More denial. They're not flat. When you have an explanation that accepts reality, please post it in the appropriate thread (I don't think Brother Scvs appreciates discussions of globularist propaganda in the midst of his moral protest thread).
Funny you mention your derailment discussion after you've lost the debate.
What?
Agreed. What is the world is Rushy smoking? Isn't his post itself a derailment?
Now on topic: amateur photos confirm NASA's. That lends great credibility to NASA.
Yes, don't worry Zarg, ClockTower, who loses all of his debates as well, is here to console you and give you a pat on the back. He knows how it feels and would probably advise you push onward until you reach over five thousand posts and no one takes you seriously. I'm here to advise you not to do that, admit you lost to Tom Bishop and try to get him again later. You could always continue to be in denial (you heavily accused Tom of it) and think this isn't an absolute loss.
Actually, I asked "what" because I literally didn't know what you were talking about. The only thing I can gather is that you thought I told Tom to stop the argument (because I was afraid of losing); while in reality I didn't say I wanted him to stop, I just wanted him to put his replies in the appropriate thread.
Unless of course you like this better. We can stay here too.
Either way, I'm waiting for Tom to explain the photos rather than deny that they exist. Tom knows that the curvature is visible in both night and day shots, he has posted several examples himself.
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Here's a video of the same thing. There are even more still on the Project Soar website. Tom just likes to pretend he can't see it. Maybe it's just a phase he's going through. I'll wait.