-Stars in the sky in the south pole rotate just like the ones in the North Pole, perfectly explained by a round rotating earth.
See the Bi-Polar model: http://theflatearthsociety.org/wiki/index.php?title=Layout_of_the_Continents
The bipolar model has been debunked like a million (exaggeration) times by now. Please stop bringing it up. It brings more problems than the questions that it answers.
Just a few extremely stupid things that must happen according to the "bipolar model".
-2 suns required at midnight sun occurrences in both the north and south pole. One to rotate around pole, one to go around in a figure 8 pattern to bring light to the rest of the earth.
-No wall surrounding us? Why haven't we found the edge? What is holding the ocean in?
-Shapes of continents are massively distorted.
So, please. Stop mentioning this, and while you are at it, you might as well remove it from the FAQ, because it is woefully ignorant of many known facts, round or flat earth. It is just silly.
Do you mean like how Greenland is larger than Africa in your Mercator maps, yet people still manage to use it to navigate?
That is used to navigate only because up-down-left-right are north-south-west-east. That's it. Area is inaccurate. Google it. Oh wait, dont. Google is probably controlled by NASA too.
-side note. Acting like an FE guy now. How the hell do you know that greenland isn't larger than Africa? Have you personally mapped it out? Post back when you do, please. /end FE type rant.
http://theflatearthsociety.org/wiki/index.php?title=The_Setting_of_the_Sun
Does not explain why every celestial body is almost the exact same size instead of shrinking as it goes off into the distance. And, like many others have posted, the sun will never be less than about 10 degrees above the horizon, due to its size and closeness to Earth in the FE model.
Again, my list of "evidences" is not actual evidence. They are things that happen to perfectly coincide with the RE model. Look at Tom's response.
-2 (no, 3) bipolar model references despite that map being extremely flawed.
-Thinking that the mercator projection is used for travel and is accurate with area of land masses.
-Weird perspective things. Not a negative point, as it just doesn't make sense to me, so I can't say it is wrong. I will read that chapter in Earth Not a Globe later today.
-more conspiracy stuff.
Tom does have a fantastic rebuttal to the cosmological predictions.

The stars look like small specs in the sky. They do not look like giant things light years away.
Yes. Yes they do. I wonder how when the sun goes farther away from us it is "magnified" by our atmosphere in order to keep the same size, but all the stars remain the same size as they approach to the horizon.
Another anomaly in FE? No! Here is an explanation! Maybe the stars are giant fireflies with magical powers that prevent magnification of their glowing butts. Goes right in line with the glowing moon shrimp. I expect this to be in the FAQ by tomorrow.
Anyway, my point was, every summer for me at least, I am able to see the Milky Way galaxy on a dark clear night. It really looks like all the other millions of galaxies in the sky. Why is ours so huge? There are billions of galaxies visible if you have the equipment to find them. Are those really tiny galaxies?