Bad science

  • 11 Replies
  • 3023 Views
?

ikvsabre

Bad science
« on: October 02, 2006, 11:22:20 PM »
from the FAQ:

"Q: "Please explain sunrises/sunsets."

A: It's a perspective effect. Really, the sun is just getting farther away; it looks like it disappears because everything gets smaller and eventually disappears as it gets farther away. "

Light does not just stop travelling. If the sun was the size specified, it would still appear as a sizeable lighted ball during the night-time.

Also, given the required trajectory of the sun's movement, the radius of the circle of the track of the sun's motion would not be that big.....not far enough to make the sun fade substantially.

?

Cupit

  • 11
  • +0/-0
Bad science
« Reply #1 on: October 03, 2006, 12:09:46 AM »
You have to take the broken science of FE into account..
quot;Who's got the last laugh now?"

?

Qu4dro

Bad science
« Reply #2 on: October 03, 2006, 01:31:35 AM »
Does FE really even qualify as science?  I mean, has anyone put these FE 'theories' to the test?  As far as I'm concerned, FE is a belief, not a theory.

?

VJ

  • 66
  • +0/-0
Bad science
« Reply #3 on: October 03, 2006, 02:31:59 AM »
Quote from: "Qu4dro"
Does FE really even qualify as science?  I mean, has anyone put these FE 'theories' to the test?  As far as I'm concerned, FE is a belief, not a theory.
Indeed, I generiously call it a hypothosis, but in reality it is not any more than an irrational belief, much like belief in god, but at least the religious admit they're believers, and don't pose their ideas as science (except for IDers, but that's a whole other thread).
- share & enjoy

?

screwyoufags

Bad science
« Reply #4 on: October 03, 2006, 04:23:52 AM »
who the fuck cares?
instead of analysing what shape the earth might be, we should be more worried about what's happening to the world because of stupid americans and their big cars.

?

Unimportant

  • 1229
  • +0/-0
Bad science
« Reply #5 on: October 03, 2006, 04:27:42 AM »
Great, another drama major.

?

mjk

  • 269
  • +0/-0
Bad science
« Reply #6 on: October 03, 2006, 05:14:13 AM »
no, YOU'RE bad at science!
quote="diegodraw"]you never mentioned anything about antagonizing naive idiots who have reason to believe they should defend what everyone already knows is logical....Not like anybody would ever have fun doing that, of course[/quote]

?

Yardstick2006

  • 280
  • +0/-0
Bad science
« Reply #7 on: October 03, 2006, 06:28:59 AM »
Quote from: "Unimportant"
Great, another drama major.


Shut up.
quote="Dogplatter"]
Penguins were actually created in the 1960's by Russian scientists who combined the DNA of otters and birds.  [/quote]


LOL

?

Unimportant

  • 1229
  • +0/-0
Bad science
« Reply #8 on: October 03, 2006, 06:38:27 AM »
Quote from: "mjk"
no, YOU'RE bad at science!

Am not!

?

Ebolorama

  • 26
  • +0/-0
Bad science
« Reply #9 on: October 04, 2006, 02:26:46 PM »
Your all idiots. (FE believers)
uh, your all idiots.

*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • +0/-0
  • Meep.
Bad science
« Reply #10 on: October 04, 2006, 04:32:57 PM »
Quote from: "Ebolorama"
Your all idiots. (FE believers)

...


I do honestly pray that you realize how incredibly ironic that sentence was...

~Diego.

?

Ashantai

  • 199
  • +0/-0
Bad science
« Reply #11 on: October 04, 2006, 05:31:25 PM »
I doubt he does, mate, I really do.