United Zetetic

I'm gathering interest on contributors (of both content and otherwise) for the new news site.  Is anyone here interested that hasn't already contacted me?

On a side note, I think I finally have the frontpage settled.  Any thoughts or tweaks anyone can think of:

The fonts will likely be substituted, they are there mainly to show the font heirarchy.  Likewise for the logo font, though I'm not sure I'm happy with the split baselines on the logo.  Also not quite sure the featured area gets enough attention with that sidebar.   

I would like to contribute articles for this venture. I have the following articles I would like to contribute:

- Modern Science is still in the Dark Ages
- Astronomers are not scientists
- The Monterey Bay Experiment
- Are Round Earthers Internet Trolls?
- The Lunar Lander is Fake: An Analysis
- Round Earth Theory cannot predict the movement of the heavens
- Zeteticism: A Primer
- NASA's Modus Operandi

Excellent.  We'll likely spread that content out over time, assuming of course its of decent quality.  Thanks Tom. 

I, too wish to contribute articles to this venture.

These will be on the following subjects:

Jurrasic Ark: Agenda for a Zetetic Palaeontology
Globularist fundamentalism and Moon Safety: a Critical Study
Stairway to Hell: The Satanic Symbols and Practices of the World's Space Agencies
Flat-ery Will Get You Nowhere: Discrimination and Spherical Chauvanism in Globularist Society

Great, I also have some others interested in helping as well.  I am concerned about Jurrasic Ark, but the rest of those seem great.  Thanks!

I'm looking at about 15-30 days for a soft launch and then a hard launch with press releases after that.  This delay is to give me some time to write up some additional code.

What a wonderful site

I think font wise you are fine. The Logo portrays quite a professional outlook.

John, I can't remember if I've asked this before or not, but in terms of articles what kind of word length are you looking for?

We'll have areas for all lengths of articles.  Blogs, Full length, and little news blurbs.  The content is more important than the length, to me.  Write what you need to.


I'm reinvisioning some of what the UZ is going to do as well as getting ready to contact Daniel concerning some mutual matters concerning it.  I'll keep folks more up to do and a progress meter should be up sometime this week with milestones.

In which format should we submit our work to you?  Would you like us to include pictures, text formatting, etc., or would you like simply the printed texts?

We'll have areas for all lengths of articles.  Blogs, Full length, and little news blurbs.  The content is more important than the length, to me.  Write what you need to.


I'm reinvisioning some of what the UZ is going to do as well as getting ready to contact Daniel concerning some mutual matters concerning it.  I'll keep folks more up to do and a progress meter should be up sometime this week with milestones.

Well, to begin with feel free to take my Discourse on the Zetetic Method and use it as you wish. It's fairly substantial in length, and is both academic and provocative enough to merit publication. I may also write some small pieces on the practice of oneiromancy, and, if I get the time, a larger piece on Zetetic Phenomenology (though I will probably not have time to begin writing that for at least a month).

A new site (United Zetetic) requires a new approach, otherwise it will be the same business as usual (in spite of the interesting articles proposed here by various members).


UA acceleration cannot be used to explain anything on a flat earth; the same goes for the infinite earth hypothesis.

The sun does rise and set, and satellites do exist.


Gravity (both terrestrial and planetary) on a flat earth cannot be explained outside of or without the ether/aether theories:

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1255899#msg1255899

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=53879.msg1325247#msg1325247

As an example of this new approach, the photoelectric suspension "theory" should be replaced immediately by the Biefeld-Brown effect (the correct physical description on how the planets/stars orbit above the flat Earth):

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1326654#msg1326654

The main concern of the news source will be zeteticism rather than flat earth theory.  There will be a specific and prominent section for articles  (and another section for academic papers) on flat earth theory.

What is the status on this?

What is the status on this?

End of year for soft launch, its looking like.

I would like to contribute with writings on the relationship between Zeteticism and the Tao. 

Once Daniel responds back to you on this, it will be interesting to hear how and where it will fit into TFES.