Satellite Media?

  • 122 Replies
  • 21639 Views
Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #60 on: April 04, 2012, 02:34:39 PM »
Oh, then what is transmitting these signals?  Towers going miles up?
It can be some kind of secret military tech.

Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #61 on: April 04, 2012, 02:38:58 PM »
And if there are, then where are the towers?

?

Cat Earth Theory

  • 1614
  • I practise the Zetetic Method!
Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #62 on: April 04, 2012, 02:39:58 PM »
Oh, then what is transmitting these signals?  Towers going miles up?
It can be some kind of secret military tech.

The Conspiracy grows...
If you focus on the cloud, and conceive of it just as you would a dream you are trying to interpret, with practice its meanings and memories will be revealed to you.

Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #63 on: April 04, 2012, 02:55:49 PM »
Celestial signals reaching terrestrial antennae are due to the existance of transmitters hung from of a network of high strength wires strung across the disk between the peaks of the ice-wall above the atmo-layer.

These wires are made of a high strength-to-weight ratio material I have dubbed 'Conspiracinium'.

More details will be included in my upcoming book -

Yours in Flatness.
« Last Edit: April 04, 2012, 03:01:31 PM by Kendrick »

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18025
Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #64 on: April 04, 2012, 11:42:38 PM »
Thank you, Tom, for beautifully illustrating why there's no point in engaging FEers seriously.


If we showed you guys a picture of little white dots on a black background would you RE'ers instantly accept that as evidence of stratellites?

Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #65 on: April 05, 2012, 01:35:20 AM »
Thank you, Tom, for beautifully illustrating why there's no point in engaging FEers seriously.


If we showed you guys a picture of little white dots on a black background would you RE'ers instantly accept that as evidence of stratellites?

If we showed you a picture of a round earth, would you instantly accept that as evidence of a conspiracy ?

?

Cat Earth Theory

  • 1614
  • I practise the Zetetic Method!
Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #66 on: April 05, 2012, 04:03:50 AM »
Thank you, Tom, for beautifully illustrating why there's no point in engaging FEers seriously.


If we showed you guys a picture of little white dots on a black background would you RE'ers instantly accept that as evidence of stratellites?

I provided you with information to take your own pictures and make your own observations.  That was the point of that post.  You know, the sort of thing Zetetics should go wild about.

But you are, of course, not the least bit interested in investigating anything.  Zeteticism for you is merely an excuse to ignore all contrary evidence.
If you focus on the cloud, and conceive of it just as you would a dream you are trying to interpret, with practice its meanings and memories will be revealed to you.

Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #67 on: April 05, 2012, 04:34:11 AM »
Zeteticism for you is merely an excuse to ignore all contrary evidence.
RE's finally have evidence? Where can i take a look?

Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #68 on: April 05, 2012, 04:40:41 AM »
Zeteticism for you is merely an excuse to ignore all contrary evidence.
RE's finally have evidence? Where can i take a look?

How about the link up there ? That is the evidence we are talking about.

Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #69 on: April 05, 2012, 07:17:29 AM »
Zeteticism for you is merely an excuse to ignore all contrary evidence.
RE's finally have evidence? Where can i take a look?

How about the link up there ? That is the evidence we are talking about.

U mean da link w little dots or wut?

Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #70 on: April 05, 2012, 07:44:05 AM »
Zeteticism for you is merely an excuse to ignore all contrary evidence.
RE's finally have evidence? Where can i take a look?

How about the link up there ? That is the evidence we are talking about.

U mean da link w little dots or wut?

No, not 'da link w little dots'... The fact that millions of people worldwide can enjoy satellite television with the dishes pointed into the sky where no tower could exist. There's your evidence.

It could not be a stratellite because for one, it would take too much energy to sustain altitude, and two, if it could it wouldn't be able to stay stationary well enough for a rigid satellite receiver dish to pick up its signals successfully.

?

The Knowledge

  • 2391
  • FE'ers don't do experiments. It costs too much.
Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #71 on: April 05, 2012, 11:04:54 AM »
The dishes only prove that they are pointed at something broadcasting. It tells us nothing about what the transmitter is.

They prove that they are either all receiving broadcasts from one object thousands of miles away, or they are receiving broadcasts from thousands of objects much closer. Since thousands and thousands of mystery stratellites would be noticeable, and they haven't been noticed, we can conclude that the former is much more likely.
Simple geometry is all that is needed to work this out.
Watermelon, Rhubarb Rhubarb, no one believes the Earth is Flat, Peas and Carrots,  walla.

Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #72 on: April 06, 2012, 01:15:42 AM »
Zeteticism for you is merely an excuse to ignore all contrary evidence.
RE's finally have evidence? Where can i take a look?

How about the link up there ? That is the evidence we are talking about.

U mean da link w little dots or wut?

No, not 'da link w little dots'... The fact that millions of people worldwide can enjoy satellite television with the dishes pointed into the sky where no tower could exist. There's your evidence.

It could not be a stratellite because for one, it would take too much energy to sustain altitude, and two, if it could it wouldn't be able to stay stationary well enough for a rigid satellite receiver dish to pick up its signals successfully.
Is my post about secret military tech invisible?  ???

Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #73 on: April 06, 2012, 03:40:29 AM »
Is my post about secret military tech invisible?  ???

No, it isn't invisible. I used to work in the very career field in the military that deals with putting satellites into space, and I can assure you that this 'secret tech' does not exist. Before anybody jumps my guns about the credibility of my claim, lets not forget that there is zero credibility to this 'secret tech' claim.

Regardless of conspiracy-founded allegations, any secret technology still needs to be implemented by means that are acceptable to flat-earth theory, in this case stratellites; the problems of energy and/or remaining stationary still remain.

Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #74 on: April 06, 2012, 04:32:23 AM »
Is my post about secret military tech invisible?  ???

Word of warning : Clayman claymans. He is
a) Profoundly incapable of having an interesting discussion
or
b) A pretty crappy troll

Anyways I strongly advise against listening to him. If you want to see for yourself, just look at the "Why is Earth so special" thread  ;)

(At least his grasp on grammar seems to have improved.)

Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #75 on: April 06, 2012, 04:41:05 AM »
Is my post about secret military tech invisible?  ???

Word of warning : Clayman claymans. He is
a) Profoundly incapable of having an interesting discussion
or
b) A pretty crappy troll

Anyways I strongly advise against listening to him. If you want to see for yourself, just look at the "Why is Earth so special" thread  ;)

(At least his grasp on grammar seems to have improved.)
Very thoughtful argument u have there. So whats wrong about secret military tech? I think it's possible and ur dishes prove nothing. R u able to have a discussion or will continue ur whinings about me trollin' u?  ::)

Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #76 on: April 06, 2012, 04:44:47 AM »
Very thoughtful argument u have there. So whats wrong about secret military tech? I think it's possible and ur dishes prove nothing. R u able to have a discussion or will continue ur whinings about me trollin' u?  ::)

Ouch. I take back the part about his grammar.  :-X

Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #77 on: April 06, 2012, 04:46:47 AM »
Very thoughtful argument u have there. So whats wrong about secret military tech? I think it's possible and ur dishes prove nothing. R u able to have a discussion or will continue ur whinings about me trollin' u?  ::)

Ouch. I take back the part about his grammar.  :-X
Oh, ur "grammar argument" again... Maybe u'll try to speak on topic? Or 2 hard 4 u?  ::)

Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #78 on: April 06, 2012, 05:03:28 AM »
Very thoughtful argument u have there. So whats wrong about secret military tech? I think it's possible and ur dishes prove nothing. R u able to have a discussion or will continue ur whinings about me trollin' u?  ::)

Ouch. I take back the part about his grammar.  :-X
Oh, ur "grammar argument" again... Maybe u'll try to speak on topic? Or 2 hard 4 u?  ::)

Back to topi dear troll. What makes you think there is some kind of military tech out there ? And how would it be able to emulate satellites ? Without being detected by anyone ?

?

Turbofan

  • 18
  • To fail to prepare is to prepare to fail!
Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #79 on: May 09, 2012, 06:07:41 PM »
If the earth was moving upward so fast, the stratallite would not have enough downward thrust to stay in the air.  Nor would airplanes, helicopters etc.

Everything is accelerating along with the Earth. Have you even bothered to read our FAQ?

your FAQ's are inaccurate airline pilots dont use GPS for navigation, i can update you if you want! you are welcome on one of my flights for free if you want  :D

?

Turbofan

  • 18
  • To fail to prepare is to prepare to fail!
Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #80 on: May 09, 2012, 07:33:17 PM »
Oh, then what is transmitting these signals?  Towers going miles up?
It can be some kind of secret military tech.

prove that!

*

Rushy

  • 8971
Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #81 on: May 09, 2012, 08:13:49 PM »
Ugh, one of these threads again. Stratellites, enough said.

?

Turbofan

  • 18
  • To fail to prepare is to prepare to fail!
Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #82 on: May 09, 2012, 10:00:52 PM »
Ugh, one of these threads again. Stratellites, enough said.

You just answered my question ;)

Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #83 on: May 12, 2012, 12:46:29 AM »
Satellites Do Exist.

Yet they don't rotate around the globe. They are fixed in one location. If they were not fixed.. then there would need to be 3 or 4 placed around the globe. Instead, it is in ONE FIXED AREA. It allows the TRIANGULATION of: 1. The dish on your roof 2. The cable, military HQ speaking to the Satellite. 3. The Satellite in the Sky.

TRIANGLES do not have curved sides. Only ONE Satellite is needed for the entire earth. Not one on one side and one on the other. And don't give me that bounce signals off each other arguement. That just tells me that you don't know anything about satellites.

Besides Sprint, Google and the Military.. who else has a satellite? They are rare, expensive and it takes moving mountains to get the go ahead to send one up.....

Also, it takes full disclosure that the earth is indeed flat

Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #84 on: May 12, 2012, 02:02:40 AM »
Satellites Do Exist.

Yet they don't rotate around the globe. They are fixed in one location. If they were not fixed.. then there would need to be 3 or 4 placed around the globe. Instead, it is in ONE FIXED AREA. It allows the TRIANGULATION of: 1. The dish on your roof 2. The cable, military HQ speaking to the Satellite. 3. The Satellite in the Sky.

TRIANGLES do not have curved sides. Only ONE Satellite is needed for the entire earth. Not one on one side and one on the other. And don't give me that bounce signals off each other arguement. That just tells me that you don't know anything about satellites.

Besides Sprint, Google and the Military.. who else has a satellite? They are rare, expensive and it takes moving mountains to get the go ahead to send one up.....

Also, it takes full disclosure that the earth is indeed flat

Satellites move. Do your resesearch.
“The Earth looks flat, therefore it is” FEers wisdom.

*

Conker

  • 1557
  • Official FES jerk / kneebiter
Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #85 on: May 12, 2012, 02:08:21 PM »
Satellites Do Exist.

Yet they don't rotate around the globe. They are fixed in one location. If they were not fixed.. then there would need to be 3 or 4 placed around the globe. Instead, it is in ONE FIXED AREA. It allows the TRIANGULATION of: 1. The dish on your roof 2. The cable, military HQ speaking to the Satellite. 3. The Satellite in the Sky.

TRIANGLES do not have curved sides. Only ONE Satellite is needed for the entire earth. Not one on one side and one on the other. And don't give me that bounce signals off each other arguement. That just tells me that you don't know anything about satellites.

Besides Sprint, Google and the Military.. who else has a satellite? They are rare, expensive and it takes moving mountains to get the go ahead to send one up.....

Also, it takes full disclosure that the earth is indeed flat

Satellites move. Do your resesearch.

As I know you are not going to research anything, jhonnyidontcare, here are a few examples:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_flare#Iridium_satellite_flare

http://www.amsat.org/amsat-new/satellites/status.php

http://www.n2yo.com/satellites/?c=18

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geostationary_orbit

http://maps.google.com/
This is not a joke society.
Quote from: OpenedEyes
You shouldn't be allowed to talk on a free discussion forum.

?

The Knowledge

  • 2391
  • FE'ers don't do experiments. It costs too much.
Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #86 on: May 14, 2012, 04:37:15 PM »
Ugh, one of these threads again. Stratellites, enough said.

Disproven by the post at the top of page 2. Learn to read.
Watermelon, Rhubarb Rhubarb, no one believes the Earth is Flat, Peas and Carrots,  walla.

*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #87 on: May 14, 2012, 05:38:58 PM »
Prove and disprove must mean entirely different things in your language.
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."

?

The Knowledge

  • 2391
  • FE'ers don't do experiments. It costs too much.
Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #88 on: May 14, 2012, 05:58:41 PM »
Prove and disprove must mean entirely different things in your language.

Oh really? You think having thousands and thousands of stratellites that nobody knows are there, over every country (the requirement for explaining the angle of the dishes pointing at a lower altitude object) is a viable theory?
Didn't they teach you trigonometry at school?
Or is that just a meaningless, snarky, low content post from you?
Watermelon, Rhubarb Rhubarb, no one believes the Earth is Flat, Peas and Carrots,  walla.

Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #89 on: May 14, 2012, 06:46:10 PM »
satellites can, and do exist.
to think otherwise is unbecoming of a Zetetic