Quote from: Vatos_Locos_Forever on December 29, 2011, 08:55:17 PM
There is no need to prove anything. It's been settled. For centuries.
Why are you here, then? What is it you're trying to prove.
That you don't have to prove something, since it has already "been proven"? By the people who proved it are dead, now. Their words mean less than dung.
If you are comfortable with devouring the dung of the deceased, who "may or may not" have proven something, you're in the wrong place.
This isn't "Geography Enthusiast Channel". Here we believe what we love to. And prove it ourselves. What the dead may or may not have done, is of little to absolutely no relevance here.
Again, if what you said were true, you wouldn't need to be here trying to reaffirm it's so called principles. Which were never proven in the first place. Which is why you're here, failing at supporting them.
Lol. RET doesn't need a god to keep things running. Conservation of energy and momentum are sufficient to keep stuff orbiting the sun.
Besides, doesn't FET also require celestial bodies to orbit as well?
That only works in a void, which you have failed to prove. In FET, air is in the upper layers of air. With resistance, and so forth. Why do you think rockets or satellites need a boost to give them momentum?
The flying satellites above the Flat Earth, prove RET impossible. Because even they require that boost from time to time, to counter the friction of the air there.
Just because I wear a mask, doesn't make the void around it. A mask doesn't make void around it. You can go in any place with breathable air, and put a mask on. But this doesn't prove there isn't breathable air outside that mask.
I believe there are giant mirrors, or clouds with liniar reflective properties in the sky, that simply reflect the imoble mass of stagnant stars.
When that reflective mass of mist or clouds moves in a constant way, it creates a constant moving illusion by projecting the very unmoving stars on the other side of that projection.
I asked this question in Yahoo Answers, awhile back. If there was a large mirror on the sky, reflecting everything there to the Earth, how could you know which is the real sky, and which one is just it's reflection?
No one had the reasonable answer. They couldn't prove that was "the real sky", and not just a mobile mirror reflecting it.
For all we know all stars could have been imobile above the Flat Earth. Only enough digital technology or mirroring properties, found a way to reflect it circularly, at a steady rythm, that gives the illusion of their moving about.
A comet or falling meteorite could prove what you see up is truly the "real sky", but most of those never fall down to the earth. They burn out in the sky above. Very few of those actually hit the earth. And when they do, it's rarely proven they landed exactly where they were seen falling towards.
That alone proves the sky itself could be a moving reflection of the true sky, which doesn't move.
I thank you.
Quote from: ClockTower on Today at 12:20:54 AM
3) I asked you to explain the motion of the stars in sky given your unsubstantiated claim above. I was quite clear that I was concerned with the problem "in FET". You deflect with a off-topic comment about RET. Regarding what this has to do with our "conversation line", I'd answer that I'm only pointing out how silly your claim was.
Mobile mirrors, again. Mobile mirrors.
Again. Mobile mirrors. Again.
Mobile mirrors can create the illusion of motion. If someone moves a door, with a mirror on the outside of itself, you see your reflection moving away from itself, in front of you.
Again, a reflection moves along with the mirror projecting it.
Again, reflections can move. Even when their source of light does not.
Common sense proves that. And reflective properties have been discovered and used in many forms for longer than history cares to admit.
It could even be a hologram, projected on the sky. Maybe all the volcanoes on the earth, are being reflected by secret mirrors, in the direction of the sky, where a mobile mirror reflects them back to earth.
This is why the "sun" resembles burning volcanoes, because it's actually their live projection, back from the earth.
After all, radio waves are projected and reflected many times in the air, are they not? That's how they travel so far, they reflect off the air layers, and the ground itself.
Just because you're a lazy thinker, doesn't make the Flat Earth as lazy as you are. Whoever created the illusion of a moving sky, using mirrors above the Flat Earth, could have very well died for who knows how long.
But the illusion remains.
Only it broke over Norway, or Sweden ... I don't know where, a couple of years ago. I saw it on the news, and then even watched the videos of it online, on youtube.
A "galaxy" spinning then losing light gradually, then collapsing into darkness. It's illusion broke. Or the light source creating it's illusion, dissappeared.
Wether it was radioactive light or metals, that run out after a long time, who knows ? It extinguished itself on the sky, above Europe, somewhere in Scandinavia.
For all within visual range to see it on the night sky. A whole galaxy fading away, just like you turn off a light switch.
That is irrefutable evidence, even for you pathetic losers. Or wait ... did your RET worshiping media even let that go on the news, in your region of the Flat Earth?