Satellite Media?

  • 122 Replies
  • 22026 Views
*

Conker

  • 1557
  • +0/-0
  • Official FES jerk / kneebiter
Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #120 on: May 20, 2012, 01:51:51 PM »
The Knowdlege's post about stratellites definitelly disproves them, and post made by trig and me disproved any non aerial mean of transmission of Sat TV (Pseudolites). So RE wins
This is not a joke society.
Quote from: OpenedEyes
You shouldn't be allowed to talk on a free discussion forum.

Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #121 on: May 20, 2012, 07:24:41 PM »
The Knowdlege's post about stratellites definitelly disproves them, and post made by trig and me disproved any non aerial mean of transmission of Sat TV (Pseudolites). So RE wins

Actually, stratollites are a plausible technology. However, they're not a currently plausible replacement for satellites. They're a reasonable thing in themselves, but not a reasonable thing to claim a substitute for satellites.

*

Conker

  • 1557
  • +0/-0
  • Official FES jerk / kneebiter
Re: Satellite Media?
« Reply #122 on: May 21, 2012, 06:36:16 AM »
The Knowdlege's post about stratellites definitelly disproves them, and post made by trig and me disproved any non aerial mean of transmission of Sat TV (Pseudolites). So RE wins

Actually, stratollites are a plausible technology. However, they're not a currently plausible replacement for satellites. They're a reasonable thing in themselves, but not a reasonable thing to claim a substitute for satellites.

Sorry, I wanted to say "a current replacement for satellites".
This is not a joke society.
Quote from: OpenedEyes
You shouldn't be allowed to talk on a free discussion forum.