We have 3 accounts of the Bedford level experiment.
1) Rowbotham found the earth to be flat
2) Hampden and Wallace had inconclusive results and a legal battle which the FErs won.
3) Lady Blount found the earth to be flat.
Why do RErs insist on always going to the one that was inconclusive? there are two perfectly good other accounts. The Bedford Level experiment never ever proved the earth was round. Ever. But twice showed it to be flat. How desperate that RErs would try to pick the bones of the inconclusive result and try to sniff out some conclusive meaning and hold that up as the real result.
Twice the earth was proved flat. Once results were inconclusive.
So 2 for FE, 0 for RE. 1 result nullified. Arguing the earth is round seems an exercise in semantics when faced with information like this.
That's all you need to know about the Bedford level experiments. Let me leave you with this quote.
Rowbotham’s triumphant result stood until 1870, when naturalist, surveyor, and obvious crackpot Alfred Russel Wallace attempted to disprove the result. His endeavor ended only in a heated argument — and eventually a libel suit against the “planists.” (Round-earthers are clearly desperate men.)