The gyro drop experiment was done by the team of engineers/scientists who worked with the late Dr. Bruce DePalma, PhD, researcher at MIT, (read the link to see the perfect conditions for vacuum were complied with).
It was carefully performed, as we can see from the undeniable data:
http://www.depalma.pair.com/gyrodrop.htmlA flagrant violation of the law of attractive gravity.
Torsion physics defies attractive gravity: here are experiments performed by none other than N. Kozyrev, the greatest astrophysicist of the 20th century.
A.N. KOZYREV GYROSCOPE EXPERIMENTS - inexistence of attractive gravity, UA acceleration
According to the theory developed by N.A.Kozyrev, the greatest astrophysicist of the former Soviet Union, time and rotation are closely interconnected.
In order to verify his theory, N.A.Kozyrev conducted a series of experiments with spinning gyroscopes. The goal of these experiments was to make a measurement of the forces arising while the gyroscope was spinning.
N.A.Kozyrev detected that the weight of the spinning gyroscope changes slightly depending on the angular velocity and the direction of rotation. The effect he discovered was not large, but the nature of the arising forces could not be explained by existing theories. N.A.Kozyrev explained the observed effect as being the manifestation of some "physical properties of time".
The results were published in the work The Pendulum of the Universe.
Kozyrev torsion fields:
http://www.soulsofdistortion.nl/tors1a.htmlAether, time, Kozyrev torsion fields:
http://web.archive.org/web/20081010174600/http://divinecosmos.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=334&Itemid=30]http://web.archive.org/web/20081010174600/http://divinecosmos.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=334&Itemid=30
I only use the best bibliographical and experimental data, you should understand that by now.
If you really want to know what pressure gravity is, read here:
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php/topic,30499.msg1255899.html#msg1255899Please answer the tides paradox.
If a variable pressure is pushing down on the Earth, why does water rise up and lower at various times during the day?Now you are really beginning to use your brain, finally.
Over the oceans, the gravitational pull is greater than over the continents, though according to the theory of attractive gravitation the reverse should be true; the hypothesis of isostasy also is unable to explain this phenomenon. The gravitational pull drops at the coast line of the continents. Furthermore, the distribution of gravitation in the sea often has the peculiarity of being stronger where the water is deeper. “In the whole Gulf and Caribbean region the generalization seems to hold that the deeper the water, the more strongly positive the anomalies.”
As far as observations could establish, the sea tides do not influence the plumb line,
which is contrary to what is expected. Observations on reservoirs of water, where the mass of water could be increased and decreased, gave none of the results anticipated on the basis of the theory of gravitation.
Here is Dr. T. Henry Moray explaining the influence of the telluric currents (ether) upon the sea tides:
During the Christmas Holidays of 1911, I began to fully realize that the energy I was working with was not of a static nature, but of an oscillating nature. Further I realized that the energy was not coming out of the earth, but instead was coming to the earth from some outside source. These electrical oscillations in the form of waves were not simple oscillations, but were surgings --- like the waves of the sea --- coming to the earth continually, more in the daytime than at night, but always coming in vibrations from the reservoir of colossal energy out there in space. By this time I was able to obtain enough power to light the old 16-candlepower carbon lamp for about one half capacity, and I did not seem to make any further improvement until the spring of 1925."
These peculiar waves did not arrive with "clock precision". Just like ocean waves, they arrived in schedules of their own. Dr. Moray was convinced that these were world-permeating waves. He came to believe that they represented the natural "cadence of the universe". This intriguing characteristic suggested that small amounts of pulsating electrostatic charge might be used to induce large oscillations in a large "tank" of charge. The resultant oscillating power would be applied to industrial use.
You are the one stalling the discussion.
Here is a single paragraph of the barometric pressure paradox, it shows that there is no such thing as attractive gravity:
One maximum is at 10 a.m., the other at 10 p.m.; the two minima are at 4 a.m. and 4 p.m. The heating effect of the sun can explain neither the time when the maxima appear nor the time of the minima of these semidiurnal variations. If the pressure becomes lower without the air becoming lighter through a lateral expansion due to heat, this must mean that the same mass of air gravitates with changing force at different hours.
Gases in the atmosphere, or at room temperature, COULD NOT behave the way they do, had attractive gravity been a real phenomenon.
Please read again.
Even if perfect elasticity is a quality of the molecules of all gases, the motion of the molecules, if effected by a mechanical cause,
must subside because of the gravitational attraction between the particles and also because of the gravitational pull of the earth. There should also be a loss of momentum as the result of the transformation of a part of the energy of motion into vibration of molecules hit in the collisions. But since the molecules of a gas at a constant temperature (or in a perfect insulator) do not stop moving, it is obvious that a force generated in collisions drives them. The molecules of gases try to escape one another. Repulsion between the particles of gases and vapors counteracts the attraction.
With attractive gravity, there would be NO Brownian motion, and a complete separation of the gases in the atmosphere according to their specific weights.
Until you can tell me the time it takes for a molecule of nitrogen to rise through layers of CO2 and Oxygen (or really any combination of movement) then you have nothing to add to this discussion.Had attractive gravity been a real phenomenon, I repeat, the nitrogen should stream upward, and the oxygen should drop, preceded by the argon.
Brownian motion is a defiance of attractive gravity; and so is the fact that the gases in the atmosphere do not separate and stay apart according to their specific gravities.
You seem not to understand what is going on: you are discovering for the first time, thanks to my messages, the defiance of attractive gravity by gases.