If you don't want to embarrass yourself you shouldn't have posted in the first place. Aether... really?
Yeah that's where youre Wrong. I still find it really really silly. As someone who studied Einsteinian physics at a collegiate level, I can assure you that you have A gross misunderstanding of them.
I didn't say it was the same as Einsteinian aether. Just that it was a similar principle in that both are related to gravity and neither to light. As I said, please do not be ignorant.
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
Quote from: Tausami on October 23, 2012, 12:20:59 PMI didn't say it was the same as Einsteinian aether. Just that it was a similar principle in that both are related to gravity and neither to light. As I said, please do not be ignorant.I could be wrong, but from what I can gather, Einstein's proposed aether is more or less the substance of empty space.
Unlike our esteemed colleague I've never taken a class in Einsteinian physics, but from what I can tell it was just his term for the gravitational field around a body.
Quote from: Tausami on October 23, 2012, 12:43:23 PMUnlike our esteemed colleague I've never taken a class in Einsteinian physics, but from what I can tell it was just his term for the gravitational field around a body. No, Einstein described the gravitational field of a body as mass warping space-time around that body.
Einstein sometimes used the word aether for the gravitational field
Quote from: Lord Wilmore on October 18, 2012, 06:41:35 PMThe size of the Moon has not been established in my view. As for the implausibility of the kind of ecology proposed, their are many lifeforms on Earth which show a similar consistency in their behaviour, or at least they did prior to the anthropocene. Once again, Master Willmore goes against the FAQ, I am so glad this society has someone going Rogue, we love you far that!
The size of the Moon has not been established in my view. As for the implausibility of the kind of ecology proposed, their are many lifeforms on Earth which show a similar consistency in their behaviour, or at least they did prior to the anthropocene.