I first saw this challenge put by NonStampCollector on YT, and haven't seen any good responses in the comments.
But the challenge goes as such: Provide any proof or evidence that it was your personal God that created the universe.
And the easier version: Provide any proof or evidence that only one God created the universe.
Rules:
No circular arguments
Faith is not evidence
Personal experience is not evidence
Don't try to change the subject
Thanks.
I believe in the existence of a God, but I feel I can't answer your questions because the first one is inapplicable to me and I don't see where the second one is in any way relevant to whether or not God exists. I certainly think there's reason to believe that there's only one God, I just don't see any way to prove it. At any rate, both questions are entirely irrelevant to what you recently stated as your ultimate concern:
...by making this thread I'm trying to prove the there are no good reasons to believe in a God.
Do you really feel something needs to be proved, in order for there to be good reason to believe in it? I ask this because you seem to have a fairly shaky understanding of the Big Bang:
That's proof of the Big bang. The beginning of the natural order, aka the opposite of God.
Any cosmologist worth his salt will tell you that the Big Bang has not been proven, it's simply the best explanation we have at the time. Your statement here also troubled me in this regard:
It's hard to talk about the physics that allow the big bang to happen here, because you don't believe in them.
Again, you don't seem to know what you're talking about. It's more than hard to talk about the physics that allowed the Big Bang to happen here, it's hard to talk about it anywhere, because it is still not the least bit understood. There are theories of course, but so far no one has come up with anything that's the least bit testable, and therefore provable. Honestly I can't help but feel that your little redirection by saying "it's hard to talk about the physics that allow the big bang to happen" and linking to a Youtube video suggests that you are trying to avoid the issue because you don't understand it yourself (a point that is only driven home by what little you have said about it).
So based on your premise that there's no good reason to believe in God because there's no proof of His existence, there is equally no good reason to believe in the Big Bang. Obviously I don't agree with
either opinion because I recognize that there are good reasons to believe in things that haven't been proven, but you seem to have trouble grasping that concept.
Also, I find your definition of "God" far too narrow:
A God has to be a eternal, all powerful creator, otherwise there wouldn't be a point to call him God. And in order for Him to be eternal, He would have to be immaterial, and would have to have infinite energy.
Why
must a God be eternal? Why
must He be all-powerful? I'd like to see some justification for that.