Re-did the sun pictures. Morning, noon, and sunset. Additional observations.

  • 36 Replies
  • 14111 Views
?

EireEngineer

  • 1204
  • +0/-0
  • Woo Nemesis
As clueless as he is, SES raises an interesting point.  What is the FET explanation for sunspot activity?
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the precipitate.

*

Conker

  • 1557
  • +0/-0
  • Official FES jerk / kneebiter
I bet for dust or micro anti-Suns. Or maybe they´ll say it´s part of the elecrophotonical mechanism that keeps the sun fixed to the sky
This is not a joke society.
Quote from: OpenedEyes
You shouldn't be allowed to talk on a free discussion forum.

*

29silhouette

  • 3374
  • +0/-0
Like I said, if the earth is flat, and the sun is only 3000 miles up, the rotation of those sunspots (when present) should look different from latitudes further south.  I'm at 46*47'39 N.  If anybody far enough south wants to take some pictures to see if it changes, we shall await your results.


?

clayman

  • 75
  • +0/-0
Like I said, if the earth is flat, and the sun is only 3000 miles up, the rotation of those sunspots (when present) should look different from latitudes further south.  I'm at 46*47'39 N.  If anybody far enough south wants to take some pictures to see if it changes, we shall await your results.
u r forgetting about refraction

?

iconoclast

  • 151
  • +0/-0
Refraction says nothing about changes in the light characteristics at its source; it only explains what happens as it travels to its destination.

?

The Knowledge

  • 2391
  • +0/-0
  • FE'ers don't do experiments. It costs too much.
Like I said, if the earth is flat, and the sun is only 3000 miles up, the rotation of those sunspots (when present) should look different from latitudes further south.  I'm at 46*47'39 N.  If anybody far enough south wants to take some pictures to see if it changes, we shall await your results.

The same is true of the Moon's surface features.
Watermelon, Rhubarb Rhubarb, no one believes the Earth is Flat, Peas and Carrots,  walla.

*

29silhouette

  • 3374
  • +0/-0
Right you are.  I think I brought it up before in another thread, or not, can't remember.
Anyhow, earlier this evening at 9:16

and just a little bit ago at 12:17



*note- my camera is an hour slow.