« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Handy chart of fallacies

  • 18 Replies
  • 3712 Views
*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Handy chart of fallacies
« on: March 16, 2013, 03:33:58 AM »
Might be handy for here on FES. Click the image below for a larger version.

Logged
Quote from: Ævan on August 11, 2013, 01:18:20 PM
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.
?

Crudblud

  • 2427
  • +0/-0
  • Scone Advocate
Re: Handy chart of fallacies
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2013, 03:41:42 AM »
Conglaturation !!! You have completed a great post. And prooved the justice of our culture. Now go and rest our heroes !
Logged
?

Thork

Re: Handy chart of fallacies
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2013, 05:17:41 AM »
Why are you giving away all my tricks? >:(
Logged
?

Crudblud

  • 2427
  • +0/-0
  • Scone Advocate
Re: Handy chart of fallacies
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2013, 07:22:04 AM »
Quote from: Thork on March 16, 2013, 05:17:41 AM
Why are you giving away all my tricks? >:(
That is the justice of our culture, Parsifal has prooved it.
Logged
*

Supertails

  • 4376
  • +0/-0
  • what do i put here
Re: Handy chart of fallacies
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2013, 09:49:38 AM »
Handy chart of phallacies.
Logged
Recently listened to:

*

Saddam Hussein

  • Official Member
  • 35188
  • +1/-0
  • Former President of Iraq
Re: Handy chart of fallacies
« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2013, 01:06:26 PM »
Quote from: Saddam Hussein on March 15, 2013, 07:57:05 PM
That's not a very good chart to be consulting.  Most of it is very badly explained, and some of it is just wrong.

Just in case anyone missed this in the other thread.
Logged
*

Rushy

  • 8970
  • +0/-0
Re: Handy chart of fallacies
« Reply #6 on: March 16, 2013, 01:19:21 PM »
I can tell the exact social and political background of the person who made this chart by just reading the example sentences. They're also not very good examples.
Logged
*

FlatOrange

  • 2458
  • +0/-0
Re: Handy chart of fallacies
« Reply #7 on: March 16, 2013, 03:17:45 PM »
Here's the guide I like to follow:

FlatOrange's complete guide on how to not give a fuck:

1. Don't give a fuck
Logged
Quote from: Heiwa
You are ignoring this user. Show me the post.
*

Particle Person

  • 5944
  • +0/-0
Re: Handy chart of fallacies
« Reply #8 on: March 16, 2013, 04:34:26 PM »
Quote from: Rushy on March 16, 2013, 01:19:21 PM
I can tell the exact social and political background of the person who made this chart by just reading the example sentences. They're also not very good examples.

You are so smart.
Logged
?

Nomad

  • Official Member
  • 16894
  • +0/-0
Re: Handy chart of fallacies
« Reply #9 on: March 16, 2013, 05:14:40 PM »
copycat
Logged
Quote from: PizzaPlanet on March 24, 2011, 11:05:27 AM
Nomad is a superhero.

8/30 NEVAR FORGET
*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Handy chart of fallacies
« Reply #10 on: March 16, 2013, 06:28:41 PM »
Quote from: Nomad on March 16, 2013, 05:14:40 PM
copycat

I filed a bug report and the response was "won't fix". I had no choice but to fork your thread.
Logged
Quote from: Ævan on August 11, 2013, 01:18:20 PM
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.
?

Nomad

  • Official Member
  • 16894
  • +0/-0
Re: Handy chart of fallacies
« Reply #11 on: March 16, 2013, 09:07:06 PM »
Yeah well my thread was not open source, I'm suing for copyright infringement
Logged
Quote from: PizzaPlanet on March 24, 2011, 11:05:27 AM
Nomad is a superhero.

8/30 NEVAR FORGET
?

A Doubter

  • 308
  • +0/-0
Re: Handy chart of fallacies
« Reply #12 on: March 22, 2013, 02:22:35 PM »
I do like the chart.  Mostly, I like that pretty much everything on it is demonstrated here.
Logged
Quote from: bullhorn on March 27, 2013, 03:43:34 PM
The video demonstrates that we can not fully trust our senses.
*

kevinagain

  • 527
  • +0/-0
Re: Handy chart of fallacies
« Reply #13 on: March 22, 2013, 03:43:22 PM »
very good examples of tools used in rhetoric.

logic is easier, though, as the hardest part is peeling away the extraneous words until the argument sits in front of you. once you do that, it's easy to see whether or not it's valid.

less easy to see whether or not the conclusion is true.
Logged
true wisdom is always concise
*

Rama Set

  • 6875
  • +1/-0
  • I am also an engineer
Re: Handy chart of fallacies
« Reply #14 on: March 22, 2013, 05:01:14 PM »
Can we rename this thread Sceptimatic's Toolbox?
Logged
Quote from: charles bloomington on April 25, 2015, 04:13:06 PM
Aether is the  characteristic of action or inaction of charged  & noncharged particals.
*

kevinagain

  • 527
  • +0/-0
Re: Handy chart of fallacies
« Reply #15 on: March 23, 2013, 05:50:59 AM »
sceptimatic has never used an appeal to authority, that i can recall.

that and appeals to ignorance are often attempted against his arguments, though.
Logged
true wisdom is always concise
*

Rama Set

  • 6875
  • +1/-0
  • I am also an engineer
Re: Handy chart of fallacies
« Reply #16 on: March 24, 2013, 04:46:09 PM »
Quote from: kevinagain on March 23, 2013, 05:50:59 AM
sceptimatic has never used an appeal to authority, that i can recall.

that and appeals to ignorance are often attempted against his arguments, though.

That just means he does not know how to use the tools in his toolbox.
Logged
Quote from: charles bloomington on April 25, 2015, 04:13:06 PM
Aether is the  characteristic of action or inaction of charged  & noncharged particals.
*

kevinagain

  • 527
  • +0/-0
Re: Handy chart of fallacies
« Reply #17 on: March 24, 2013, 07:24:30 PM »
well now, think about it, though.

look at the appeal to authority. sceptimatic's main focus is a self-reliance on personal perception and understanding. i expect he knows how to quote authorities as opposed to providing arguments, but he never does. all his stuff is justified in solo performances.

that's one tool that seems inconsistent with how he approaches a question.
Logged
true wisdom is always concise
*

Rama Set

  • 6875
  • +1/-0
  • I am also an engineer
Re: Handy chart of fallacies
« Reply #18 on: March 25, 2013, 05:00:26 AM »
Quote from: kevinagain on March 24, 2013, 07:24:30 PM
well now, think about it, though.

look at the appeal to authority. sceptimatic's main focus is a self-reliance on personal perception and understanding. i expect he knows how to quote authorities as opposed to providing arguments, but he never does. all his stuff is justified in solo performances.

that's one tool that seems inconsistent with how he approaches a question.

Fair enough, I just will not be surprised if he does it one day.
Logged
Quote from: charles bloomington on April 25, 2015, 04:13:06 PM
Aether is the  characteristic of action or inaction of charged  & noncharged particals.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »