How "satellites" works.

  • 106 Replies
  • 28246 Views
*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: How "satellites" works.
« Reply #90 on: February 10, 2013, 04:45:57 AM »

Thaggy:
Why do rockets have a large open pit under them?

*

Pythagoras

  • 3274
  • +0/-0
Re: How "satellites" works.
« Reply #91 on: February 10, 2013, 04:49:10 AM »
to deflect rocket exhaust i belive. can you see the difrence between a real rocket and a scale model from the videos i posted?

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: How "satellites" works.
« Reply #92 on: February 10, 2013, 05:00:00 AM »
to deflect rocket exhaust i belive. can you see the difrence between a real rocket and a scale model from the videos i posted?
It depends on the scale of the rocket.
Here's a scale rocket that took action men to the easily observed through a telescope "international space station."
Even circus owners can ride on this as long as they promise to blatantly take the absolute piss out of the ever willing public, by sticking a silly clowns nose on, just to show the absurdity of these fake space missions.

Now these "feel it in your chest" massive rocket launches, only require a reporter to stand a few hundred metres from the "chest rattling" launch, whilst also using her hair to shield her ear drums from going boom boom, bang bang.

They can launch these large rockets from anywhere. All you need , is a few small "made to look big" floodlight erections and a small scale platform for the small scale," made to look bigger" rocket to blast off from, with no large pit to absorb the supposed mega thrust of the engines, because as you can notice, they are not needed with these special rockets as they are mostly smokeless " kind to the ground" fuels.

Now you sit there and tell me , and tell me honestly, if you believe this scale model took anyone to a space station.

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">RT reporter metres from launch pad as Soyuz blasts off

*

Pythagoras

  • 3274
  • +0/-0
Re: How "satellites" works.
« Reply #93 on: February 10, 2013, 05:15:22 AM »
rockets make smoke?

The majority of the white clouds seen during the first few seconds of a shuttle launch is actually steam, not smoke. To dampen the noise from the powerful rocket motors on the shuttle, approximately 400,000 gallons of water are sprayed underneath the exhaust for six seconds before launch and fifteen seconds afterward. When the hot exhaust hits the water it evaporates, making an enormous cloud which will eventually precipitate and turn into rain.  also the shutle engins 3 main engins are fuled using liquid hydrogen and oxygen. do you know chemistry? what do those two sunbstances make? the 1st two stages of soyuz uses kerosine. hence no water vapour. alos they dont use water to dampen the noise becuse the rocket launches take place in a populated area.

do some reaserch.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: How "satellites" works.
« Reply #94 on: February 10, 2013, 05:21:30 AM »
rockets make smoke?

The majority of the white clouds seen during the first few seconds of a shuttle launch is actually steam, not smoke. To dampen the noise from the powerful rocket motors on the shuttle, approximately 400,000 gallons of water are sprayed underneath the exhaust for six seconds before launch and fifteen seconds afterward. When the hot exhaust hits the water it evaporates, making an enormous cloud which will eventually precipitate and turn into rain.  also the shutle engins 3 main engins are fuled using liquid hydrogen and oxygen. do you know chemistry? what do those two sunbstances make? the 1st two stages of soyuz uses kerosine. hence no water vapour. alos they dont use water to dampen the noise becuse the rocket launches take place in a populated area.

do some reaserch.
;D ;D ;D ;D

*

Pythagoras

  • 3274
  • +0/-0
Re: How "satellites" works.
« Reply #95 on: February 10, 2013, 05:34:53 AM »
and whats that adsactly ^^^^ ???

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: How "satellites" works.
« Reply #96 on: February 10, 2013, 05:40:06 AM »
and whats that adsactly ^^^^ ???
Your attempt to explain a clearly small scale rocket.

*

Pythagoras

  • 3274
  • +0/-0
Re: How "satellites" works.
« Reply #97 on: February 10, 2013, 05:47:43 AM »
« Last Edit: February 10, 2013, 05:57:00 AM by Pythagoras »


*

Pythagoras

  • 3274
  • +0/-0
Re: How "satellites" works.
« Reply #99 on: February 10, 2013, 07:16:39 AM »
you fail is so epic i have spent the last hour thinking to myself if i should tell you whats wrong with your video. i decided i would. ;D

you pick a video with no trees buildings or any recognisable structures on purpose . this is so that we cant guage the size and distance of the object you are showing. we have only 2 things in this shot. the reporter and the launch site. this is not adequate for distinguishing size or distance becuase the eyes are esialy fooles. thats why i show videos with recognsable objects in to show scale apropriatly.

now on to how i know how far away she is. she is about 1000 meters away by the way. we  use the sound of the rocket. notice at the 2 second mark we see the engins egnite. but no noise. then at about 5 seconds we finaly hear the engin egnition. so the sound has taken 3 seconds to reach the reporter. now tell me, how far does sound travle in 3 seconds? whats that? about 1000meters? lol. hang your head in shame for bieng so deceptive

P.S dont forget the Soyuz-FG is alot slimer than the shuttle and not as tall. and vastly smaller than the satern v
« Last Edit: February 10, 2013, 07:31:33 AM by Pythagoras »

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: How "satellites" works.
« Reply #100 on: February 10, 2013, 08:09:35 AM »
you fail is so epic i have spent the last hour thinking to myself if i should tell you whats wrong with your video. i decided i would. ;D

you pick a video with no trees buildings or any recognisable structures on purpose . this is so that we cant guage the size and distance of the object you are showing. we have only 2 things in this shot. the reporter and the launch site. this is not adequate for distinguishing size or distance becuase the eyes are esialy fooles. thats why i show videos with recognsable objects in to show scale apropriatly.

now on to how i know how far away she is. she is about 1000 meters away by the way. we  use the sound of the rocket. notice at the 2 second mark we see the engins egnite. but no noise. then at about 5 seconds we finaly hear the engin egnition. so the sound has taken 3 seconds to reach the reporter. now tell me, how far does sound travle in 3 seconds? whats that? about 1000meters? lol. hang your head in shame for bieng so deceptive

P.S dont forget the Soyuz-FG is alot slimer than the shuttle and not as tall. and vastly smaller than the satern v
Well it certainly fooled you didn't it.

*

Pythagoras

  • 3274
  • +0/-0
Re: How "satellites" works.
« Reply #101 on: February 10, 2013, 10:23:05 AM »
well no considering i called you out on it right away. ??? so we have either caught you out bieng the troll you are, or you realy are the incredably stupid stuborn and blinkerd person you would have to be if not a troll.
« Last Edit: February 10, 2013, 10:28:33 AM by Pythagoras »

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: How "satellites" works.
« Reply #102 on: February 10, 2013, 10:44:26 AM »
well no considering i called you out on it right away. ??? so we have either caught you out bieng the troll you are, or you realy are the incredably stupid stuborn and blinkerd person you would have to be if not a troll.
What exactly is a troll?

*

Dog

  • 1162
  • +0/-0
  • Literally a dog
Re: How "satellites" works.
« Reply #103 on: February 10, 2013, 11:27:27 AM »
It's pretty obvious to distinguish a real model from a scale model. Especially when you're there in person...
And nice attempt at bringing another country's much smaller rocket and launch pad to prove your point...

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45100
  • +87/-125
Re: How "satellites" works.
« Reply #104 on: February 10, 2013, 11:29:09 AM »
well no considering i called you out on it right away. ??? so we have either caught you out bieng the troll you are, or you realy are the incredably stupid stuborn and blinkerd person you would have to be if not a troll.
What exactly is a troll?
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=troll&defid=283884
Quote
troll
One who purposely and deliberately (that purpose usually being self-amusement) starts an argument in a manner which attacks others on a forum without in any way listening to the arguments proposed by his or her peers. He will spark of such an argument via the use of ad hominem attacks (i.e. 'you're nothing but a fanboy' is a popular phrase) with no substance or relevence to back them up as well as straw man arguments, which he uses to simply avoid addressing the essence of the issue.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: How "satellites" works.
« Reply #105 on: February 10, 2013, 11:44:40 AM »
It's pretty obvious to distinguish a real model from a scale model. Especially when you're there in person...
And nice attempt at bringing another country's much smaller rocket and launch pad to prove your point...
You are correct on the much smaller rocket. It's so much smaller, it looks like a model.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: How "satellites" works.
« Reply #106 on: February 10, 2013, 11:46:45 AM »
well no considering i called you out on it right away. ??? so we have either caught you out bieng the troll you are, or you realy are the incredably stupid stuborn and blinkerd person you would have to be if not a troll.
What exactly is a troll?
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=troll&defid=283884
Quote
troll
One who purposely and deliberately (that purpose usually being self-amusement) starts an argument in a manner which attacks others on a forum without in any way listening to the arguments proposed by his or her peers. He will spark of such an argument via the use of ad hominem attacks (i.e. 'you're nothing but a fanboy' is a popular phrase) with no substance or relevence to back them up as well as straw man arguments, which he uses to simply avoid addressing the essence of the issue.
Oh, so that's a troll.
Well I suppose we are all trolls in some way or another, pertaining to everything said in that quote.