If I didn't keep nit-picking about every little thing I could, conversations could continue without getting derailed.
Fixed.
Also, markjo has been here a lot longer than you, TK. You probably post ten times more drivel than markjo. Don't try to use post counts to make yourself look like a better poster.
1. I didn't derail the thread as I was discussing something pertinent to the topic, i.e. Newton's laws, gravity, etc. But since you autohit reply to post a criticism when you see my post, without reading said post, I wouldn't expect you to have noticed.
2. The post count comment was an ironic dig at Hoppy for complaining that I post too much. If you can't understand that then perhaps you should return to the lower forums.
3. There are many people supporting the RE side here who have been here longer than I have, yet do not use the most effective arguments against FET. I haven't seen any threads proving the ISS is a satellite, crushing UA using "inexplicable" variances in
g or disproving Tom's constant babble that high altitude curvature is caused by lens distortion before I came along. Why not?