This is just absolutely stupid now... Lots of people leave universities qualified enough to under the science you like to shit on... People can even do it after high school...
This is where you are misunderstanding me though. I have every respect for those who go to universities to learn whatever they choose to learn and I'm well aware of the effort they put into gaining the required qualifications of what they choose to learn, so it's pointless you making out I'm trying to crap on peoples choices, because I'm not.
If a person goes to university to study English and the arts etc and their goal is to become a teacher, then great, they earned that right to do that if their grades are what's required.
The same goes for everything else a university offers.
Now if someone goes to university to learn astro physics, they are learning about what's told to them about the universe from what they can view themselves , plus all the equations that are put out to show this, that and the other and they can come out of university, qualified to go into a filed that requires that particular qualification and even end up teaching it to others as time goes on.
A nuclear physicist course can deal with theories on atoms and whatever they teach and what they teach you is perfectly feasible to you because it all appears to fit, in theory, yet in proof, you would need to do the experiments to view the end product of what you have learned, which would mean seeing fissioning in action of lumps of metal, basically.
Of course, as in astro physics and nuclear and many other theory driven subjects, you get marked on what they put into your "memory" and become qualified on how you read that from your "memory."
All of what you learn has an impact on your life but all of what you learn doesn't mean that it's all the actual reality of life, as some of it relies on theory, which in the science world is as good as fact but it isn't actually fact, if you get my meaning.
So how can a system work in teaching people how something works, like E=MC2, relativity, general and special, the big bang, dinosaurs and all the rest of it.
Well first of all, it's about who can tell the best story and not only tell that story but actually put in the proofs to make that story a believable story so people see it as non-fiction rather than a fiction.
A tramp off the street can't walk into a university , stand in front of you and expect you to believe in something he's made up, even if it appears to be sound, as he would be rejected as just some bozo peddling his thoughts, yet take him away and cut his hair, shave him and bathe him and stick a white coat on him with Dr blah blah PHD, then send him to another class to peddle the very same thing he done as the tramp and it all makes sense to the class, because they immediately hang on to and respect the man and his teachings.
Most of lifes teachings do actually have an end product but there's a hell of a lot of end product which is simply recycled back into each generations minds by the very same people who believe they learned from the master and who are now the class of the next generations master and so on and so on.
That's life and what you learn with your theories that you believe are fact, you will happily teach those under you in later years after you qualify to do so. You are well paid, you believe you are making a difference and everyone is happy.
So as you can see, whether some of what we learn is maybe fabricated, it still plays a part in life, it just may not be exactly the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.