There is no evidence that it is a continent on the bottom of the Earth.
Apart from cartography indicating that it is. Next?
There is no evidence that the earth is a ball rather than any other shape.
Apart from eyewitness accounts from high altitude and space, and the visible shadow on the moon during an eclipse, and the predictions of gravity, you're quite right, it could well be an icosahedron. In fact, about the only shape it can't be is flat.
There is no evidence that if the earth was a sphere, antarctica is not on the top.
There is no "top" or "bottom" on the sphere of earth except by convention. And I think you'll find that it's actually never right on the bottom even then. Next?
There is no explanation from RE'res for the sun being as hot as it is.
There are theories, though we lack some data needed to test them. You carefully neglect to mention there's no explanation in FET either.
There is no evidence that anyone has ever traversed Antarctica.
Lies. Next?
There is no explanation for the Bedford Level experiment.
If you mean Rowbotham's results as opposed to everybody else's, yes there is. Poorly conducted science, or possibly a mirage effect that nobody else saw when they repeated the experiment and showed curvature.
There is no explanation form RE'ers as to why there is only one route to the south polar base.
There are plenty of
possible routes to the south polar bases, but why not take the easiest one rather than the ones that increase your chances of falling into a crevasse on the way there?
There is no explanation of why nobody has seen the curvature during flights, or if this isn't high enough, why it doesn't appear in those videos everyone links.
Lies. Even denying the existence of pictures posted in my thread debunking the wide angle lens excuse. You exhibit the signs of trolling here.
There is no explanation of why nobody can go further than 90 degrees south.
At least you're honest about that, even if all the rest is strawmen and lies.