the video could be faked. This faking process would take a ton of time and cost millions of dollars.
Except that I posted archives of the original live broadcasts, which shows the source material without gaps.
Ok fine, hypocrisy aside, let's actually look at the video. The one I'll be addressing is the eagle has landed, since it has the CBS video as well, therefore is more likely to be unedited. Through a lot of the video, Houston and Apollo 11 are not directly replying to each other. Houston will say one thing, then Apollo will say another that does not depend on being a reply to Houston. There are times their words even step on each other because of this. I noticed two distinct moments of delay though, both which were direct replies to something Houston said:
2:12-2:16 - at 2:12 Houston says "you are go for landing. over." Apollo replies ~4 seconds later "understand, go for landing."
6:12-6:16 - 6:12 Houston says "thanks a lot." ~4 seconds later Apollo replies "thank you."
I'm sure there are more, but I'm not going to rewatch the 10 minute video or any of the other long videos you posted to find them. If you want to mention some specific moments where there is an instant speak and reply from both sides, I'd be more than happy to look at it, but it's foolish to ask people to weed through hours of video to find the proof you say is there.