Antimoon?

  • 12 Replies
  • 1651 Views
?

cartwheelnurd

  • 517
  • Iname as One
Antimoon?
« on: October 27, 2012, 09:51:17 PM »
The FAQ is very light on the subject of this. Can anybody elaborate?
Ravioli is how the universe fills a small part of itself with cheese.

*

Beorn

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6543
  • If I can't trust my eyes, what can I trust?
Re: Antimoon?
« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2012, 02:27:32 AM »
What do you want to know?
Quote
Only one thing can save our future. Give Thork a BanHammer for Th*rksakes!

Re: Antimoon?
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2012, 03:23:52 AM »
if there is evidence of an antimoon

*

Beorn

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6543
  • If I can't trust my eyes, what can I trust?
Re: Antimoon?
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2012, 03:42:03 AM »
Yes, you can see it when it moves in front of the moon.
Quote
Only one thing can save our future. Give Thork a BanHammer for Th*rksakes!

Re: Antimoon?
« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2012, 04:13:17 AM »
Yes, you can see it when it moves in front of the moon.

no we don't see it, we don't detect it

?

Thork

Re: Antimoon?
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2012, 04:17:26 AM »
The FAQ is very light on the subject of this. Can anybody elaborate?
Well if you want to get into the nitty-gritty and understand where this reference comes from, the answer is the original calculations of Dr Samuel Rowbotham. Below is the specific chapter in question.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/za29.htm

Re: Antimoon?
« Reply #6 on: October 28, 2012, 01:24:35 PM »
Anyone who is a Zetetic agrees that the Anti-moon is just a theory.
Funny how it only shows itself during the Lunar eclipse.

?

cartwheelnurd

  • 517
  • Iname as One
Re: Antimoon?
« Reply #7 on: October 28, 2012, 01:39:01 PM »
Anyone who is a Zetetic agrees that the Anti-moon is just a theory.
Funny how it only shows itself during the Lunar eclipse.

so it is just anothert hng you are divided over?
Ravioli is how the universe fills a small part of itself with cheese.

Re: Antimoon?
« Reply #8 on: October 28, 2012, 01:45:56 PM »
I would think, that because the FES is based on Zetetic Astronomy, the "Anti-Moon" was a 19th century answer to the Lunar Eclipse. Now we know the that is not true.

?

Thork

Re: Antimoon?
« Reply #9 on: October 28, 2012, 01:47:54 PM »
Anyone who is a Zetetic agrees that the Anti-moon is just a theory.
Funny how it only shows itself during the Lunar eclipse.

so it is just anothert hng you are divided over?
Most of us aren't keen on the anti-moon theory. Its part of FET, some like it, its as valid as anything else but its difficult to defend when your heart isn't in it. Instead I prefer to just point to sources and let you make up your own mind. I think eclipses are something else entirely, but that's another thread altogether.

?

cartwheelnurd

  • 517
  • Iname as One
Re: Antimoon?
« Reply #10 on: October 28, 2012, 02:20:53 PM »
If your heart isnt in the antimoon theory does that not just pun a hole right through FET? Nothing else could account for the eclipses.
Ravioli is how the universe fills a small part of itself with cheese.

?

Thork

Re: Antimoon?
« Reply #11 on: October 28, 2012, 02:30:40 PM »
Nothing else? Just as RET has several theories on the formation of the moon, we have several theories on the cause of eclipses.
 

?

cartwheelnurd

  • 517
  • Iname as One
Re: Antimoon?
« Reply #12 on: October 28, 2012, 02:32:11 PM »
give me some
Ravioli is how the universe fills a small part of itself with cheese.