How does Thork explain eclipses without the Antimoon?

  • 8 Replies
  • 2086 Views
?

The Knowledge

  • 2391
  • FE'ers don't do experiments. It costs too much.
How does Thork explain eclipses without the Antimoon?
« on: February 14, 2012, 04:00:32 AM »
Oh, the anti-moon. I never go in for that anyway. Its a bloody mess of a theory.


Watermelon, Rhubarb Rhubarb, no one believes the Earth is Flat, Peas and Carrots,  walla.


?

The Knowledge

  • 2391
  • FE'ers don't do experiments. It costs too much.
Re: How does Thork explain eclipses without the Antimoon?
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2012, 10:03:29 AM »
http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/za29.htm

Er... that explanation uses the antimoon. Here's the quotes:
We have seen that, during a lunar eclipse, the moon's self-luminous surface is covered by a semi-transparent something; that this "something" is a definite mass, because it has a distinct and circular outline.
It is this dark or "non-luminous satellite," which when in conjunction or in a line with the moon and an observer on earth, IS THE IMMEDIATE CAUSE OF A LUNAR ECLIPSE
[Rowbotham's shouty caps, not mine].

Sounds like the antimoon to me.
Watermelon, Rhubarb Rhubarb, no one believes the Earth is Flat, Peas and Carrots,  walla.

*

Pongo

  • Planar Moderator
  • 6753
Re: How does Thork explain eclipses without the Antimoon?
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2012, 10:49:18 PM »
I don't like the anti-moon theory either.  I think moon phases are much better explained by the bioluminescent -- or possibly electroluminescent -- moon fungus migrating across the surface.

?

The Knowledge

  • 2391
  • FE'ers don't do experiments. It costs too much.
Re: How does Thork explain eclipses without the Antimoon?
« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2012, 01:13:11 PM »
Thork has not explained what his alternative to the Antimoon is. I await his answer. Surely he has some mighty sound science to back him up.
Watermelon, Rhubarb Rhubarb, no one believes the Earth is Flat, Peas and Carrots,  walla.

?

Thork

Re: How does Thork explain eclipses without the Antimoon?
« Reply #5 on: February 15, 2012, 01:23:51 PM »
Thork has not explained what his alternative to the Antimoon is. I await his answer. Surely he has some mighty sound science to back him up.
I'm having a little holiday from the upper fora. You can pester someone else for a bit.

?

The Knowledge

  • 2391
  • FE'ers don't do experiments. It costs too much.
Re: How does Thork explain eclipses without the Antimoon?
« Reply #6 on: February 15, 2012, 01:25:57 PM »
Thork has not explained what his alternative to the Antimoon is. I await his answer. Surely he has some mighty sound science to back him up.
I'm having a little holiday from the upper fora. You can pester someone else for a bit.

I shall make the assumption that you favour the standard earth-sun-moon RET model until such time as I stand corrected by your posting of an alternative system, then. Good day.
Watermelon, Rhubarb Rhubarb, no one believes the Earth is Flat, Peas and Carrots,  walla.

?

Thork

Re: How does Thork explain eclipses without the Antimoon?
« Reply #7 on: February 15, 2012, 01:26:37 PM »
You do whatever makes you happy. ::)

?

The Knowledge

  • 2391
  • FE'ers don't do experiments. It costs too much.
Re: How does Thork explain eclipses without the Antimoon?
« Reply #8 on: February 15, 2012, 01:27:47 PM »
You do whatever makes you happy. ::)

I can't, Master Lord Willmire ordered me to stop.  :(
Watermelon, Rhubarb Rhubarb, no one believes the Earth is Flat, Peas and Carrots,  walla.