Better bring a better augment, something not so stupid.
my list of favorite cats of all time goes likeMagical Mr. Mistoffelees
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
Nomad is a superhero.
The earth is round because the space man said so.
Bears are best.
Quote from: Genius on January 19, 2013, 02:40:57 PMBears are best.Yeah, best at slaughtering innocent people, you monster!
"Hamas, until you break off your alliance with the bears, you're on notice." "Bears are godless killing machines."
Quote from: OrbisNonSufficit on January 20, 2013, 10:38:13 AM"Hamas, until you break off your alliance with the bears, you're on notice." "Bears are godless killing machines." Damn right!
Only one thing can save our future. Give Thork a BanHammer for Th*rksakes!
cats are tastier than dogs
#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tiger vs Dog PackEven though they're just playing, you can see the raw power in the tiger's limbs versus the dogs' limbs being purely for mobility. If a tiger were to fight a wolf, the tiger wouldn't even need to use its teeth or claws, it could knock the wolf the fuck out with a single slap.
I don't know what you're implying, but you're probably wrong.
we can see who'd win in a fight between a polar bear and a tiger.
Particle Person for FES!
Quote from: EnigmaZV on January 22, 2013, 02:25:01 PMwe can see who'd win in a fight between a polar bear and a tiger.Can we? Polar bears are primarily aquatic hunters.
Quote from: Particle Person on January 22, 2013, 03:04:43 PMQuote from: EnigmaZV on January 22, 2013, 02:25:01 PMwe can see who'd win in a fight between a polar bear and a tiger.Can we? Polar bears are primarily aquatic hunters.Throw a tiger in the water next to a polar bear.
Also, Chris is hot.
Quote from: Nomad on January 18, 2013, 07:22:39 PM#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tiger vs Dog PackEven though they're just playing, you can see the raw power in the tiger's limbs versus the dogs' limbs being purely for mobility. If a tiger were to fight a wolf, the tiger wouldn't even need to use its teeth or claws, it could knock the wolf the fuck out with a single slap.So you're claim is that an animal 4x larger than another animal is most likely stronger? Also, Tigers are not directly related to the house cat, so your analogy is invalid. You'd be better off pitting a wolf against a wildcat, which is only slightly larger than a house cat. If not, and you want to pit extant caniforms vs extant feliforms, then by all means, we can see who'd win in a fight between a polar bear and a tiger.
Quote from: EnigmaZV on January 22, 2013, 02:25:01 PMQuote from: Nomad on January 18, 2013, 07:22:39 PM#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tiger vs Dog PackEven though they're just playing, you can see the raw power in the tiger's limbs versus the dogs' limbs being purely for mobility. If a tiger were to fight a wolf, the tiger wouldn't even need to use its teeth or claws, it could knock the wolf the fuck out with a single slap.So you're claim is that an animal 4x larger than another animal is most likely stronger? Also, Tigers are not directly related to the house cat, so your analogy is invalid. You'd be better off pitting a wolf against a wildcat, which is only slightly larger than a house cat. If not, and you want to pit extant caniforms vs extant feliforms, then by all means, we can see who'd win in a fight between a polar bear and a tiger.tigers are also much larger than a wolf
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.
Quote from: illmunati on January 23, 2013, 06:15:50 AMQuote from: EnigmaZV on January 22, 2013, 02:25:01 PMQuote from: Nomad on January 18, 2013, 07:22:39 PM#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tiger vs Dog PackEven though they're just playing, you can see the raw power in the tiger's limbs versus the dogs' limbs being purely for mobility. If a tiger were to fight a wolf, the tiger wouldn't even need to use its teeth or claws, it could knock the wolf the fuck out with a single slap.So you're claim is that an animal 4x larger than another animal is most likely stronger? Also, Tigers are not directly related to the house cat, so your analogy is invalid. You'd be better off pitting a wolf against a wildcat, which is only slightly larger than a house cat. If not, and you want to pit extant caniforms vs extant feliforms, then by all means, we can see who'd win in a fight between a polar bear and a tiger.tigers are also much larger than a wolfNot to mention the fact that a wolf is a good deal smaller than a tiger.
Quote from: Parsifal on January 23, 2013, 06:27:48 AMQuote from: illmunati on January 23, 2013, 06:15:50 AMQuote from: EnigmaZV on January 22, 2013, 02:25:01 PMQuote from: Nomad on January 18, 2013, 07:22:39 PM#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tiger vs Dog PackEven though they're just playing, you can see the raw power in the tiger's limbs versus the dogs' limbs being purely for mobility. If a tiger were to fight a wolf, the tiger wouldn't even need to use its teeth or claws, it could knock the wolf the fuck out with a single slap.So you're claim is that an animal 4x larger than another animal is most likely stronger? Also, Tigers are not directly related to the house cat, so your analogy is invalid. You'd be better off pitting a wolf against a wildcat, which is only slightly larger than a house cat. If not, and you want to pit extant caniforms vs extant feliforms, then by all means, we can see who'd win in a fight between a polar bear and a tiger.tigers are also much larger than a wolfNot to mention the fact that a wolf is a good deal smaller than a tiger.Don't forget that there's a great difference in size between the two of them.