Please provide some proof or actual hard evidence of your "theory"

Then you are American. 

Please stay on topic, if you would.

Happy Forever I am still waiting for your proofs. This is open to anyone. This thread seems to be dying. This is either because no one can give me proof, or they think I will discredit it. I believe I have mentioned what I would accept. If I could see something good enough, I would even do further research into the topic.

I already did a big research showing the truth, I still working on it but really in bad need for people to participate. Would you like?

Not unless I can see something that would give me reason to research. I did the same when I found HET. I read alot of stuff, then I did some math and some further research on my own.

No at all, it is the end.

The earth is flat is a fact with no slight doubt. I ask you to be with me in this mind war.

What ever you just said, it didn't make much sense to me. You will have to conduct your research on your own (or at least without me).

Happy, you have to be someone's alt. you speak as if you have been into space and looked down upon a flat Earth. You then ask others to join your research, yet never have you given any explanation as to what your research is.

How are you experimentally confirming evidence with the same senses you told me to reject?

I never told you to reject direct sensorial evidence. I said direct sensorial evidence disproves FET. Of course, that isn't the best evidence, but that's the only evidence you'll accept.

The Earth is definitely flat. If for example you go to the cliffs of Dover you will see the Alps with a telescope. That is proof surely.

Oh? And what If I stand on top of Mt. Everest? Can I see the Rocky Mountain Range in North America from there? Or the other way around? (I'm much closer to the rocky's).

ClockTower already compiled an excellent summary of the evidence.  It's not exhaustive, but it's certainly better than the insultingly stupid response of "look out your window" that you get from FEers when asking for evidence.

 

Quote from: Cat Earth Theory on July 03, 2012, 03:46:40 AM

ClockTower already compiled an excellent summary of the evidence.  It's not exhaustive, but it's certainly better than the insultingly stupid response of "look out your window" that you get from FEers when asking for evidence.

 

Please don't make these kinds of low-content posts.  Respect the rules if you wish to post here.

 
I was just showing my appreciation; Is it word count that determines low-content? if you check my posts, you see on a regular basis that my content is high, though my word count might be low.

 
I was just showing my appreciation; Is it word count that determines low-content? if you check my posts, you see on a regular basis that my content is high, though my word count might be low.

It's not necessarily the word count that makes it low-content, it's the lack of adding anything useful to the discussion.

I will take the advice, although i think appreciation does add something to a conversation, meta communication is just as important as direct communicatioon. though I be moderated, and will make sure I add content that is purely direct next time.

Oh? And what If I stand on top of Mt. Everest? Can I see the Rocky Mountain Range in North America from there? Or the other way around? (I'm much closer to the rocky's).

That would be impossible. The weather is realy bad on top of mountains and you would not be able to see due to the clouds.

The Earth is definitely flat. If for example you go to the cliffs of Dover you will see the Alps with a telescope. That is proof surely.

Is there a picture of this or a way to verify that it is true (without trying it myself)? I couldn't find any support for it myself, but if you have some evidence I would like to see that

Quote from: ThinkingMan on July 06, 2012, 05:43:45 AM

Oh? And what If I stand on top of Mt. Everest? Can I see the Rocky Mountain Range in North America from there? Or the other way around? (I'm much closer to the rocky's).

That would be impossible. The weather is realy bad on top of mountains and you would not be able to see due to the clouds.

So in a hypothetical scenario where you could test out manwithanose's hypothesis, the only thing that stops you from seeing the other mountains is clouds and bad weather? If it was really good weather in between the two mountains, could manwithanose be proven wrong?

I agree with spaghetti. Given a scenario where the air was crystal clear (or as clear as possible) between the two points, could I see the other mentioned mountain range from each given location?

I agree with spaghetti. Given a scenario where the air was crystal clear (or as clear as possible) between the two points, could I see the other mentioned mountain range from each given location?

You wouldn't even need this, just do it with long wavelength radio waves they would be unaffected by the clouds. This is being done now look at radio astronomy, why do you think we use radio waves in the first place? All FE'ers need to do is set up a radio laser (a RASER?) and aim it at the other peak.

That is true, but the eye can not see radio waves, and most of the FEers I have had any interaction with like visuals. So I propose we build a massive HAARP station for them and use it (I'm not sure exactly how it work) to push the clouds out of the way and let them have at it with telescopes. Be sure to dress warm and bring oxygen, I hear the top of Everest is a cold place with thin air.

You wouldn't even need this, just do it with long wavelength radio waves they would be unaffected by the clouds. This is being done now look at radio astronomy, why do you think we use radio waves in the first place? All FE'ers need to do is set up a radio laser (a RASER?) and aim it at the other peak.

I completely forgot about that property of electromagnetism. It's actually quite brilliant. Would you happen to know of any such experiment?

I also suppose the RASER device could be set up to transmit the return signal into a visual image, light sonar and radar can right?

I also suppose the RASER device could be set up to transmit the return signal into a visual image, light sonar and radar can right?

The RASER would be a hoax and therefore any information would be null.  The Earth is flat because anything that proves it's round is a hoax.  When I look out my window I see a flat surface, and I don't care if your RASER bounces off the other peak or not.  All tangible evidence is a lie produced by the government to brainwash the public into believing a round Earth.  But it's all a hoax.

You have lurked well, brother Ninja.

Thanks.  I've spent my whole life trying to explain to my friends and family that the Earth was flat.  It's nice to finally speak with intelligent beings other than myself.

See, this is the problem with the world. That is NOT being open minded. That is NOT intelligent. Simply saying "it doesn't fit with my idea of reality, it's a hoax" is just plain stupid and ignorant. Would you say it was a hoax if someone offered to take you up into space? How can you say RASER is a hoax? Do you even know what it is? We were talking about it in an experiment to try to prove that the earth was flat. If it can get back a positive signal from the other mountain peak,  then congratulations, you've won. If not, then you must try another experiment if you really wish to prove your theory. Simply dismissing things you don't understand as lies and hoaxes is not a good way to go about living your life.

So say the brainwashed masses.  I have never seen any evidence of roundness to the surface I've been standing on my whole life, other than fixed tests and doctored results.  If I told you that 100% of the tests I ran prove this box is a sphere, even though you could see right in front of you that it was a cube, would you believe my "tests"?

Quote from: ThinkingMan on July 11, 2012, 12:04:16 PM

I also suppose the RASER device could be set up to transmit the return signal into a visual image, light sonar and radar can right?

The RASER would be a hoax and therefore any information would be null.  The Earth is flat because anything that proves it's round is a hoax.  When I look out my window I see a flat surface, and I don't care if your RASER bounces off the other peak or not.  All tangible evidence is a lie produced by the government to brainwash the public into believing a round Earth.  But it's all a hoax.

Awesome. This should be the FES mission statement.

So say the brainwashed masses.  I have never seen any evidence of roundness to the surface I've been standing on my whole life, other than fixed tests and doctored results.  If I told you that 100% of the tests I ran prove this box is a sphere, even though you could see right in front of you that it was a cube, would you believe my "tests"?

That is quite a ridiculous statement, and an invalid analogy. That box is not the size of the earth. You cannot possible judge the shape of something the size of the Earth by standing on it and looking around. How is doing an experiment for yourself to test the theory being "brainwashed." I'd call it skepticism. What you're doing, that's called ignorance. Perhaps you should look it up. You can find the definition in Merriam-webster's dictionary. Unless perhaps that's a hoax as well.