evidence of moon missions

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Apollo 11 Earthrise - How One Photo Proves it was Real

photo that is very good evidence we went to the moon

brilliant video! pure observational science and calculations at its best! watch several times to really grasp all the math. then discus! enjoy!

Computer generated images are hardly any proof that man went to the moon to be fair, are they?
It's basically going back to the accepting what they tell you to believe based on their calculations.
I can say with 100% certainty, at least for my own personal satisfaction, that no man, or man made object has ever been anywhere near the moon, never mind on it.

I would like to second this statement.

Mizuki x

they didnt have computers like that in 1969. they had glorified calculators. so no CGI sorry.

"they didnt have computers like that in 1969. they had glorified calculators."

Which is one of the major reasons that many people think that the moon landings never took place.

Mizuki x

"they didnt have computers like that in 1969. they had glorified calculators."

Which is one of the major reasons that many people think that the moon landings never took place.

Mizuki x

I've seen this statement before and can never really understand why. Which part of the moon landings do you think required such a large amount of computing power?

everything computer can do a human or many humans can do themselves longhand. and second to the post just above.

everything computer can do a human or many humans can do themselves longhand. and second to the post just above.

I think they'd still need computers to do much of the legwork. I'm not saying they didn't have computers at all- they were just more rudimentary than today's.

everything that person did in the video can be done on paper but to out it on you tube he has to use a computer. all the math seems to work that he used and that's what we are interested in not the way he shows us.

no. why. is it odd to you? the moon is tidally locked in orbit around the earth. i think that's what it is called. link provided below to a expliantion
http://www.moonconnection.com/moon-same-side.phtml

because the tides move perfectly with the moon. seriously do you do no research?

#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Tides

watch this. tides explained with cool drawings

i dont know weather to laugh or cry.  do you know Ricky Gervais? im laughing like him right now.

why would the water suddenly rise and fall like a cliff? the moon dsnt suddenly appear above you. it slowly rotates around the earth slowly approaching an angle directly over your head and then slowly moves away.

the moons gravity does effect orbits of satellites. did you not know this? that's one reason why over time they need to make course corrections.
and the moon bulge. yes it does. did you not watch the whole you tube clip explaining it all?

You say over time they have to make course corrections?

How do 22,000 miles into space satellites make course corrections? What instrument detects that they have moved?
Also, they should be constantly making course corrections, not just the odd correction over time, if they existed I mean.

So the weaker moon can bulge the Earth and the stronger Earth makes the moon bulge. Ok.

If your car was overheating, and you took it to a mechanic. And he tells you that the problem is due to a blown head gasket. would you believe him or would you call bullshit and make up your own assumptions as to how your car works. maybe a government agent came around to your house and put chilli sauce in your rad causing your engine to get hot.

 I stopped at the mechanic. Now due to the fact that I have knowledge of engines, I would accept what I'm told and pay accordingly.

You can keep your chilli sauce.

Where did you gain your knowledge about engines? How do you know every thing you where told about engines isnt a lie? Have you ever taken one apart?

How do 22,000 miles into space satellites make course corrections? What instrument detects that they have moved?
Also, they should be constantly making course corrections, not just the odd correction over time, if they existed I mean.

So the weaker moon can bulge the Earth and the stronger Earth makes the moon bulge. Ok.

They make corrections with small thrusters, although more modern satellites use ion engines. They know their position based off of a GPS-like system from places on earth that can find out the characteristics of their orbits and therefore when to make corrections.

The moon's gravity is able to pull on the 'loose' water molecules to create the bulges in water, of course.

It's a good video, but sadly, it's 50 years ago and Flat-Earthers are out of touch with today's reality --- Mars Curiosity--- so there's no WAY they're going to believe the moon landings.

No matter how good the video is, they'll watch it think that they are smarter than the video.  No matter how much over their head it is, they're the smarter ones for not getting duped.

It's the only way to feel good about yourself.

It's a sad, flat world.

Yes we can safely assume you are wrong.
Do you know how much fuel hey would need? The size of their fuel tanks? The thrust required to maintain orbit? How often they need to make course corrections? You need to know all of head to know be able to tell us you know they can't. So good luck with that.

I don;t really need to know about the equations of space science because in my opinion, it's all shoehorned bullshit designed to fit.
I prefer to look at stuff logical, even though someone that's been blinded by science refuses to do and accepts the equations.

Every reply you post goes in the same order, which you call your "logic":

a) "I don't know/understand"
b) Therefore it's rubbish

Why don't you put some reasoning behind your broad assumptions?

on a flat earth or a round earth satellites stay in space due to velocity balanced with the UA or gravity.
the same reason as the moon.
so space travel is very possible.

Blinded by science? You keep on sayin science is all theoretical and all scientist do is learn pages of theory and copy results. You know that everything around you is science and I mean absolutely everything is created by science and technology. Scientist do experiments that directly match their results. How is all this theoretical? Your computer is created by science the electricity is created by science your food is created by science and your Meds are created by science. You can't pick and chose what science you like. It's all of nothing.

Don't get mixed up with science against space science, which is what I'm on about, not science on Earth.

What's the difference?

The difference is, most Earth science can be proved...space science is all based on guess work.

You don't believe newtons laws of motion. even tho they work just as much here on earth as they do in space.

On Earth, I have no problem with Newtons laws of motion.
In space, I do.

But why? They should work even better in space with no gravity or atmosphere.

what part of Newtons laws wont work in space?

do you mean if a space vessel fires a thruster, the vessel wont move?

Are you talking about when you said that the pressure of cold air around a rocket trying to displace hot gas coming out the back is what makes the rocket move upwards.
Thats pretty weak if you ask me.And shows a complete lack of understanding of how things work.

Blinded by science? You keep on sayin science is all theoretical and all scientist do is learn pages of theory and copy results. You know that everything around you is science and I mean absolutely everything is created by science and technology. Scientist do experiments that directly match their results. How is all this theoretical? Your computer is created by science the electricity is created by science your food is created by science and your Meds are created by science. You can't pick and chose what science you like. It's all of nothing.

You don't create things in science you discover them.

Quote from: SuperHater7810 on January 20, 2013, 08:01:09 AM

Are you talking about when you said that the pressure of cold air around a rocket trying to displace hot gas coming out the back is what makes the rocket move upwards.
Thats pretty weak if you ask me.And shows a complete lack of understanding of how things work.

It's about pushing against and expanding the air beneath it.

It's all in the stars and light years topic. Sift through it and you will see what my stance is.

I'll save you 40 pages of people trying to explain how Newton's 2nd law and rocket engines work.  Sceptimatic just doesn't get it.

I'll save you 40 pages of people trying to explain how Newton's 2nd law and rocket engines work.  Sceptimatic just doesn't get it.

Or at least he doesn't want to understand it. Believing in global conspiracies is much more exciting than plain old physics.

Believing in global conspiracies is much more exciting than plain old physics.

You just said a great truth.