flatorange, the Tunguska event was not caused by a meteorite, asteroid or comet. Please read carefully, and avoid such silly mistakes in the future:
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php/topic,58190.msg1499960.html#msg1499960The Tunguska event proves very clearly that the Earth is actually flat.
Newspapers could be read at midnight in London, photographs could be taken outdoors in Stockholm without flash apparatus; no other meteorological/astronomical phenomenon occurred at that time in the world, no such records exist.
If the light from the Sun could not reach London due to curvature and/or any light reflection phenomena, then certainly NO LIGHT from an explosion which occurred at some 7 km altitude in the atmosphere could have been seen at all, at the same time, on a spherical earth.
This alone proves that we find ourselves in a geocentric context, where the Sun is much smaller than the Earth itself, and that my assertions are perfectly correct.
Eyewitness account:
Nizshne-Karelinskoye (465 km). Extremely bright (it was impossible to look at it) luminous body was seen rather high in the north-western sky soon after 8 a.m. It looked like a tube (cylinder) and for 10 minutes moved down to the ground. The sky was clear, but only in the side, where the body was seen, a small dark cloud was present low above the horizon. While coming to the ground, the body dispersed (flattened) and at this place a large puff of black smoke appeared. Then a flame emanated from this cloud.
500 meter altitude - 11.6 km visual obstacle
800 meter altitude - 10.4 km visual obstacle
1000 meters altitude - 9.7 km visual obstacle
At around 7:15 a.m., Tungus natives and Russian settlers in the hills northwest of Lake Baikal observed a column of bluish light, nearly as bright as the Sun, moving across the sky. About 10 minutes later, there was a flash and a loud "knocking" sound similar to artillery fire that went in short bursts spaced increasingly wider apart.
http://www.salem-news.com/articles/june302008/tunguska_day_6-30-08.phpThat is when Tungus natives and others living in the hills northwest of Russia's Lake Baikal reported seeing a column of bluish light, that they described as being almost as bright as the Sun, moving across the sky.
A few minutes later they reported a flash and a sound that many said resembled artillery fire. The accompanying shock wave broke windows thousands of miles away from the impact zone, and knocked countless numbers of people to the ground.
Even if we take a 560 km distance to Tunguska, and a 1 km altitude (although Lake Baikal is located at some 435 meters in elevation), the visual obstacle will measure 15.5 km, no way for anybody located at Lake Baikal to have seen the explosion itself.
Let us ascend to 1,6 km in altitude at Lake Baikal; even then, the visual obstacle will measure 13.66 km.
Even the original trajectory (10 minutes duration) was seen from London before the actual explosion:
... we saw it between 12 o’clock (midnight) and 12:15 a.m. It was in the northeast and of a bright flame-colour like the light of sunrise or sunset.
Here is a diagram of what this would look like. The large circle represents a cutaway of a spherical Earth. I divided the Earth into 24 evenly spaced time zones. Point A represents an event happening. Point B represents an observer 7 time zones away. The line extending along the horizon at point B represents the line of view of the person at that point. He would never see the event happen.
Maxwell's original equations fulfill the dream of each and every physicist.
They unite terrestrial gravity and electricity.
J.C. Maxwell's genius was in understanding that there are two types of electrical forces: the dextrorotatory string and the laevorotatory string.
He proved that the a regular electromagnetic wave is made up of two such scalar waves of opposite spin.
The Biefeld Brown effect demonstrates beyond a shadow of a doubt the correctness of the original Maxwell equations.
During the period 1919 - 1923, Professor Paul Alfred Biefeld outlined to his student, Thomas Townsend Brown, certain experiments which led to the discovery of the phenomenon now known as the Biefeld-Brown effect. Further, these experiments helped to define the inter-relationship of electrical and gravitational fields. This coupling effect parallels electricity and magnetism.
The original experiments concerned the behavior of a condenser when charged with electricity.
The first startling result was that if placed in a free suspension with the poles horizontal, the condenser, when electrically charged, showed a forward thrust toward the positive pole !!! When the polarity was reversed, it caused a reversal of the direction of thrust.
Dr. Brown experimented with umbrella and disk shaped gravitators. The umbrella devices consisted of two electrodes, one positive and one negative, with one electrode shaped like a large bowl and the other like a smaller bowl. Overall, this formed an open-air capacitor but with asymmetric electrodes, whose asymmetric electric fields generated unbalanced gravitational divergences and increased acceleration. The disk gravitators, described earlier, did the same except one electrode formed the leading edge of the disk, while the other electrode formed the body and trailing edge.
Nevertheless, for those wishing to debunk the Biefeld-Brown effect by attributing it entirely to ion wind, it must be pointed out that closed capacitors, the cellular gravitators, also self-accelerate without any ion wind effects. Electrogravity arises primarily from the gravitational component of the electric field, harnessed for propulsion via the asymmetrical gravitational field of electric dipoles. Brown also experimented with disk gravitators in vacuum chambers and observed them accelerating nearly as quickly as when run at atmospheric pressure.
The Biefeld-Brown effect demonstrates a link between electricity and gravity.
#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Biefeld-Brown effect tested with Bi-Polar Tesla Coil#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Biefeld-Brown Effectsokarul, I read your diagrams, they are wonderful. I never doubted your ability to amass disconnected bits of data, no clear idea of context, or overall cognitive goal.
What we are debating here is the existence of ether waves, not their application to spectroscopy.
Remember that light does not split into a spectrum of colors as you have assumed up until now:
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php/topic,30499.msg1394310.html#msg1394310The ether waves' existence is clearly proven by DePalma, Kozyrev, Brown, Tesla, Nipher (their extrarordinary experiments).
Poll