Wikipedia is favouring the globularist again

  • 7 Replies
  • 5078 Views
?

Thork

Wikipedia is favouring the globularist again
« on: December 09, 2012, 05:08:04 PM »
Wikipedia needs amending

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedford_Level_experiment

Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedford_Level_experiment
Early results seemed to prove the Earth to be flat, but most later attempts to reproduce the observations firmly supported the established view that the Earth is a sphere.
That's total codswallop.

If anyone has a wikipedia account can they at the least bung a [citation needed] after it because the experiment was done 3 times.

1) Rowbotham. Earth shown to be flat.
2) Hampden and Wallace. Result annulled in a court of law.
3) Lady Blount. Earth shown to be flat.

« Last Edit: December 09, 2012, 05:11:33 PM by Thork »

*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • +1/-2
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: Wikipedia is favouring the globularist again
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2012, 08:14:08 PM »
Dr. Rowbotham performed his experiments dozens of times over the course of several years in front of audiences of friend and foe alike. Not one account exists of a globular result.
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."

*

FlatOrange

  • 2458
  • +0/-0
Re: Wikipedia is favouring the globularist again
« Reply #2 on: December 10, 2012, 12:44:28 AM »
Hasn't the experiment been done recently by Daniel?  When is he going to publish his results?  That would be very neat to read on wikipedia.
Quote from: Heiwa
You are ignoring this user. Show me the post.

*

garygreen

  • 598
  • +0/-0
Re: Wikipedia is favouring the globularist again
« Reply #3 on: December 10, 2012, 07:20:23 AM »
http://books.google.com/books?id=gp1IAAAAMAAJ&pg=RA1-PA170&lpg=RA1-PA170&dq=The+experimental+demonstration+of+the+curvature+of+the+Earth's+surface&source=bl&ots=9ruTCMBnB1&sig=FufJZoMwIUqNLMcIaLnrvJsYtac&hl=en&sa=X&ei=MfvFUO7TNsnW2gXm04GwBg&ved=0CFgQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=The%20experimental%20demonstration%20of%20the%20curvature%20of%20the%20Earth's%20surface&f=false



Also, I feel like you should be more angry about your own wiki promoting the globularist agenda: http://theflatearthsociety.org/wiki/index.php?title=Bedford_Level_Experiment

Quote
The most famous of the observations, and the one that was taught in schools until photographs of the Earth from space became available, involved a set of three poles fixed at equal height above water level along this length. As the surface of the water was assumed to be level, the discovery that the middle pole, when viewed carefully through a theodolite, was almost three feet higher than the poles at each end was finally accepted as a new proof that the surface of the earth was indeed curved.
[...]
In 1901 Henry Yule Oldham, a geography reader at King's College, Cambridge, conducted the definitive experiment described in Method, above.
Also, the people on your websites are specifically framing their claims, not to learn the truth of the matter, but because they want to "debunk" Apollo Hoax claims --

?

acenci

  • 55
  • +0/-0
Re: Wikipedia is favouring the globularist again
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2015, 06:19:41 AM »
Wikipedia needs amending

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedford_Level_experiment

Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedford_Level_experiment
Early results seemed to prove the Earth to be flat, but most later attempts to reproduce the observations firmly supported the established view that the Earth is a sphere.
That's total codswallop.

If anyone has a wikipedia account can they at the least bung a [citation needed] after it because the experiment was done 3 times.

1) Rowbotham. Earth shown to be flat.
2) Hampden and Wallace. Result annulled in a court of law.
3) Lady Blount. Earth shown to be flat.

Great news, thanks for bringing it up. I had long suspected that wikipedia was not spreading knowledge but propaganda. Suffice it to check the JFK and 911 entries on the perpetrators.

Of course it also tries to defame Rowbotham:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Rowbotham
Quote
allegations of sexual misconduct

The rule for me is that if it says someone is a conspiracy theorist, that is the person telling the truth. The same rule applies if they try to defame him.

But don't try to change it because these entries are directly under the satanic elite's control.

*

kman

  • 990
  • +0/-0
  • Pastafarian
Re: Wikipedia is favouring the globularist again
« Reply #5 on: February 21, 2015, 06:47:49 AM »
The rule for me is that if it says someone is a conspiracy theorist, that is the person telling the truth. The same rule applies if they try to defame him.


That is honestly a pretty stupid rule. Do you beleive that David Icke has really uncovered the fact that the world is run by lizard people? Do you beleive that New Earth has been on a inter dimensional nazi UFO? Do you believe that Vauxhal has had sex with a shape shifting baby turtle?

Additionally, I don't see how it's possible that not a single conspiracy theorist has ever done something to break the law.
« Last Edit: February 21, 2015, 09:44:56 AM by kman »
Quote from: Excelsior John
[USA TODAY and NPR] are probaley just a bunch of flippin wite sapremist websites you RASCIST
Quote from: modestman
i don't understand what you are saying=therfore you are liar

*

Dinosaur Neil

  • 3177
  • +0/-0
Re: Wikipedia is favouring the globularist again
« Reply #6 on: February 21, 2015, 12:47:15 PM »
Wikipedia needs amending

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedford_Level_experiment

Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedford_Level_experiment
Early results seemed to prove the Earth to be flat, but most later attempts to reproduce the observations firmly supported the established view that the Earth is a sphere.
That's total codswallop.

If anyone has a wikipedia account can they at the least bung a [citation needed] after it because the experiment was done 3 times.

1) Rowbotham. Earth shown to be flat.
2) Hampden and Wallace. Result annulled in a court of law.
3) Lady Blount. Earth shown to be flat.

1. Result was as stated
2. Result was not annulled in a court of law. Courts don't have the power to do that. The only thing settled in a court of law was a libel case. Wallace's results showed the earth was not flat.
3. Lady Blount's account differs from those of others present during the experiment, the photographic evidence does not match any of the written accounts, and it is likely that Blount bribed witnesses with sexual favours. Oh, and she was a close friend of Rowbotham.
4. The experiment has been performed several times since and no other results indicating flatness have been demonstrated. Including when it was conducted by Daniel Shenton.
Founder member of the League Of Scientific Gentlemen and Mademoiselles des Connaissances.
I am pompous, self-righteous, thin skinned, and smug.

*

ausGeoff

  • 6091
  • +0/-0
Re: Wikipedia is favouring the globularist again
« Reply #7 on: February 22, 2015, 03:41:50 PM »
The rule for me is that if it says someone is a conspiracy theorist, that is the person telling the truth. The same rule applies if they try to defame him.

Well... this bizarre "rule" would certainly help explain why you believe the earth is flat.    ::)

Quote
But don't try to change it because these entries are directly under the satanic elite's control.

Interesting theory.  Are you channeling jroa by any chance?  He believes that satanists are running NASA.